how much rwhp have you made with bolt-ons on LT1? looking to hit 320-330s
#22
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
I meant they seem to respond better due to the fact that they have worse parts already on them, compared to the stock parts on ls1s. Just my opinion, but im stickin' to it.
These motors are indeed good motors if taken care of, I ran the time in my sig with the only power mod a catback.
These motors are indeed good motors if taken care of, I ran the time in my sig with the only power mod a catback.
Point taken. It was a little misleading on the first post. I just wanted to comment on it because it seems too often that threads like this get some LS1 vs LT1 mudslinging going due to people misunderstanding one another
#26
The headers on the LT1 are more restrictive out of the factory than the LS1's. My friend got some nice LT kooks on his LS1 and only made 2rwhp from them. He told me, the stock LS1 headers didn't flow that bad. Nothing compared to the crappy stock headers on an LT1. When I got my LT's put on, it was a pretty big difference. I took my friend for a ride and he even said he could feel a big change. This is with the LT4 KM installed as well. My friend with the SS said, he felt a slight difference in his car when he put the Lt's on it, but not much...
#27
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Camaro 0wner
The headers on the LT1 are more restrictive out of the factory than the LS1's. My friend got some nice LT kooks on his LS1 and only made 2rwhp from them. He told me, the stock LS1 headers didn't flow that bad. Nothing compared to the crappy stock headers on an LT1. When I got my LT's put on, it was a pretty big difference. I took my friend for a ride and he even said he could feel a big change. This is with the LT4 KM installed as well. My friend with the SS said, he felt a slight difference in his car when he put the Lt's on it, but not much...
#28
Originally Posted by METALBEAST
There is something wrong with his car then. I have YET to see an LS1 gain LESS than 15 RWHP untuned with the addition of a set of LTs. LS1 headers don't flow bad??? Take a look a how restrictive they are. I love my LT1s but I know fact from fiction.
#31
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clear lake TX (From LaPorte)
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran a 13.6 before i got my cam, springs, 1.6 rockers, pcm tune, and clutch all on street tires. I think i was at 70k. The car was only taken to the track once or twice with full bolt-ons, so im sure it could have improved.
#34
11 Second Club
iTrader: (29)
94Z-28 120,000 ,miles M6 3.42gears
5.21.2004
Stock with CAI
275rwhp 317rwtq
5.21.2004
CAI, Open cutout, PCMforless TuneSame day
285rwhp 319rwtq
3.9.2005
Every Bolt-on
1.7 RR, Pace long tubes, 2.5 True duals with X pipe, 52mm TB, LT4 KM, LS1 Ram Air Lid, Ls1 driveshaft, Custom Tune(By self),Underdrive pulley,CSI Electric WP,
327rwhp 350rwtq
When i ran 12.29 in Houston the car only put down 314rwhp and 332rwtq because my fuel presure regulator was bad, A/F went from 13.1 too 15.7 in one run.
5.21.2004
Stock with CAI
275rwhp 317rwtq
5.21.2004
CAI, Open cutout, PCMforless TuneSame day
285rwhp 319rwtq
3.9.2005
Every Bolt-on
1.7 RR, Pace long tubes, 2.5 True duals with X pipe, 52mm TB, LT4 KM, LS1 Ram Air Lid, Ls1 driveshaft, Custom Tune(By self),Underdrive pulley,CSI Electric WP,
327rwhp 350rwtq
When i ran 12.29 in Houston the car only put down 314rwhp and 332rwtq because my fuel presure regulator was bad, A/F went from 13.1 too 15.7 in one run.