LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Lloyd Elliot or Advanced Inductions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2008, 02:29 PM
  #21  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,042
Received 536 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLK,97,T/A,M-6
yes, true. compared to a head with a 185cc intake runner a 200cc head will make less torque, but more top end hp than the 185. considering all else is equal.
All you've done is throw this out with nothing to back your claim. How is this possible for cylinder heads alone to "make less torque/gain top end hp" running a larger head with no cam change? Can you explain why an engine "will make less torque..."?
Old 06-26-2008, 02:49 PM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

No velocity
Old 06-26-2008, 02:51 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Honestly, from what I've read and personally seen, both Lloyd Elliot and Advanced Induction are great products. Like someone else already said, go with your budget, either way it will be a good choice.
Old 06-26-2008, 03:29 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
DopdBrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Garden City, KS
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Flip a coin:

Heads, Lloyd
Tail, AI

That's about the easiest way to decide.
Old 06-26-2008, 03:34 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DopdBrd
Flip a coin:

Heads, Lloyd
Tail, AI

That's about the easiest way to decide.
That would only be true if the coin flipper felt that both products were exactly equal in terms of parts, work, service, results, quality, reliability etc.
Old 06-26-2008, 04:07 PM
  #26  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,042
Received 536 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
No velocity
I don't see how that is close to being possible since once again, there is no cylinder head design that could ever outflow the demands of an intake stroke. I can see velocity becoming an issue once the breathing characteristics have been changed once valve timing comes into play, but not with just heads. I installed ported heads which, comparatively typing, were monstrous compared to stock heads and the torque curve itself did not change, but increased in value.
This starts to touch on the age old argument where a good set of ported cylinder heads/stock cam will always outperform a larger cam/stock heads application (I don't mean just straight line performance). I believe it, just because of what needs to be done to a cam only application in order to take full advantage of the new power curve.
Old 06-26-2008, 04:15 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
DopdBrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Garden City, KS
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
That would only be true if the coin flipper felt that both products were exactly equal in terms of parts, work, service, results, quality, reliability etc.
I do feel that way. I drive a 400 RWHP LE2 bird that is very reliable and I would not hesitate to DD it whenever I needed to.

Researching, I found most people with the AI190 kit feel the same.
Old 06-26-2008, 05:17 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Either is a great Product IMHO

I have been using Lloyd's stuff for six years now.. Curently running 10s N/A as are a few with Phil's stuff


Both good products IMHO
Old 06-26-2008, 05:48 PM
  #29  
Restricted User
 
Jessica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
there is no cylinder head design that could ever outflow the demands of an intake stroke.
Wrong.... THERE IS NO 23° head that can outflow the downstroke of the piston in a 350 cube motor. There are real cylinder heads that do... and that's why in those more airflow does not equal more power reguardless of what the internet gurus tell you.

I think you misunderstand pumping losses and engine physics.

Jes
Old 06-26-2008, 05:48 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Both companies have great products. Only way to know which one is better is to call each and talk to them and that will allow you to decide which is the better fit for you. I was convinced I wanted to go with Ai until I called Lloyd one day and I flipped to that side. I had some communication issues with Ai which pissed me off and Lloyd proved to be the better fit for me. What is best in my opinion or anyone elses may not be best for you so definetly talk to them both but either way Im sure you will be satisfied.
Old 06-26-2008, 06:08 PM
  #31  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by StealthFormula
Both companies have great products. Only way to know which one is better is to call each and talk to them and that will allow you to decide which is the better fit for you. I was convinced I wanted to go with Ai until I called Lloyd one day and I flipped to that side. I had some communication issues with Ai which pissed me off and Lloyd proved to be the better fit for me. What is best in my opinion or anyone elses may not be best for you so definetly talk to them both but either way Im sure you will be satisfied.
Have you run product from either company?

