View Poll Results: Which one in suitable for my performance?
Long tube
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/clear.gif)
164
80.39%
Mid
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/clear.gif)
30
14.71%
Short
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar4-l.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar4.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar4-r.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/clear.gif)
10
4.90%
Voters: 204. You may not vote on this poll
Short or mid or long tube headers?
#41
Staging Lane
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Regardless of future modifications you will get more with longtubes, although shorties might be an alternative at your current state of mods. For what it is worth, shorties are not cheap and you can get a pair of longtubes for the same price, might as well get longtubes.
#43
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by firebird_fury
Regardless of future modifications you will get more with longtubes, although shorties might be an alternative at your current state of mods. For what it is worth, shorties are not cheap and you can get a pair of longtubes for the same price, might as well get longtubes.
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Shorties here 1/5/8 with a 2/1/2 collector welded up to CATS shoved right up into the engine bay (as per emissions spec. on the GTO). I also run a 2/1/4 catback and 3200 stall.
12.2@112 all stock motor and 11.9@114 212-220 cam only.
Dynos mean ****. Ive always dynoed low compared to most ppl. out there. Settle the war where its fought - at the track.
12.2@112 all stock motor and 11.9@114 212-220 cam only.
Dynos mean ****. Ive always dynoed low compared to most ppl. out there. Settle the war where its fought - at the track.
#48
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Id go with the long tubes and true duals. When I had my 1997 Trans Am I had Hooker long tubes with 2.5" true duals, CAI, 3.73, pulleys, reprogrammer, adj. fuel pressure regulator, pretty much bolt on's. It had a great mph (110mph) I dont remember the time, I was surprised to see that mph for the mods I had.
#51
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by blkchevyz
well i proved that you dont gain anything on bolt ons and a cam car going to long tubes from shorties.
and i had shorty 1 5/8s headers
i love how all these people say shorties are worthless and they have never ran them.
and i had shorty 1 5/8s headers
i love how all these people say shorties are worthless and they have never ran them.
#52
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My JetHot Longtubes should be removed in a week or so (can find out from Gforce when exactly) and I'm going to Kooks LTs and will sell these cheap if your interested. I paid $520, they are about 2 yrs old, in good shape send me a pm if your interested. Only reason I'm upgrading is I'm stroking, they were good headers.
Originally Posted by BadCamaro
Which one will be better for my mods with stock head
my mods will be
cam 305 or 503 (not yet decided)
converter 3000 TCI
3.73
y -pipe 2.5''
Flowtech muffler ( cat-back)
BBK 52
ram air
mass air
ported intake
tune
my mods will be
cam 305 or 503 (not yet decided)
converter 3000 TCI
3.73
y -pipe 2.5''
Flowtech muffler ( cat-back)
BBK 52
ram air
mass air
ported intake
tune
#55
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by hz28
I agree. I have Shorties and true duals without clearanse problems.... I think i can have the extra 10hps with other mod and dont be hitting the paviment all the time...
#56
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Shackleford
How much of a horsepower gain would I see with the addition of Edelbrock shorties to a completely stock exhaust?
so thats probably around 25-30
#58
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Evil Eric
What that guy said. I always assume that since this is a performance board its about how to make the most power, not how to get around laws. I assume thats what the original poster wanted. I dont recall the original poster saying anything about having a lowered car or emissions so I dont know why people brought that up.