LS7 Clutch Pros N' Cons
06-15-2012, 07:26 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS7 Clutch Pros N' Cons I bought a GTO T56 for my swap and in need of a new clutch. Was thinking of the Z06 LS7 clutch because I've heard allot of good things about it. like best bang for the buck clutch..etc but I also heard the fly is real heavy. I was also thinking of a center force clutch. What do you guys think?
06-17-2012, 09:22 AM
#2
i love my LS7 clutch. it is a smooth engagement,and great pedal feel. it is one of the best clutch's i have ever had (besides my jeep clutch) i have about 10k on my clutch and it is still going strong. have at least 50 passes on it with launches from 1500-3500 rpm.
yes the flywheel is a little heavier then an LS1 but i have not seen any drop in MPG, and definitely not in power.
yes the flywheel is a little heavier then an LS1 but i have not seen any drop in MPG, and definitely not in power.
06-19-2012, 11:43 AM
#5
The LS7 is an overrated clutch, if you drive it aggressively/take it to the track it will fail/slip. If you're on a budget and are trying to "get by" then this is the clutch for you. If you want something that will hold, is proven, is a complete kit that is balanced, and comes with a warranty, take a look at our Monster Clutches.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
06-19-2012, 11:47 AM
#6
I'll agree with SNL! We've driven and installed a fair share of LS7 clutches, but I will tell you they just don't handle the power that guys want to push on them. Anything beyond about 450rwhp NA I would NEVER recommend that clutch for. On spray, I'd say less than that because they just can't handle the torque.
__________________
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
06-19-2012, 12:24 PM
#7
I'll agree with SNL! We've driven and installed a fair share of LS7 clutches, but I will tell you they just don't handle the power that guys want to push on them. Anything beyond about 450rwhp NA I would NEVER recommend that clutch for. On spray, I'd say less than that because they just can't handle the torque.
in all the stated values as well.. Remember that the vette
LS7 is close to 3100lbs and heavier vehicles will need lower
HP/TQ ratings to reliably use the LS7 clutch.
Since I'm building a 450rwhp NA L99 motor in a 2900lb C4 vette, I chose the LS7 clutch. YMMV
Trending Topics
06-19-2012, 02:13 PM
#8
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LS7 is an overrated clutch, if you drive it aggressively/take it to the track it will fail/slip. If you're on a budget and are trying to "get by" then this is the clutch for you. If you want something that will hold, is proven, is a complete kit that is balanced, and comes with a warranty, take a look at our Monster Clutches.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
I'll agree with SNL! We've driven and installed a fair share of LS7 clutches, but I will tell you they just don't handle the power that guys want to push on them. Anything beyond about 450rwhp NA I would NEVER recommend that clutch for. On spray, I'd say less than that because they just can't handle the torque.
06-19-2012, 04:05 PM
#9
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive got about 10-15k on mine over 4 years. It is on its last legs right now. Its maybe seen the 10 track passes. I do however beat on it quite a bit on the street. I think a spring let go, my clutch pedal also stays on the floor if i get on it in a low gear
06-20-2012, 11:28 AM
#13
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW, I would seriously think about getting another clutch. The LS7s are ok, but they have a few major downsides, which have already been mentioned.
06-20-2012, 11:56 AM
#14
??? You just reset the self-adjusters back and it will "self-adjust" to the new hydraulics. Hence the name and concept.
Not a pro, nor a con.
Not a pro, nor a con.
Something to be aware of is if you put in an LS7 and ever want to switch your stock MC to an aftermarket like Tick, you will be changing clutches as well. The self adjusting pressure plate on the LS7 doesn't like hydraulics changes. There are several guys on here, myself included, that have a LS7 broken in on a stock master and have changed to a Tick and encountered problems. Just something to think about now.
06-20-2012, 09:59 PM
#16
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never knew you could reliably reset the self adjusters. That's a new one on me. I've heard of people trying, but it not being a guaranteed to work process. If you have done it before or know of people having success doing it, please let me know.
06-21-2012, 01:02 AM
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LS7 is an overrated clutch, if you drive it aggressively/take it to the track it will fail/slip. If you're on a budget and are trying to "get by" then this is the clutch for you. If you want something that will hold, is proven, is a complete kit that is balanced, and comes with a warranty, take a look at our Monster Clutches.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
Oh, and we've got them on sale.
I'll agree with SNL! We've driven and installed a fair share of LS7 clutches, but I will tell you they just don't handle the power that guys want to push on them. Anything beyond about 450rwhp NA I would NEVER recommend that clutch for. On spray, I'd say less than that because they just can't handle the torque.
Well I guess I know what clutch I'm not getting next week.
Research bud! or ask like I did. I always do before I pull the trigger on parts lol.
06-21-2012, 03:31 AM
#18
Wich one do you recommend? I got a GTO T56 going into my 01' LS1. NA about 425RWHP for about a year then turbo.
Well I guess I know what clutch I'm not getting next week.
that should be a no brainer at your power level and expected level ...doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
Research bud! or ask like I did. I always do before I pull the trigger on parts lol.
Well I guess I know what clutch I'm not getting next week.
that should be a no brainer at your power level and expected level ...doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
Research bud! or ask like I did. I always do before I pull the trigger on parts lol.
There always gonna be pros and cons to every part, Cant please everyone. come on!!!
Last edited by stroked383HSR; 06-21-2012 at 03:39 AM.
06-22-2012, 09:35 AM
#20
Ls7 use to be the big thing before we had a lot of options for clutches. It was cheap and slightly better than stock, however comparing them with luk factory replacements it was hard to tell a difference between the two units
Go with the ls7 with your head/cam car and it should be enough to hold for your needs, just don't expect them to take hard drops from a stop and last as long as other clutches made of heavier compounds
Go with the ls7 with your head/cam car and it should be enough to hold for your needs, just don't expect them to take hard drops from a stop and last as long as other clutches made of heavier compounds