LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2007, 10:26 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Millr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo?

Hi. new to the forum.

I'm fixing to revive my 95 Z28 from the dead, and i was thinking about doing a single turbo setup.
But I was wondering why I don't see very many done to LT1s, even on the fastest LT1s list.
Anything I should know before i start spending money and time :X
Old 05-20-2007, 11:22 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
SlowGreenTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive seen a few, but there arent alot here. I know of one build in particular, just because I know the guy. Used to be his roomate, and im good firends with his brother (frcefed98, one of the FI moderators is a good firend of mine, his brother is the car thats being worked on). His thread for his build is here:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...0&page=1&pp=20

Page 3 has some more pics. He'll probablly be posting more soon, Ive seen the new pics with the coated stuff hung on the car and with all the pipe routing done.

Theres another guy I see posting in this section from time to time. "Dragframe". He has a turbo setup I think, but I dont know the specifics. Theres also a Red LT1 Camaro ive seen in the FI section with a TT setup thats pretty unique. **edit: Intmd8 is the guy I was thinking of for the TT setup. You can find his website and stuff with all the pics**


Turbo setups are alot of work, And if you cant find a kit you need to be decent at doing fab work and welding to get it done. Even if you find a kit, you'll probablly need to do slight modifications to your setup to get it to work, its just the way these things have gone that ive seen. We're planning on doing one for my car, but still in the planning and engine buildup stages. Its alot of little things to get a turbo setup going. If you browse around the Forced Induction section of the forums you'll probablly turn up more information than you can use.

-Josh

Last edited by SlowGreenTA; 05-20-2007 at 11:32 AM.
Old 05-20-2007, 12:03 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Millr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I appreciate it
Old 05-20-2007, 02:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There are a few of us around.
Old 05-20-2007, 04:07 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
 
IROCthisZ28forLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there are a few guys around that have the set ups, but it seems like a LOT or work...IM trying to do research myself as I also want to boost my Z, but a front mount set up, but it seems to be a heck of a lot cheaper to rear mouint it
Old 05-20-2007, 04:37 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
Kelly.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO (6200ft altitude =/ )
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the biggest problem i have found is finding a good way to manage the whole thing.
you pretty much have to step up to a full standalone as there arent many other good options.
Old 05-20-2007, 05:46 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Millr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

another thing i think will be a major problem is space. we all know you can't sit in the engine bay and tinker like you can in older models =/
Old 05-20-2007, 08:06 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I suspect the front mounts are more expensive because you have to replace the exhaust manifolds.
As mentioned above, space in the engine bay is at a premium, so anything you add in there makes access to everything more difficult.
The downside to a rear mount is the length of the intake tubing and the oil lines to the turbo.
Any turbo requires major tuning once implemented, plus all the extra items, such as larger injectors, gauges, etc.
Old 05-21-2007, 12:42 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Millr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i do appreciate all of the informative responses.
I might just stick to motor on this one.
Old 05-21-2007, 12:46 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
LT1MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,722
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

you can do plenty to your ol z28 all motor, and still be dependable, not that all turbo's aren't dependable. $3K+ for a turbo setup, you can well work over your motor for that and be real happy.
Old 05-21-2007, 01:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
Hark_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heads/Cam + nitrous is a very common and effective direction to go in
Old 05-21-2007, 01:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kelly.
the biggest problem i have found is finding a good way to manage the whole thing.
you pretty much have to step up to a full standalone as there arent many other good options.
i constructed a turbo system for my lt1 a few yrs. back using a holset
turbo, using a scavenge pump for the oil drainback since it was mounted rather low, taking the place where the driver side cat was located, then routed the intake plumbing to a horizontal mounted ic that i made from 2
supra cores, feeding into a k&n plenum intake and 1le elbow. i used
30 lb. svo injectors and a 12:1 fmu at about 8 psi. car ran really strong.
i would have to say as strong or stronger than the 383 with ported lt4 heads
and intake combo i had, although the 383 had th400 and athe turbo was
a t56. but the 383 car was a mid 10's on 175 tb plate shot.
wideband o2's were not as available at the time. but the car stayed together
for over 2 yrs., until the guy i sold it wrecked it.
bottom end was rebuilt with sbc forged pistons and rings, on stock rods and crank, clevite bearings, stock heads and intake.
Old 05-22-2007, 07:57 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default Turbo

I was supercharged on my 95 383, made 648 RWHP on pump gas@ 12lbs of boost. I have removed the supercharger and going turbo, Front mount. When I get it in I will reveal the test results...
Old 05-22-2007, 08:33 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kelly.
the biggest problem i have found is finding a good way to manage the whole thing.
you pretty much have to step up to a full standalone as there arent many other good options.
Megasquirt is a good option to look into. Not only does it eliminate the opti, it also can be used up to 44lbs of boost as you can get a 4 bar map sensor to work with it.
Old 05-22-2007, 01:58 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
Megasquirt is a good option to look into. Not only does it eliminate the opti, it also can be used up to 44lbs of boost as you can get a 4 bar map sensor to work with it.
but if u go megasquirt, u might as well go sbc also and use sbc
single plane intake with elbow plenum along with some hi flow sbc heads and a edis 8 for ignition. might as well go better everything.
Old 05-23-2007, 12:35 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,933
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
but if u go megasquirt, u might as well go sbc also and use sbc
single plane intake with elbow plenum along with some hi flow sbc heads and a edis 8 for ignition. might as well go better everything.
Why? You don't need some super fancy intake or heads or anything to make more than enough power to be useless on the street.
Old 05-23-2007, 01:57 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1bdbrd
Why? You don't need some super fancy intake or heads or anything to make more than enough power to be useless on the street.
couldnt hurt
just alot more options for heads and intakes for the sbc
motors, the late model vortec truck engines are also rollers,
and it would bolt in place of a lt1, also it is alot easier to find the 4bolt main
vortec truck engines, just throwing some ideas out there
Old 05-23-2007, 09:10 PM
  #18  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Dragframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: wyoming @ 12000 DA...
Posts: 2,333
Received 64 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Im only 19 and have a turbo setup. I honestly still haven't got it together because its been tight lately. I still have injectors, fuel pump, wideband, and intake elbow to buy.

Hopefully soon I will get it done soon and get some vids up



Quick Reply: Turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.