1.6 rockers?
Cappy, I already have Crane Gold 1.6's, on a stock cam, you'd recommend against using them?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Crane makes stamped 1.6 non-roller that are both SA and non-SA. I know, I bought a set a few years back heh. If you're that pressed for cash, I guess stamped 1.6 roller-tip is better than nothing. Just make sure whatever you get is 86 and new for Self Aligning.
They are all Silver from what I have seen, my Dad owns a beautiful 1996 Collectors Edition LT4 M6, and his are Silver Bowtie 1.6 RR's.
If you do find the Factory LT4's, they will not work on the LT1 3/8" Rocker Studs, you need LT4 7/16" Studs.
I could've SWORE the 1.6 were Blue, but I think you're right :\ What I didn't know is Crane makes them o_0
Anyways, you could go absolutely insane and get some LS1 1.8s

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1-8-x...04826159QQrdZ1
Or here's a set of the Sliver 1.6's that are fairly cheep atm.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevy...99894686QQrdZ1
Now, I don't know what stud size LT1's use, thats my only bit of misguidance I might be giving. The above are 3/8, and I think the ones we use are 7/16, but someone please correct me.
Here's a stamp set of 1.6 roller tip 3/8 for $60 (new)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/New-S...99923099QQrdZ1
Same ones, but 7/16 for $160 :S
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/New-S...99923084QQrdZ1
No-name full roller 3/8 and 7/16 for $118 (same seller, just check his listings)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-A...15513162QQrdZ1
I DID NOT CHECK TO SEE IF ANY OF THESE ARE SELF ALIGNING. So read through and make sure if they are or are not. If they don't say, email the seller.
Cappy, I already have Crane Gold 1.6's, on a stock cam, you'd recommend against using them?

this is my "rant" over in ls1lt1.com because a guy tried to make me look dumb when I said that aluminum rockers werent for daily drivers and only from strip machines.
Lt4's came with aluminum 1.6s and they were designed to be driven daily
""designed" yea maybe,the more correct term would be it was cheap and passed our safety factors so GM produced it.
well have you ever heard of a thing called engineering metallic fatigue?
under a cyclic load and with high temperatures present in the cylinder head it can cause fatigue in a lower strength metal such as Aluminum, not only that but aluminum also has both lower possions ratio and lower shear and elasticity moduli
This leads to rocker arms failing at the fulcrum, I have seen happen many times, on "quality" aluminum rockers such as the Crane gold.
Let me give you an example a plain jane 1040 Steel alloy has a Yield strength rating of 60500 PSI, while the hardcore 7075 Aluminum alloy has a yield strength rating of 15000 PSI, huge difference.
my point is these aluminum parts e.g. rockers or connecting rods are meant to be used in short bursts, like a race car, there is to great a chance of failure if used normally for long periods of time on cyclic loading.
Im not saying they wont work, but I wouldnt put them in my car"
Last edited by Captainofiron; Apr 15, 2007 at 10:28 AM.


