LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

dissapointing dyno results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2012 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
Quazz's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
Default dissapointing dyno results...

Car was just dyno tuned. Its a fully forged 383 ,home ported heads/intake, gm847 cam, 1.6rr with upgraded comp springs and trick flow 1 piece pushrods, lpe cai , built 4l60e and a pic 3600 stall. Stock auto gears in a stock 9104 bolt.

Last year before the rebuild, the car put down 380 hp..... it now puts down 320 peak. The only thing besides the motor refresh that was changed was 17" wheels from the 18's I had, and going from a stock converter to the ptc. Does a converter have that much effect on dyno hp????
Old 10-19-2012 | 01:23 PM
  #2  
pillarpod's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: South Dakota
Default

were the heads home ported the first time you got it dyno?
Old 10-19-2012 | 03:20 PM
  #3  
1QWKT/A's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default

IDK How much of an effect, but a converter does have a significant effect on dyno numbers. I'm sure someone will chime in with more knowledge.
Old 10-19-2012 | 03:55 PM
  #4  
SAPPER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 263
From: Halfway back on the Highway to Hell...again!
Default

1st, it's a dyno! Don't get too upset. A dyno is nothing more than a tuning tool. They are all different. Even the same ones may vary after a year if the owner doesn't keep up on calibrations. And that can be expensive.

2nd. A stall can be very detrimental to #'s based on lock, STR etc.

3rd. It could also be in the tune to engine and trans after the upgrades. The only truth to mods is in track times.

Ask yourself, Does it feel more powerful?" If it does, then it does.
Old 10-19-2012 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,023
Likes: 6
From: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Default

Originally Posted by SAPPER
1st, it's a dyno! Don't get too upset. A dyno is nothing more than a tuning tool. They are all different. Even the same ones may vary after a year if the owner doesn't keep up on calibrations. And that can be expensive.

2nd. A stall can be very detrimental to #'s based on lock, STR etc.

3rd. It could also be in the tune to engine and trans after the upgrades. The only truth to mods is in track times.

Ask yourself, Does it feel more powerful?" If it does, then it does.
X2!

Wifes car only lays down 365 at the tire....but runns 11s
Old 10-19-2012 | 07:46 PM
  #6  
Mystery Bird's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

I'd rather be a track king than a dyno queen. Move on and see what it does at the track.
Old 10-19-2012 | 08:34 PM
  #7  
BigD383lt1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Dunedin, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Mystery Bird
I'd rather be a track king than a dyno queen. Move on and see what it does at the track.
Nice...
Old 10-19-2012 | 08:57 PM
  #8  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Dyno's can be very deceiving, I've seen one that would consistantly dyno stockish LS1s around 360-370rwhp. Not to mention stalled auto's are whole nother can of worms.
Old 10-20-2012 | 02:20 AM
  #9  
97Z28SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 3
Default

You didn't mention whether or not you had your tune changed in the pcm after the new setup. If you didn't retune, maybe that's the problem also what headers and exhaust are you running?
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:53 AM
  #10  
Paul Bell's Avatar
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,589
Likes: 50
From: NYC
Default

Was the second dyno the same as the first time?

If yes, then yes, you've lost power.
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:00 PM
  #11  
wrd1972's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 4
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Come on guys a 383 with a 847 making 320 peak flat out indicates issues and the usual dynos a tool aint gonna fly here. Op has an issue, I would look for misfires, port quality or the tune itself.
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:12 PM
  #12  
BTC's Avatar
BTC
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 17
From: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Default

When was the home porting done? Maybe the heads are fubar.
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:38 PM
  #13  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 4
From: Bright, IN
Default

Originally Posted by BTC
When was the home porting done? Maybe the heads are fubar.
That's twice that question has been asked....
.... so.... OP ??
Old 10-20-2012 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
93Euphoria's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by Quazz
Car was just dyno tuned. Its a fully forged 383 ,home ported heads/intake, gm847 cam, 1.6rr with upgraded comp springs and trick flow 1 piece pushrods, lpe cai , built 4l60e and a pic 3600 stall. Stock auto gears in a stock 9104 bolt.

Last year before the rebuild, the car put down 380 hp..... it now puts down 320 peak. The only thing besides the motor refresh that was changed was 17" wheels from the 18's I had, and going from a stock converter to the ptc. Does a converter have that much effect on dyno hp????
your answer is your "Home Ported Heads" Thats why you have a weak number. I bet if AI did the heads youd have around 440hp.
Old 10-20-2012 | 09:13 PM
  #15  
Quazz's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
Default

Ok. It was 334 hp and 344tq . Car has a 3600 stall. The dyno was different. I have it back... and the butt dyno says it's much faster.

I know it would benefit from better heads.

We'll see what times it runs.
Old 10-20-2012 | 09:16 PM
  #16  
Quazz's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
Default

Oh, and th home porting was done way before the rebuild. No flow numbers. I have pacesetter longtubes, a ORY and a cheap *** catback. It also has a cutout. 3".
Old 10-20-2012 | 10:41 PM
  #17  
Paul Bell's Avatar
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,589
Likes: 50
From: NYC
Default

If you have the means, I would suggest you go to the first dyno again for a few pulls.
Old 10-20-2012 | 11:40 PM
  #18  
draggin97s10's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Default

i would suggest going to the track soon
Old 10-21-2012 | 06:48 AM
  #19  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 4
From: Bright, IN
Default

Originally Posted by draggin97s10
i would suggest going to the track soon
^THIS^
Since you've now said it was a differennt dyno, no need to be concerned at all. @ssed-up dyno results are not uncommon. Some of the operators don't have enough understanding to even follow the operating manual
Calculating hp from your trap speed and race weight will be far more accurate than any dyno.
Old 10-22-2012 | 08:04 PM
  #20  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Originally Posted by wrd1972
Come on guys a 383 with a 847 making 320 peak flat out indicates issues and the usual dynos a tool aint gonna fly here. Op has an issue, I would look for misfires, port quality or the tune itself.
Obviously you've seen a dyno operator blow up a motor because they didn't know how to set the load, what gear to do the pull in, etc.


Quick Reply: dissapointing dyno results...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.