Advanced Induction gets my vote.
Old 06-26-2008, 06:12 PM
  #32  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can see where SS RRR is coming from by saying that you won't lose torque with ported cylinder heads, the curve is just shifted up the RPM range. I don't 100% agree with that because the valve timing events of a camshaft determine when and where it wants the air flow, but generally it does happen. You will lose low rpm torque, but you might gain average torque over the whole rpm range.
Old 06-26-2008, 06:13 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Have you run product from either company?

Advanced Induction gets my vote.
Will in about a week and a half or so. One of my best friends has the LE1 heads and 1.3 camshaft and had some issues at first non related to that but ironed them out and got the car tuned and its great and hes very happy. Have another friend who ran an LE3 setup a couple years ago and liked it. Haven't ran any the Ai stuff but only hear great things such as the results from yourself.
Old 06-26-2008, 06:37 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Look at Alek's results on Advanced Induction's "results" page. Tell me that 355 is lacking torque. From memory 385 at 3400rpms and peaks at 418 somewhere up around 5100, peak HP is up about 6800-7000 and at the track he revs it to 7500rpms. That is a big wide useable powerband, making more torque than a lot of strokers, making good torque low and still having a high rpm capable motor.

A lot of the "this is the way it will be" comments like the lack of torque and such are based on information gathered from the average poor combo.
Old 06-26-2008, 07:10 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
aboatguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have AI 200s on my 355 with a custom AI cam in the 23x 23x neighbor hood with .6XX lift. With a 2800 stall it runs well enough that it is my daily driver, and I left my 17 year old daughter take it out when she asks.
Of course tuning by ED Wright helps tame a big cam in a smallish engine.

Oh, and I have more low end torque than my tires can cope with.
Mike
Old 06-26-2008, 07:11 PM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know about others, but I was referring to H/C in general. If you take a ported stock casting and put them on a LT1 with a stock cam you will lose low end torque. I guess that classifies as a "poor combo" as you said. I would hope that any matched H/C combo wouldn't fall into that category.

Alek is running a SR too, so that definitely doesn't hurt his cause.
Old 06-26-2008, 07:36 PM
  #37  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Yes it is a solid roller BUT it is also an engine that routinely sees 7500rpms yet makes lowend torque comparable or better than a lot of strokers, imagine if he had been looking to build a low rpm torquer.
Old 06-26-2008, 08:13 PM
  #38  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,042
Received 536 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jessica
Wrong.... THERE IS NO 23° head that can outflow the downstroke of the piston in a 350 cube motor. There are real cylinder heads that do... and that's why in those more airflow does not equal more power reguardless of what the internet gurus tell you.

I think you misunderstand pumping losses and engine physics.

Jes
I like me a feisty gurl!
I don't know what you mean about "some heads that do..." but that's neither here nor there. What I do know is that when you compare a 190 to 200cc head you WILL NOT experience torque loss of any kind.
Old 06-26-2008, 08:24 PM
  #39  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

1. this should be locked before it erupts into another flamewar

2. this has been argued/discussed countless times.

3. Both can do great work and have had proven results

4. Ideal choice depends on your setup/goals/budget/priorities

5. Neither one is "better", each has their supporters and detractors
Old 06-26-2008, 08:31 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
 
slingshot928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Look at Alek's results on Advanced Induction's "results" page. Tell me that 355 is lacking torque. From memory 385 at 3400rpms and peaks at 418 somewhere up around 5100, peak HP is up about 6800-7000 and at the track he revs it to 7500rpms. That is a big wide useable powerband, making more torque than a lot of strokers, making good torque low and still having a high rpm capable motor.

A lot of the "this is the way it will be" comments like the lack of torque and such are based on information gathered from the average poor combo.
I think the best way to show people is to post your setup with either a graph from the dyno, or a time slip, relying on other people's setups is not always the best..i am not trying to bash anyone here, and I think most people are looking for a good street/strip motor, and the stock computer goes to only what 7200? anyone, sorry if that is the wrong information. The only thing about the ai setup is the cnc heads, always will provide mostly the same results, but Lloyd seems to be a very good head porter as well.


Quick Reply: Lloyd Elliot or Advanced Inductions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.