LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Maximum bore LT1.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2004, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Elysian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Maximum bore LT1.

What is the maximum safe bore on an LT1 block? I've seen 4.030, 4.060 . . . how big can I safely go?
Old 05-03-2004, 07:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
dhdenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monticello, Kentucky
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To my knowledge it's only .060" over.
Old 05-04-2004, 01:19 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

yep .060 is supose to be the max, .030 works fine to build a 396 or 383.
Old 05-04-2004, 04:18 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
-PEPE-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bizzzatch350
yep .060 is supose to be the max, .030 works fine to build a 396 or 383.
I'm curious now, if .030 includes 383-396 what does .060 consist of cubic inch wise? Didn't think you could go bigger than a 410ci or so on an LT1 due to thinning the cyl walls.
Old 05-04-2004, 04:31 PM
  #5  
Nap
Teching In
 
Nap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East Central Indiana
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excuse my ignorance but how are they putting out the 427 super cars, is that a different block?
Old 05-04-2004, 07:22 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jacksonville,FL
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nap
Excuse my ignorance but how are they putting out the 427 super cars, is that a different block?

Usually they use the C5r block which has more"meat" to bore with and to stroke.
Old 05-04-2004, 11:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
Usually they use the C5r block which has more"meat" to bore with and to stroke.
Or they use cylinder sleeves.

Keep in mind the 427s are LS1-styled motors, not LT1.
Old 05-05-2004, 12:04 AM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BRETTINATOR
I'm curious now, if .030 includes 383-396 what does .060 consist of cubic inch wise? Didn't think you could go bigger than a 410ci or so on an LT1 due to thinning the cyl walls.

Just depends on what size stroke crank you use, that and bore make the cid. Mark Montalvo has built some big inch LT1s but there is a ton of work that goes in to the block and rotating asembly, he built an LT1 in the 42x range using a 4.00 crank. You cant go to big on bore with an LT1 block with out turning it in toa door stop. Big cubes are all good and well but for a street/strip car your getting the most for your money out a 383 or 396. Going that big costs money. Joe Overton who is the fastes NA LT1 is at 388cid, his work is in the head and cam. Cubes are great but you have to have a head to match and take advantage of it. Your car is going to run man once you put some heads and a 12 bolt in it.

The Formula for CID is

Bore X Bore X Stroke X # Cylinders X .7854 = CID
Old 05-05-2004, 11:28 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
-PEPE-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bizzzatch350
Your car is going to run man once you put some heads and a 12 bolt in it.

The Formula for CID is

Bore X Bore X Stroke X # Cylinders X .7854 = CID
hey thanks for the forumula and replies, learned something new today.

* 12-Bolt update: Bought my friends 12 bolt out of his 96Z28 3 weeks ago but been rained out last two weekends now. But!!! since I've had time to stare at the SOB I decided to tear it down and give it a once-thru (was bored). Well already the front seal was leaking so I knew I'd be resetting my gear lash and had to pop the cover, well in doing so found a bad carrier bearing & race and that was all I need for an excuse to replace the current 3:73s with 4:10s like my current 10 bolt has. But I also learned my axle has 33 spline Moser shafts, I knew he'd replaced the Eaton with an Auburn 700hp posi but was excited to see a 3-Series carrier (thicker gear set by roughly .230 thousandths) and Ford 9" style bearing hub assemblies (no C-clips), so when I install the 4:10 gears today I'm going to go ahead and put in extended studs for NHRA rules or whatever for slicks. Oh and it has ABS setup...not bad for 500 bucks and being 2 yrs old

now I'll need some 15x10 Prostars and 27" ET streets
Old 05-05-2004, 12:29 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
hot_red_z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bizzzatch350
The Formula for CID is

Bore X Bore X Stroke X # Cylinders X .7854 = CID
For anyone who is confused about where his value of .7854 comes from like I was, the actual formula extended out is:

(Bore/2)^2 X PI (~3.1415926) X Stroke X # of Cylinders = CID

which equals:

(Bore X Bore)/4 X PI X Stroke X # of Cylinders = CID

which can be regrouped as:

(Bore X Bore) X (1/4) X PI X Stroke X # of Cylinders = CID

or:

(Bore X Bore) X (PI / 4) X Stroke X # of Cylinders = CID

The value of PI/4 is approximately .78539... and is simply shifted to the far right of the equation...
Old 05-05-2004, 04:36 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
dhdenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monticello, Kentucky
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I feel like I have to say something too. There's a cost benefit tradeoff to the bigger cube motors. They might make some more power but how much do you wanna pay? Like Bizzzatch350 said, there's a lot of work that goes into those things and it's expensive. 396 is cost effective, can do the deed and is still durable. For what you might pay for a 420 something CI LT1, you could do a 396 with a helluva power adder.
Old 05-06-2004, 04:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fahad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: kuwait
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What about 409ci LT1, need spec of 409ci?? did LT1 have another block, like LS1's (C5R)?? Why most people use 383 & 396?? i heard from many.. the 383 is better for street race and 396 is better for NOS and track what's your opinion's of that guys??

Thanks for advance..
Old 05-06-2004, 10:56 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
dhdenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monticello, Kentucky
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

409 is just .030" over and a 4" crank. I think the main reason this setup isn't used much is due to clearancing for the larger crank. Probably not quite as durable. As far as 383's and 396's having duties in different realms, I don't think it matters. With a stroker, you'll just make more TQ the bigger you go, you can run bigger cams, and all that good stuff.
Old 05-07-2004, 12:32 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Fahad
What about 409ci LT1, need spec of 409ci?? did LT1 have another block, like LS1's (C5R)?? Why most people use 383 & 396?? i heard from many.. the 383 is better for street race and 396 is better for NOS and track what's your opinion's of that guys??

Thanks for advance..
409s are far less durable. It's such a long stroke, and piston to oil pan clearance is zilch.
Old 05-07-2004, 03:10 PM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Elysian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by enisguy
409s are far less durable. It's such a long stroke, and piston to oil pan clearance is zilch.
What, exactly, has to be clearanced?
Old 05-07-2004, 04:13 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Elysian
What, exactly, has to be clearanced?
I didn't word it right, but what I meant was the piston at the bottom of it's stroke and how close it is to the oil pan.
Old 05-07-2004, 04:24 PM
  #17  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Elysian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So is there anything else that would need to be clearanced to make a 409?
Old 06-29-2004, 03:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
V8_DSM_V8again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/7610/dyno.htm

409 Cubic Inches: LT1 motor

TPIS 409, from Hi-Tech Performance March 1997

350 LT1 block, .100 over

Callies 3.875" steel crank

Manley 4340 5.85" steel rods

Ross 11.2:1 pistons

Ported LT1 heads, 2.00/1.56" valves

TPIS Miniram intake, 58mm throttle body, 30lb/hr injectors

TPIS ZZ9 or 409 cam, both tested: 409- 225/225 @ .050, .525/.525 lift, 112deg sep; ZZ9-212/226 @ .050, .483/.520 lift, 112deg sep
Old 06-29-2004, 05:48 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (53)
 
dhdenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monticello, Kentucky
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V8_DSM_V8again
350 LT1 block, .100 over
Now how'd they do that? I have never heard of that!
Old 06-29-2004, 05:54 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
RacinLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DE
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

had to be sleeved for .100 over,at .060 the walls are paper thin.

the reason 383 and 396 are so popular is because they are readily available parts. there is no "race" lt1 block,although there are rumors of a dozen or so "bowtie block LT1's" out there. GM scrapped that program when they swapped to the LS1.


Quick Reply: Maximum bore LT1.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.