LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

1994 LT1 Cheyenne dyno run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2017, 06:17 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1994 LT1 Cheyenne dyno run

After doing my LT1/T56 swap and stuffed my rearend with a 4.11 posi me and my friend went to a dyno day in Dover,TN and the truck did pretty good for a few bolt ons and custom exhaust.

​​​​​
​​​​​
Old 04-24-2017, 07:48 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,707
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Well what did it make?
Old 04-24-2017, 09:05 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I put it in the video description but it made 296rwhp and 328rwtq with the usual bolt ons.
Old 04-27-2017, 09:48 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got a plan to see if I put a set of 1.6 rockers and a ATI balancer will send it past the 300rwhp mark.
Old 04-29-2017, 04:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The 1.6 rr will push you over the 300 mark if you are at 296 now. Not only do i recommend 1.6 rr I also like to swap to 7/16 studs,3/8 guide plates, chromolly pushrods and new valvesprings.csome say its overkill but its worth it.
Old 04-29-2017, 06:44 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96lt1m6
The 1.6 rr will push you over the 300 mark if you are at 296 now. Not only do i recommend 1.6 rr I also like to swap to 7/16 studs,3/8 guide plates, chromolly pushrods and new valvesprings.csome say its overkill but its worth it.
It's always good to be precautionary in the upgrades, but I am also thinking take the engine out and do a 380ci and a bigger cam being that it's at 137,000 miles and it is about time for a rebuild.
Old 04-30-2017, 10:29 AM
  #7  
Launching!
 
cuisinartvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Valencia Ca
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Do it youll love it on that truck wiht the 6 spd
You can stay on budget, port the stockers with same valves, cleanup the intake a bit add a reasonable (not big) cam, about any header youll love it.
Old 05-01-2017, 09:16 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
Do it youll love it on that truck wiht the 6 spd
You can stay on budget, port the stockers with same valves, cleanup the intake a bit add a reasonable (not big) cam, about any header youll love it.
Well I found that Lingenfelter has some ported heads for $900 so I may try them later after the stroker kit and I found Lingenfelter has a .566 lift I may try during the short block rebuild.
Old 05-02-2017, 11:55 AM
  #9  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,060
Received 541 Likes on 391 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1970CSTLT1
Well I found that Lingenfelter has some ported heads for $900 so I may try them later after the stroker kit and I found Lingenfelter has a .566 lift I may try during the short block rebuild.
What cam is it? The 211/219? If you do that combo with their CNC heads and exhaust to accommodate you should be looking at around 370rwhp, and if you do a stroker you'll be looking at a gaggle of torque. That cam in that truck will make it a hoot to drive. However if you are wanting some lope in your idle you'll want to consider a more aggressive cam profile.
Old 05-02-2017, 02:22 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
What cam is it? The 211/219? If you do that combo with their CNC heads and exhaust to accommodate you should be looking at around 370rwhp, and if you do a stroker you'll be looking at a gaggle of torque. That cam in that truck will make it a hoot to drive. However if you are wanting some lope in your idle you'll want to consider a more aggressive cam profile.
It's the .219/.219 duration .560/.560 lift cam
Old 05-02-2017, 03:57 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1970CSTLT1
......and I found Lingenfelter has a .566 lift I may try during the short block rebuild.
Yep.....yo are old-school.

Originally Posted by SS RRR
What cam is it? The 211/219? If you do that combo with their CNC heads and exhaust to accommodate you should be looking at around 370rwhp....
Not unless the dyno is aimed downhill

The best heads can be held back by a cam that 'has no legs'. In pursuit of a hi-performance stroker, this cam has no legs.

Originally Posted by 1970CSTLT1
It's the .219/.219 duration .560/.560 lift cam
Would do good to to 350hp to the wheels IMO. On the whole, this cam is no more capable than the HOT cam.

The Comp Cams 503 is the minimum cam I'd use if the CR is less than 11.5:1. With well ported heads (let stipulate that the Lingenfelters are well ported), the 503 in a stroker can reach the 400hp range, be easily tuned, and provide great drivability.

KW
Old 05-02-2017, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,060
Received 541 Likes on 391 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1970CSTLT1
It's the .219/.219 duration .560/.560 lift cam
That cam was designed more for the long runners of the TPI cars. I wouldn't use it if you are still using a short runner intake. The 211/219 cam would better suit you if you are wanting a mild cam.

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
Not unless the dyno is aimed downhill
The best heads can be held back by a cam that 'has no legs'. In pursuit of a hi-performance stroker, this cam has no legs
I'm not sure where it's been stated the OP is looking for a "high performance stroker..." If that is the case then absolutely there are better combos out there, but for something that may only see street duty and still pass emissions the 211 cam in a stroker would be great for a truck. I had a 211/219 cam, LPE heads, LT headers with stock displacement, dynoed 370rwhp and 355rwtq. Did a best of 12.09 @ 115.5, 3750lb race weight at a sea level track. It does alright for itself for a mild street combo.
Old 05-02-2017, 04:19 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
.....I had a 211/219 cam, LPE heads, LT headers with stock displacement, dynoed 370rwhp and 355rwtq.....
I don't see it.....but I'll take you on your word.

KW
Old 05-02-2017, 04:31 PM
  #14  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,060
Received 541 Likes on 391 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

If not the dyno then the track times and mph back it up.
Old 05-02-2017, 05:58 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well if I don't go LPE cam I'll go with the biggest AI cam for stock long blocks.
Ai 230 / 238 - .566" / .566" - 110 LSA
An excellent choice for 3.73-4.10 geared M6 cars. Typically makes peak power at 6200-6400rpm in stock LT1 long blocks. A4 cars need 3.73 gearing & a minimum 3400 rpm converter.
Old 05-03-2017, 09:23 AM
  #16  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,060
Received 541 Likes on 391 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

That may be a pretty damn good choice as well. If paired with LPE heads, they ain't no slouch!
Old 05-05-2017, 03:31 AM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I forgot the I still haven't had the ecm dyno tune yet either I just had my tuner do a tune at his home for a 93 octane and the bolt ons that I have so there might be a few horses he could squeeze out of it when I have that done.
Old 05-05-2017, 04:45 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I am a HUGE fan of the LPE 211/219 cam. It provides smooth power across the board. This cam is underestimated by many but always proves itself.
Old 05-05-2017, 10:08 AM
  #19  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,060
Received 541 Likes on 391 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 96lt1m6
I am a HUGE fan of the LPE 211/219 cam. It provides smooth power across the board. This cam is underestimated by many but always proves itself.
Exactly. My combo made 100rwhp more than stock, retained the same power curve (only higher) went 70,000 miles of hard driving and would still get 25 to 27mpg freeway and low 20's in town. Started hearing a tick and no valve adjustment would solve the issue. Looked through the lifter bores and voila. I definitely got my money's worth.
Old 05-17-2017, 08:45 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1970CSTLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atwood, TN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm probably going to save some of the extra money for AFR 195cc heads, 380ci, custom Lunati cam, and either a ported stock intake or a TPIS Super Ram.


Quick Reply: 1994 LT1 Cheyenne dyno run



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.