LT1's are better than LS1's
#401
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do any of the other LS1 drivers think that you're a ******* idiot? Just wondering.
#404
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
...My stock shortblock build would have waxed his **** soooo hard and it only put down 350rwhp looool.
#406
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the + means it made so much power the dyno couldn't read it, so the software just guessed. I would say he must be at least 500rwhp by now with that plastic intake and injectors.
...My stock shortblock build would have waxed his **** soooo hard and it only put down 350rwhp looool.
...My stock shortblock build would have waxed his **** soooo hard and it only put down 350rwhp looool.
![GTFO](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/gtfoslap.gif)
#407
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#410
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's really hard to have an argument or discussion with someone who can barely organize their thoughts into coherent sentences.
I guess my work here tonight is done, and on that note I think I'm gonna take a **** and go to bed. Can't wait to check this thread out tomorrow.
#412
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Whats your mighty 430+ LS1 run? I mean like actually run, at a track, with a timeslip. Not on a dyno.
Seriously, of all people to defend the LS1 i would expect an actual built one to do it. A nasty 408 stroker with a single plane and solid roller or something. Your **** is slow and is right on par with what a well built stock shortblock LT1 will put down. LS1s are great foundations to build on, but just like LT1s they are old news. Plus it looks really bad when its the slow people who brag and boast about them and make the rest of the owners look bad. Not to mention dyno numbers don't mean dick(especially when they start with "~" or end with "+"), and the ET/trap speed at the track will really show how strong the motor is.
Seriously, of all people to defend the LS1 i would expect an actual built one to do it. A nasty 408 stroker with a single plane and solid roller or something. Your **** is slow and is right on par with what a well built stock shortblock LT1 will put down. LS1s are great foundations to build on, but just like LT1s they are old news. Plus it looks really bad when its the slow people who brag and boast about them and make the rest of the owners look bad. Not to mention dyno numbers don't mean dick(especially when they start with "~" or end with "+"), and the ET/trap speed at the track will really show how strong the motor is.
#416
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well that almost made sense.
It's really hard to have an argument or discussion with someone who can barely organize their thoughts into coherent sentences.
I guess my work here tonight is done, and on that note I think I'm gonna take a **** and go to bed. Can't wait to check this thread out tomorrow.
It's really hard to have an argument or discussion with someone who can barely organize their thoughts into coherent sentences.
I guess my work here tonight is done, and on that note I think I'm gonna take a **** and go to bed. Can't wait to check this thread out tomorrow.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Sleepy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_zzz.gif)