pillarpod

a custom cam is the way

fuzzyjk

iTrader: (4)

I would be happy with anything better that a 12.2.

The reason I went with the 227 was for the stealth effect not for all out power.

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Like I said, the 227 is a torque cam, the goobers comparing it to the HOT cam are forgetting the HOT is a HP cam.
I am not saying the 227 is a bad choice, it is mild and proven will run well a LONG time before wearing out a spring like the 918.

People are also inflating your numbers because they put undo faith in Lloyd's magic.

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

Duane you are misguided. You do realize a set of LE1s has been over 400rwhp right?

I BUILT a car with cam similar to the 227 with more lift. 411 rwhp all day long.

dlozSS

I have a very similar set up that im working on my 97ss, LE1 heads n 3600 stall as well...should be getting a dynotune in about 2 weeks when I put the block back in n ill post my numbers

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

The good(not Lloyd's) ported LT1 stock castings have been over 500rwhp on multiple cars even through automatic transmissions and 9". That does not mean every instance of their use is 450+rwhp.

But hell you are so stupid you can't spell something written right in front of you so I guess I am stupid for even trying to reason with you.

Here is a post about actual results with LE2s and the similar Lingenfelter 211/219 cam, the Lingenfelter actually has a bit more lift. http://camaroz28.com/forums/showpost...29&postcount=1

Show me an example to suggest I am wrong.

WS Sick

B&M = Break and Mangle.

The cheap converters create ALOT more heat and over time will eat a tranny as everyone knows heat is a trannies poison.

I would not use that cam if I was wanting 375 RWhp.

fuzzyjk

iTrader: (4)

Looking for 375 crank HP.

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

all hail ai!!!!!

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

Do wayne

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

How about that example I asked for?

gregrob

iTrader: (8)

Just wait til he dynos it

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

I had AI in consideration BIG time until an email I relieved from them you can't argue there results. But after what was said........I'll like spending my money else where.

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Again back on target, I sited a comparable example that fell short of even my prediction and you guys are blasting my prediction as too low. Show me what you are basing your guess on.

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-m...o-results.html

Something like that?

RamAir95TA

iTrader: (2)

Funny when LE guys cry when AI tells it like it is, especially when they know nothing about either one.

I could care less about the cushy feeling Lloyd gives you guys on the phone or through email. I'm after REAL results, and that's all there is to it. It's a shame that 400whp is so commonplace for LT1s nowadays. So common it just isn't impressive anymore.

Once again Lawhead, you're quick to side with LE and bash AI when you have no real-world experience.

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Are you actually so retarded you are sighting a Comp 306 example when the OP is asking about a Crane 227? You sighted a cam with 20 degrees more duration, I sighted one within 1 degree on the intake.

Just to be clear I am not saying the 227 is bad, it is mild and that is what the OP wants, that is fine so long as expectations are realistic which I think his NA expectations are but I don't think he will hit his goal on boost.

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

I have not once bashed AI until they said what they said to me

Every time someone comes on here asking I mention both companies and even after what they said to me I said they perform theres no doubt about that

and have you ran the LE's??

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Also the example you sighted was an M6.

fuzzyjk

iTrader: (4)

Will 20 degrees work out to a 83 whp difference? I don't know **** so I am looking for education not trying to bash. I know the M6 must be 20 or so HP right?

What will I need to do to I see a 12.2?