LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Dyno pulls with Comp 502

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2012, 07:57 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno pulls with Comp 502

My winter project went to the dyno today for a little tune and make some pulls just to see what it would make. Well it was a little better than I thought it would be. Max on a Dynojet dyno was 348 hp and 368 lb feet of torque at 5800 rpm. I am very happy with this. I originally did a PCMforless tune, and it was just not where I thought the car should be. Just thought I would share it with you guys. There's not a lot of information available about the Comp 502, but for a stock headed car I am very impressed.

Mod List 97 Camaro Z28 M6
Comp 502, Scorpion 1.6 ratio self aligning roller rockers, Alex Parts drop in LT1spring kit with new seals, Alex Parts hardened push rods.
Bosch Gen 3 30lb injectors
Pacesetter long tube headers and y pipe
Lingenfelter cold air with air foil and relocated IAT sensor to air filter housing
Delphi Opti
OVC Wires
Old 03-09-2012, 08:03 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,652
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Are these SAE numbers? Your graph does not say. Torque seems high compared to the power considering your specs.
Old 03-09-2012, 08:14 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You know I don't know I'll have to call them and ask. I just looked at my print out and it doesn't say. I am going to have my wife scan it that way I can post the whole thing. They said the same thing, like it's running out of air, I plan on a tb upgrade, but that's down the road I've spent enough money on it for this year.
Old 03-09-2012, 08:18 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've still got a flowmaster cat back that's probably not helping me out either, they mentioned that is costing me some power. And it could be the heads just won't flow and it's running out of air there too.
Old 03-09-2012, 09:35 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Not bad at all for stock heads and a mild cam like that! ...even if it is STD correction.
Tq seems right to me; it should be higher than hp for a relatively low rpm cam.
Old 03-10-2012, 08:21 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you bowtienut, I really like the cam/car combo it is so much fun. I have so much torque in the mid range from a 20 punch in first the car pulls very hard. I figured a 330 number would be tops for this cam combo. I don't know a few things though, like how much of a difference the injectors made. My stock Multitec's were real loud and had low resistance on 5 of them. Yesterday was when I put the Bosch Gen 3's in and had it re flashed and put on the dyno. The car is much smoother all around at a idle and all over. I think my Multitec's were heading down hill fast.
Old 03-17-2012, 06:33 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went by today and checked and yes, these are SAE numbers. Here's a copy of the whole sheet.


Old 03-17-2012, 08:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Rod., the dyno sheet says STD correction
Still...good numbers
Old 03-17-2012, 08:53 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you mean STD? That's pretty strong regardless... 325 ft lbs at 5700!
Old 03-18-2012, 08:09 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,652
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I figured they might be STD and depending on hum/temp, the numbers can vary a little or a lot compared to SAE. Just Call the shop and have them email you the dyno run file then you can download a free file viewer from dynojet and you will have access to all of the data. I am curious to see the SAE graph.
Old 03-18-2012, 03:06 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see that now, I thought that had something to do with the smoothing. What exactly does it mean??? SAE or STD? So I can take a flash drive over and download the file and mess around with it on the Dynojet page?
Old 03-18-2012, 08:21 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,652
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rodinator1234
I see that now, I thought that had something to do with the smoothing. What exactly does it mean??? SAE or STD? So I can take a flash drive over and download the file and mess around with it on the Dynojet page?
Correction (SAE or STD or even STP) takes into account humidity, BAR and temps and provides a "corrected" number. This number allows someone who dynos under crappy conditions to have a useful number to compare to someone who dynos under better conditions. If you dyno under the most ideal conditions, usually SAE correction will bring the number down which is fine. If you dyno under the most crappy conditions, it may actually bring it up. Think of it as leveling the playing field for dyno runs.

STD is a non industry standard and tends to provide higher numbers which is typical of the ricers trying to impress folks with their four banger crap. SAE is the industry standard and what should ideally be posted and commented to. Most people post SAE here on the boards and we simply consider it the standard. Posting STD or even worse, uncorrected usually means someones just interested in posting high numbers. The SAE correction will likely bring your numbers down some but dont fret it.

Yes take a flashdrive over and load the file on it. They might even be able to email you the file. Download the viewer from Dynojet and create the SAE graph and post it.
Old 03-19-2012, 06:15 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you wrd1972, I'll get it and see how it changes.
Old 04-05-2012, 08:39 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Bersaglieri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wild West
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Update?
Old 04-05-2012, 09:17 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a dead beat I've been working 6 12s for the last 3 weeks and then destroyed my clutch which I put a new ram powergrip on Sunday and so no I haven't had a chance to contact the tuner to get the info. I will though what I read though is there is a 2.7% difference between Standard and sae so that number should be something like 338 sae. But I intend to get it and see.
Old 04-05-2012, 12:24 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wel if Missouri has been anything like Oklahoma this past week or two then it's been a hot (high 80s) and humid sucker outside.
Old 04-05-2012, 12:39 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Rodinator1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes hot miserable for this time of year.



Quick Reply: Dyno pulls with Comp 502



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.