LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LE heads go 10s N/A Drops 5/10th w/TH400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2008, 11:36 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TwoFast4Lv
(I was told here I would slow 2-4 tenths)

Who was that mouthy punk?
So what do you think made all the difference? Was it the relative zero DA (+/- 200ft), the 300lb weight drop (from your claimed 3800) or the improvement in the 60ft to 1.4s?
Old 06-05-2008, 11:39 AM
  #22  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default



this workday is gonna go by quick once this flamewar starts....
Old 06-05-2008, 11:42 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ellis gets bonus points for the sig

been forever since I chatted with you (lt1tech days)
awesome #s
Old 06-05-2008, 11:52 AM
  #24  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
So what do you think made all the difference? Was it the relative zero DA (+/- 200ft), the 300lb weight drop (from your claimed 3800) or the improvement in the 60ft to 1.4s?
3800 was back when it was a heads and cam motor. Keep up

Last time out (two years ago) she was going 11.4s-11.5s in the same weather and was tipping the scales at 3,650.

SO about the same weather, only lost 150Lbs and put in a TH400. The "informed" people here told me I would be slowing down 2-4 tenths and my combo was lack luster at best. Crappy LE heads and no name engine build.

Yeah they can kiss my white ***!
Old 06-05-2008, 11:59 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
1997bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

TwoFast4Lv must have one of those race only type setups!
Old 06-05-2008, 12:01 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1997bird
TwoFast4Lv must have one of those race only type setups!
LMFAO!!! Yeah I remember that when I drive it to work
Old 06-05-2008, 12:05 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
1997bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TwoFast4Lv
LMFAO!!! Yeah I remember that when I drive it to work
Yeah, I was just quoting one of "the informed people" off of this web site. That is not my official opinion however, just sarcasim at its best.
Old 06-05-2008, 12:12 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1997bird
Yeah, I was just quoting one of "the informed people" off of this web site. That is not my official opinion however, just sarcasim at its best.

that is exactly how I read it man

BTW Most do not even under stand the sig LOL!
Old 06-05-2008, 12:13 PM
  #29  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

SO about the same weather, only lost 150Lbs and put in a TH400. The "informed" people here told me I would be slowing down 2-4 tenths and my combo was lack luster at best. Crappy LE heads and no name engine build
Where is the link to the thread where this happened so i can read up and educate myself.....I musta missed it...

I wanna know what I should be running too setupwise....
Old 06-05-2008, 12:16 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
vanilla89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dallas tx
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good run ellis..

I'm trying to get my le2 383 in the 10's. Best pass so far is in the 11.20's, but mine still has a/c and a 4l60e.
Old 06-05-2008, 12:20 PM
  #31  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
So what do you think made all the difference? Was it the relative zero DA (+/- 200ft), the 300lb weight drop (from your claimed 3800) or the improvement in the 60ft to 1.4s?
You may not have meant it to, but that sure came across as whining!
Old 06-05-2008, 12:34 PM
  #32  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

RV grind 3/4 race cam, HIGH Stall 1600 Race Converter, Ported and Polished 48mm-tbody with coolant not by-passed, Twin Disk, ORY to Magnaflow Cats, 1000 Gallons per hour fuel pump, 24Lbs "Flow Batched" racing performance injectors and LS1 CAI.
hilarious sig..... same setup as i have....
Old 06-05-2008, 12:35 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimbob
You may not have meant it to, but that sure came across as whining!
Lol. Thanks for posting that great inference, it changed my day.

I just find it quaint how a car that is as "race car" as mine becomes grandma's grocery getter for the purposes of this post. I did claim that his car would slow down with the TH400 and I asked him to man up and post the results good or bad when he had them. I was wrong and his car did go faster/quicker. It wasn't an apples to apples comparison with the weight reduction, suspension changes, tire change and transbrake, but I'm happy for him.

It is interesting to see the rosey glow cast upon these times. The title of the thread says "LE heads go" which belittles the heaps of money and mods on this car.
Old 06-05-2008, 12:46 PM
  #34  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I did claim that his car would slow down with the TH400 and I asked him to man up and post the results good or bad when he had them. I was wrong and his car did go faster/quicker.
I usually stay out of these arguments but I had to ask this question. Why in gods name would you think that a car would slow down with a TH400???? Ellis didn't put a Th400 in from a Ford Econoline van.... It's obviously a race built RMVB TH400.... I lost 2 MPH and 50 RWHP from my swap from a T56 to a TH400 but went close to 4 tenths faster at the track... Not flaming you tireburnin at all but I wanted to hear the theory behind his car slowing down and where you would come up with that..

Weight notwithstanding cause MY setup was with ZERO other changes. no weight loss, no other mods, nothing... Just T56 to Th400..... T56 11.9@119, TH400 11.6@117..... so please explain this theory to me......
Old 06-05-2008, 12:53 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Colin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wichita/Derby, KS
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TwoFast4Lv
Again thanks Guys. How is your doing Collin? Damn nice ride when I seen it at the shoot out!

