LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

(L99) 4.3L V8 (Possibly Building A Stroker...)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2017, 02:09 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default (L99) 4.3L V8 (Possibly Building A Stroker...)

First off. Don't want any Negative Comments. Not here for that. I've learned that my 4.3L Block does have a Stock 9.025 Deck Height. I also learned that it has a Factory 305 SBC Bore. I had in mind maybe doing a 3.48 Crank, 5.7 Rod and then it would be an LT Based 305. But what I have seen along with that is people doing a 334 Stroker SBC. Why wouldn't I be able to do this? Been thinking heavy on it. 3.75 Crank, 1 Piece Rear Main Seal. Then a 30 Thousandths over Piston. Just confused if I should use a 5.7 Rod or not with that Stroke Crank. Thoughts?
Old 12-23-2017, 02:12 PM
  #2  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No, I'm not (JUST SWAPPING IN AN LT1) neither. Again, want to try something different.
Old 12-23-2017, 07:17 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Wanna be different? Cool.

Actually, the L99 had a 3.736" bore where as the 305ci had a 3.700 bore.

You can use the same rotating assembly as you would use in a stroker LT1, but you'd have to use custom pistons.....

I mean, you can't just put in a different crank and rods and use the same pistons.

And AFAIK, there are no off the shelf pistons for a 3.736" or a 3.766" bore that will go with a 3.75" crank with 5.7" or 6" rods.

KW
Old 12-23-2017, 07:27 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/uem-ic835-030

So then what is this? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Old 12-23-2017, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not being a D*ck, but I'd go and double check on a 305 SBC Bore too. I been on this all Day man lol. 😂
Old 12-23-2017, 07:45 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh, and if you go to that Link, Click on the Application right under the Picture of the Piston I just put the Link up for...
Old 12-25-2017, 01:09 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by L99Caprice
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/uem-ic835-030

So then what is this? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Go for it!

KW
Old 12-25-2017, 01:40 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Think I may have to man. Need at least over 300 Cubes lol. 😂
Old 12-25-2017, 11:18 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If memory serves me correctly, Mark McPhail and Jon Moss built a 4.3 stroker with Lt1 parts and came up with a 302 ci sset up it did not make real good power without using much higher RPM. That thing is screaming Forced Induction
Old 12-25-2017, 11:31 AM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That makes it 305 Cubic Inches my Friend. With a 9.025 Deck Height, 3.736 Bore, 3.48 Stroke, 5.7 Rod. That makes it a 305 LTx my man. Calculator says so, before we get into a Pissing Contest over it lol. 😂😂😂😂
Old 12-25-2017, 08:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

302, 305, 307 it does not really matter, the point is you are going to have a small CI motor that requires a bunch of RPM but still makes very low TQ..... Where is the gain for the $$$$ spent?
Old 12-25-2017, 08:28 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, from what I have seen, nobody else has made a 334 Cube LTx Stroker before out of an L99. I want to be that guy and do it Successfully my man. That's all. Make decent Power and move this Caprice around Spiritually. Nothing crazy. Just a Balanced and Blueprinted 334 LTx that can Rev 7,000 RPM with no issue. Which means Strong Rod Bolts (ARP 625's) and Balancing to the Max and have decent flowing Heads up top. Not trying to Gap nobody up. Just a Fun Caprice with the First Stroked to 334 Cube L99.
Old 12-25-2017, 08:43 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I gotcha

You will most likely have to ditch the OPTI to attain that RPM successfully long term. TQhead 24X should be on your menu
Old 12-25-2017, 08:49 PM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't plan on beating the ***** out of my Car everyday like that. Just there when I need it. Casual Drive. Maybe Small (Skert, Skert) every now and then lol.
Old 12-25-2017, 09:52 PM
  #15  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,006
Received 518 Likes on 374 Posts

Default

You will be disappointed. If not at first, a short time later. Especially after you get beat by stock 4cyl. imports all the time. Everyone will wonder why your **** is so slow. Don’t do it, son.
Old 12-26-2017, 07:02 AM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
You will be disappointed. If not at first, a short time later. Especially after you get beat by stock 4cyl. imports all the time. Everyone will wonder why your **** is so slow. Don’t do it, son.
Why not? Only thing I lack is a 4 Inch Bore like a Regular 350 SBC. Will actually have the same Stroke as a 383 Stroker being 3.750. Jumping to Conclusions ain't cool man. Not at all.
Old 12-26-2017, 07:14 AM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Also need to keep in mind, my Heads flow way better then a Gen 1 SBC and will be Ported and Polished. I mean it's a 3.750 Stroked Gen 2 we Talking about. What in your Head makes you think my Car will be an absolute Turd? What, a 3.736 Bored to a 3.766 Cylinder Diameter?
Old 12-26-2017, 10:06 AM
  #18  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,006
Received 518 Likes on 374 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by L99Caprice
Why not? Only thing I lack is a 4 Inch Bore like a Regular 350 SBC. Will actually have the same Stroke as a 383 Stroker being 3.750. Jumping to Conclusions ain't cool man. Not at all.
It doesn't matter if you have the same stroke it's not going to be the same as a 383 because it will not have the same displacement. You'll make the same shitty power with maybe a little more torque and that's if you put decent heads and cam on it. Judging by your other thread it looks like you're going down the road to Failville as well, but go ahead and try to reinvent the wheel.
I'm telling you, if what you're trying actually made power it would've been done long ago.
Old 12-26-2017, 11:19 AM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

It seems like you don't have crazy high specific goals, so if you want to have fun and be different, go for it.

Just keep in mind performance will likely not be what you expect, since you seem to be building a high strung, high RPM, small V8 for a big heavy car that wants power under the curve and lots of torque to get moving. Basically a motor that would be more at home in a 2500lb RX7 body instead of a massive 4+ Caprice.

Personally, I would consider two routes:
- If you are dead set on keeping that motor, and are on more of a budget, I would go as large as safely possible (likely 40-60 over - Gizmo has gone 60 over an an L99 but it was drag only so 40 would be the safe bet). Use a good medium sized torquey cylinder head like the 21* trickflow heads or ported stockers, and at MAX a mid 230s duration cam. You will make likely close to 330-350rwhp without getting too expensive. It will want to rev...expect to use most of the stock ECUs 7200 rpm limit.

- Second choice, a lot more expensive but will make a ton more power, is to take your L99 crank and throw it into an LT1 block for a destroked LT1. I know you don't want to ditch your block for whatever reason, but destroking an LT1 makes a hell of a lot more sense then stroking an L99. This gives you the bigger bore for much better cylinder head selection, easier to source pistons, and a short stroke for a crazy high RPM monster. You will need better heads then the other build, an aftermarket ECU will be a must to get the RPMs you will need, and I would also run shaftmount rockers as well. Don't forget supporting mods will be more expensive as well - stronger pushrods, quality hub+damper, etc. I would aim for 8,000 RPM, and to be honest I would go with a tight lash HIPPO solid roller. It will be very expensive, but likely sound like nothing else and be a pretty cool build...although more at home road racing in a light car then a big heavy caprice.

To be clear, I think both choices are terrible price:performance and wouldn't recommend either - but I am just trying to provide the information you are asking for . None of us can talk too much **** about not being worth it to mod a motor when we use boat anchor LT1s vs a junkyard LQ9 6 liter LS that can be had for pennies and make insane power for a fraction of what an LT1 would cost to match.
Old 12-26-2017, 10:38 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
L99Caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Princeton, West Virginia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Appreciate your input my man... Really do... Yes, I am keeping the L99 Block lol...


Quick Reply: (L99) 4.3L V8 (Possibly Building A Stroker...)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.