LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8
View Poll Results: Would you like a composite Intake manifold?
Yes, less heat, lighter, and nicer.
68
88.31%
No, i like my cinder block intake!
9
11.69%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

composite intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2007, 02:40 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (78)
 
Mike96z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by T/A KID
http://home.wideopenwest.com/~squinn0039/ltx.html

Here ya go.

If I didn't like the way the new Edelbrock intake looked and wanted to mess around I would do a Converted Dual plane intake with a Elbow and monoblade. I think it would do better than most single planes below 6500RPM IMO.

YES! That is the manifold I am talking about. But the only thing is.......ANYONE with access to the tools can make one.
Old 03-30-2007, 03:11 PM
  #42  
Staging Lane
 
Camaro Bird 1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike96z
YES! That is the manifold I am talking about. But the only thing is.......ANYONE with access to the tools can make one.
no ****!

and the price is stupid rediculous....

just get a good die grinder and tig welder an make ur own.
Old 03-30-2007, 10:44 PM
  #43  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
A-man930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So these distribution problems that have been discussed, are they primarily at idle? Or are we talking about a major thing here?
Old 03-30-2007, 10:53 PM
  #44  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

in NA applications with boltons its a problem. but in H/C its a little less of a problem.

now FI, its gone
Old 03-31-2007, 06:15 PM
  #45  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Revelation Z28
in NA applications with boltons its a problem. but in H/C its a little less of a problem.

now FI, its gone


No...it's a problem on either.
Old 04-01-2007, 02:51 AM
  #46  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by otherwhitemeat
No...it's a problem on either.
dam
Old 04-01-2007, 09:23 AM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
The Big Show's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: That Southern Fried Space City
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T/A KID
http://home.wideopenwest.com/~squinn0039/ltx.html

Here ya go.

If I didn't like the way the new Edelbrock intake looked and wanted to mess around I would do a Converted Dual plane intake with a Elbow and monoblade. I think it would do better than most single planes below 6500RPM IMO.
Thats Steve's old setup from a couple years ago. I don't think he really posts much anymore but he's a class act and definitely set some milestones for n/a LT1's...

It's funny how people automatically think dual plane's are like taboo or sumin'. It's all about usable rpm range and what you want to do with your car.
Old 04-01-2007, 12:24 PM
  #48  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
A-man930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So we're talking about a semi-major design flaw here? Why don't the LS-style intakes (with the TB in front) have distribution problems as well? Does anyone here utilize a carb-style dual plane as described earlier?
Old 04-02-2007, 03:23 PM
  #49  
Staging Lane
 
Lazlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default



Do you think something like this might help with the distribution? Basically build a sheet metal box inside the intake to seperate the front 4 cylinders from the rear. You'd have to match the volume of both sides but it would prevent the first 4 from "stealing" air from the last 4. My other idea was using 2 stock TBs, one on the front and one on the back of the intake(where egr usually is) but I don't think there's enough room.

Last edited by Lazlo; 04-02-2007 at 04:50 PM.
Old 04-02-2007, 04:27 PM
  #50  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Lazlo


Do you think something like this might help with the distribution? Basically build a sheet metal box inside the intake to seperate the front 4 cylinders from the rear. You'd have to match the volume of both sides but it would prevent the first 4 from "stealing" air from the last 4. My other idea was using 2 stock TBs, one on the front and one on the back of the intake(where egr usually is) but I don't think there's enough room.

why would anyone go through all that work when you can just get a carb style intake and fix everything.
Old 04-05-2007, 06:41 PM
  #51  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
A-man930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by otherwhitemeat
why would anyone go through all that work when you can just get a carb style intake and fix everything.
I still want to see a pic... would you use a 90 degree elbow or a carb-style TB



Quick Reply: composite intake manifold



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.