Outlaw PM sent!
Ehh....It's doing ok.....but I finally broke my 10 bolt so I'm shopping for a new rear axle at the moment.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-modifications/919868-lt1-vs-10-bolt-rear-axle.html


I haven't got to drive it since the first weekend in May. But hey at least it didn't break until after the shootout
Old 06-05-2008, 12:56 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
 
Hot94Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lexington,MO
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 06-05-2008, 12:59 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
 
SS Aleks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Congrats on making the whole car faster. It's funny that some people think the transmission counts for almost nothing (so I have been told about my car ). Welcome to the 10 sec N/A club! Do you have a break down of your previous best pass. It would be cool to see where it gained the most.
Old 06-05-2008, 01:03 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OutlawZ
I usually stay out of these arguments but I had to ask this question. Why in gods name would you think that a car would slow down with a TH400???? Ellis didn't put a Th400 in from a Ford Econoline van.... It's obviously a race built RMVB TH400.... I lost 2 MPH and 50 RWHP from my swap from a T56 to a TH400 but went close to 4 tenths faster at the track... Not flaming you tireburnin at all but I wanted to hear the theory behind his car slowing down and where you would come up with that..

Weight notwithstanding cause MY setup was with ZERO other changes. no weight loss, no other mods, nothing... Just T56 to Th400..... T56 11.9@119, TH400 11.6@117..... so please explain this theory to me......
He came from a built 4l60 with a big stall. They have a big first gear (numericlly) and a locking converter. He moved to a th400 with a similar stall and non locking converter. Lower first gear more parasitic loss on the big end.

His 150lb weight reduction was a easily a 1.5 tenths and 1.5 mph alone. His change to brand new radials could have been a mph alone. His 60ft dropped a thenth and would positively affect mph too. Transbrake/two step, who knows?

I believe a simple 4l60 to th400 swap (no 10 other changes) would have resulted in a slow down in MPH and likely ET. There is little driver error to correct for like in your t56 to th400 swap. The other changes likely had more effect on his times than the th400 alone. Madman did more for this cars ET than LE or a th400 did.
Old 06-05-2008, 01:15 PM
  #39  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

He came from a built 4l60 with a big stall. They have a big first gear (numericlly) and a locking converter. He moved to a th400 with a similar stall and non locking converter. Lower first gear more parasitic loss on the big end.

His 150lb weight reduction was a easily a 1.5 tenths and 1.5 mph alone. His change to brand new radials could have been a mph alone. His 60ft dropped a thenth and would positively affect mph too. Transbrake/two step, who knows?

I believe a simple 4l60 to th400 swap (no 10 other changes) would have resulted in a slow down in MPH and likely ET. There is little driver error to correct for like in your t56 to th400 swap. The other changes likely had more effect on his times than the th400 alone. Madman did more for this cars ET than LE or a th400 did
Okay I can see and understand your logic..... I'd have to ask Ellis about his previous tranny setup. was he shifting his old 4L60? most 4L60's I see are not RMVB setups and most put it in D and let the tranny shift itself.... loss of time right there. minimal but a loss. TH400's are neck crackers when you shift. I haven't ridden in a 4l60 car that shifts as hard as my ATI TH400 car does... Ultimately it really doesn't matter what comes from where and how much cuz there is no way to prove it.... The combo of his parts = a certain ET..... and his car picked up close to 1/2 second..... it wasn't all in the 60' (which was only 1 tenth better and equates to roughly 2 tenths at the big end) Weight loss.... yeah I'll give you a tenth on that.... It leaves 2 tenths on the table..... I think that's where the LE/TH400 combo helped..... but appreciate you saying where you came up with it......Your logic wasn't completely off base..... But 400's that are race built I think are entirely different animals than built 4L60's....
Old 06-05-2008, 01:22 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OutlawZ
Okay I can see and understand your logic..... I'd have to ask Ellis about his previous tranny setup. was he shifting his old 4L60? most 4L60's I see are not RMVB setups and most put it in D and let the tranny shift itself.... loss of time right there. minimal but a loss. TH400's are neck crackers when you shift. I haven't ridden in a 4l60 car that shifts as hard as my ATI TH400 car does... Ultimately it really doesn't matter what comes from where and how much cuz there is no way to prove it.... The combo of his parts = a certain ET..... and his car picked up close to 1/2 second..... it wasn't all in the 60' (which was only 1 tenth better and equates to roughly 2 tenths at the big end) Weight loss.... yeah I'll give you a tenth on that.... It leaves 2 tenths on the table..... I think that's where the LE/TH400 combo helped..... but appreciate you saying where you came up with it......Your logic wasn't completely off base..... But 400's that are race built I think are entirely different animals than built 4L60's....
Look at my signature. I am not a newbie.

My car has been through 2 th400s, a 4l60e, and a t56. I might have made this swap before and based my statements off some first hand information. I was wrong and he gained (good for him), but asserting that someone is il-informed when a ton of other changes were made after the original statement is retarded.


Quick Reply: LE heads go 10s N/A Drops 5/10th w/TH400



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.