LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Piston?

Old 03-04-2011, 07:00 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Piston?

I ordered a set of these pistons for my 355 lt1 build http://www.summitracing.com/parts/TRW-8KL2256F30/, but the guy that is balancing my motor says they are too darn heavy so I am going to exchange them and pay a little extra for these http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SLP-L2490F30/; they are supposedly lighter than the stock pistons. I am wondering if they are higher compression or lower than the pistons I originally ordered.
Old 03-04-2011, 07:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
jester1614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: west phx
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

those second pistons will be higher compression than the first ones, cause they have a 3.4 cc dish as opposed to a 6.1 cc dish
Old 03-04-2011, 07:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

O.K that's good I want to keep the compression high. Could someone help me estimate what the compression would be with lt1 le1 heads, stock rods, stock crank and a .026" thick head gasket.
Old 03-04-2011, 07:47 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
stryker1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Muncie Dragway....Indiana
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is a link to a compression calculator on the same page of the pistons that you referred to....
Old 03-04-2011, 07:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, don't know how I missed that one.
Old 03-04-2011, 08:00 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is coming out to 11.84:1; I think I will be fine on 91 octane, what is the highest compression I could run on 91 octane and drive it daily?
Old 03-04-2011, 08:24 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by henry172
It is coming out to 11.84:1; I think I will be fine on 91 octane, what is the highest compression I could run on 91 octane and drive it daily?
SCR isn't what determines octane limits, what ate your cam specs, DCR, cranking compression?
Old 03-05-2011, 09:56 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
gjohnsonws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Litchfield Park AZ
Posts: 971
Received 106 Likes on 82 Posts

Default

the 2256 will work if you want to save yourself a few bucks.Of course it will need to be re balanced,no mallory metal is needed.only welding up some of the holes on the throws is all it takes.Someone is just being hard headed with you...
Old 03-05-2011, 10:02 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
speedracer2536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im curious as to why your engine builder told you they were too heavy.. Im running the speed pro forged 4.030 pistons and they balanced out just fine..
Old 03-05-2011, 10:18 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
gjohnsonws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Litchfield Park AZ
Posts: 971
Received 106 Likes on 82 Posts

Default

Someone is being lazy and hard headed
Old 03-05-2011, 10:39 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

They are heavy...
Old 03-05-2011, 11:09 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
speedracer2536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well ya they are heavy but idk y they wouldnt balance
Old 03-05-2011, 11:38 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
ThreeHonks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: DetroitRacing.com
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

take your stuff to a different machine shop. If he really cant balance a rotating assembly, then you need to go somewhere else
Old 03-05-2011, 12:02 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Ya "wont balance " is bs. I would choose a different piston though. LT people must think it's a sin to use anything besides SRP or Speed Pro. There's a reason its the cheapest forged stuff you can find.
Old 03-05-2011, 02:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes he said he could balance it, but it will cost me more to balance and would not run as wall as the others he recommended. He also commented on the friction the first pistons will put on the cylinder.
Old 03-05-2011, 02:36 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

They are a reliable budget piston and 99% of the people on this forum don't need a super lightweight piston, nor would they be even able to tell the difference. Tons of guys are going fast with them, including myself. It's not a sin to use what's less expensive and equally as dependable as pistons twice their cost.

I suppose it's more personal preference, but I chose them in my build for their reliable track record and see great results.
Old 03-05-2011, 02:41 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
They are a reliable budget piston and 99% of the people on this forum don't need a super lightweight piston, nor would they be even able to tell the difference. Tons of guys are going fast with them, including myself. It's not a sin to use what's less expensive and equally as dependable as pistons twice their cost.

I suppose it's more personal preference, but I chose them in my build for their reliable track record and see great results.
What speed pro pistons did you use the 2256?
Old 03-05-2011, 02:47 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I was specifically talking about SRP pistons, not Speed Pros (per gregrob's post).
Old 03-05-2011, 02:51 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
henry172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SRP'S are just fine; is anyone running the SLP-L2490F30 pistons?
Old 03-05-2011, 03:23 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
speedracer2536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont see anything wrong with the speed pro's either.. I have run them in several other motors and they have never failed.. I plan on hitting my motor now with a 200 shot with the speed pro's

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Piston?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.