Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters

t56 good and bad years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
jsmith564's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: covington ga
Default t56 good and bad years

i cant find any info for someone who is looking to see what years the t56 are good to use. i have read some years are weaker, some are better. and so fourth.

my goal hear is to swap my a4 out for a m6. it's a stock car. and i dont plant on any track time. just wanted to know what years are better then others.

thanks
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #2  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 36
From: T56th Street, Aridzona
Default

For a 2002 Camaro?
There's nothing about a 98 box that's critically different from a 2002 box.

That said, you may like the MN12 ratios of a GTO box and it's triple/double cone synchros (vs the double/single cone versions in the F-body MN6 boxes.

The GTO offset shifter lever needs changed so you can use an F-body shifter.
The GTO bellhousing needs the matching starter.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
TDP's Avatar
TDP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

They're all pretty much the same from 1994-2002. The LT1 T56's just had the shorter input shaft and different front bearing retainer. The innards are interchangeable. The 1993 T56's were slightly weaker, but not really enough to make a true difference.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
killagt's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 2
Default

I read some where, that 99+ t56 is weaker. and 96-98 is better.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #5  
TDP's Avatar
TDP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by killagt
I read some where, that 99+ t56 is weaker. and 96-98 is better.
Simply not true
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 07:13 PM
  #6  
thesource's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: Adkins - Tx
Default

The later model units had a better 2nd gear in them.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
cgslow77's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

so if your putting a 1995 t56 behind a ls1 you will need to switch input shafts? or can you use a extended pilot bearing ?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 11:15 PM
  #8  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 36
From: T56th Street, Aridzona
Post

Originally Posted by cgslow77
so if your putting a 1995 t56 behind a ls1 you will need to switch input shafts? or can you use a extended pilot bearing ?
Input and front adapter plate. Then set bearing preload.
That is too far to go w/ an extended pilot.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 12:47 AM
  #9  
MEAN LT1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville,FL
Default

93 T-56's had different gearing as well. I know the M28 version had the super low first gear and 6th gear wasnt as high as well. I forgot the characteristics about the other. However, first gear was diffeent on that one as well but not as drastic. Both were only rated at 350hp capabilities.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 11:05 AM
  #10  
cgslow77's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

how do you set the preload ?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 01:21 PM
  #11  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 36
From: T56th Street, Aridzona
Default

The rebuild manual on TTC's site used to detail how to do it.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #12  
TDP's Avatar
TDP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by cgslow77
how do you set the preload ?
It's actually end play, not pre-load. If you pre-loaded the bearing, you'd have a noisy transmission. It should have zero up to a few thousandths of end play.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 02:17 PM
  #13  
cgslow77's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

ok got it.. whats ttc?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #14  
Mike454SS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 9
From: South Windsor, CT
Default

Originally Posted by cgslow77
ok got it.. whats ttc?
Transmission Technologies Corporation...Tremec is kinda their brand name for their "light duty" applications. http://www.ttcautomotive.com/English/home/home.asp...I know thats not a "sponsor" link...but it's kinda like posting a link to gm.com and saying "Chevrolet is their brand name for the Camaro and Corvette"...hope I don't get in trouble.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #15  
NHRATA01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 36
From: Dutchess, New York
Default

Originally Posted by killagt
I read some where, that 99+ t56 is weaker. and 96-98 is better.
They switched manufacturers from Borg-Warner to Tremec. Well, switched might be the wrong term, but essentially Tremec bought the transmission division from Borg-Warner I believe in '98. However they did not change the design, nor to my knowledge even the manufacturing location.

They did switch the material of the blocker ring material from paper to carbon around 98ish, and there was always some scuttle that synthetic would destroy the paper rings for those early year transmissions.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 08:27 AM
  #16  
calhoon's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte metro area
Default

The manufacture of the T56 moved from Muncie, IN ,to Tremec, central Mexico in '98.
The early T56, the M28 &M29, gearsets were not created equal to the later M6 & M12s.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 05:04 PM
  #17  
Bone240sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default thanks

Originally Posted by jmd
For a 2002 Camaro?
There's nothing about a 98 box that's critically different from a 2002 box.

That said, you may like the MN12 ratios of a GTO box and it's triple/double cone synchros (vs the double/single cone versions in the F-body MN6 boxes.

The GTO offset shifter lever needs changed so you can use an F-body shifter.
The GTO bellhousing needs the matching starter.

This was very helpful...thanks
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 02:13 PM
  #18  
yukonrott's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default t56 swap..

OK fellas first off I'm not an engine intelligent person I guess...I can strip a car and paint it but engines aren't my thing. I recently swapped a 2000 5.3 into my 86 cutlass. It runs great but the trans needs to go. So if I went t56 what would I need...I'm leaning towards that guy up top here for a rebuilt one but as far as bell housing and stuff I don't know where to start Any help would be great thanks
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2014 | 06:23 PM
  #19  
gnx7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 273
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

You need an LS1 style T56 bellhousing/input shaft/front bearing plate to work on your 2000 5.3.

The '94-02 Fbody style T56's are essentially all the same internally. An LT1 trans won't bolt up to an LS1 style motor... but can be converted into an LS1 style with that style input shaft and front bearing plate/BH.

The '93 LT1 T56 has different gearing and you can't convert it over like the '94-97 LT1 T56's to LS1 style. The '93 tooth count is wrong.

GTO T56 (04-06) has a really short 1st gear.... they are geared to move a big heavy car. I like the Fbody gearing better. You could also buy a new T56 Magnum (TR6060 style internalls) which shifts light years better than any pre 2008 T56. I love mine!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2014 | 03:19 PM
  #20  
Youngblood16's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

93 t-56 was for the LT1 motor, it was weaker and had different gearing/tooth count- has small block chevy style bellhousing aka NOT LSx
94-97 tranmissions were also for the LT1 motor aka the basic small block chevy, aka NOT LSx
the front cover, input shaft, and bellhousing are not compatable with an LS motor.

98-02 t56's are basically all the same, except the 2000-2002 had the "viper second gear" which had longer engagement teeth which= stronger gear, but I wouldn't worry too much.

The 98-02 t56 fits LS motors, ie LS1, LS2, LS3, LS6, LS7, and their iron block family members, which are the truck motors- 4.8, 5.3, 6.0. Although the t56 never came stock with the truck motors, they bolt right up.

yukonrott- you will need all of the following from a 98-02 Camaro Z28/SS-- bellhousing, clutch/flywheel assembly, throwout & pilot bearings, shifter and hydraulic clutch line.

you will also need a hydraulic clutch master cylinder/manual pedal assembly, hopefully someone can chime in on what year pedals/ master would be the easiest for your Cutlass... btw I almost bought an 87 Cutty(for an LS swap) nice cars.

Last edited by Youngblood16; Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19 PM. Reason: adding info
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.