Adjustable vs Non-adjustable rear suspension components
For reference here are the two versions I'm looking at:
Non-adjustable: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/up...20-b/overview/
Adjustable: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/up...29-b/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/up...21-r/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/upi-201829-b
Is it simply that one is on-car adjustable? Are there other differences? What does the rod end get me over the more traditional design?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
"Polyurethane bushings used on both ends of the control arm. This type of a control arm is best used for drag racing. The bushings however, limit the rear end from articulating. Many drag cars can get away with this because of the way the car is set up. If this type of arm is used on the street or road race applications the rear suspension will be placed in bind when the car goes over bumps and around corners. This is because the control arm bushings will not allow the rear end to have proper movement.
Consequences: High speed oversteer, possible over stressing the suspension mount, reduces tire loading during cornering and ride change."
I HATE the front lower arm bushing design. I wish it'd be two straight bushings in-line like the upper arms. And why hasn't the aftermarket (UMI & BMR) made a K-frame and lower control arms with in-line bushings?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/upi-2016-b
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/upi-5022-b/overview/









