http://www.insideline.com/features/b...lenger-rt.html

LOL!!! With the Biggest Tires!!

 

not to mention that it burned out longer in 2nd gear that the mustang did all together.

 

That has got to be one of the best New Car tests I've ever seen!! A++ for originality!

 

ROFL at the mustangs "mighty" 309 ft-lbs of torque.

 

Yeah.. the Camaro may be slower than the Mustang, but it can do neater burnouts!1

 

hey now, thats a low blow

oh well, badass test. i say add it to all edmunds tests. glad the bowtie can bring home the W

 

I'm pretty sure they are rated at 390, must have been a typo.

I thought the comparison was kind of dumb, anybody can do a clutch dump in a manual car.

 

And, it all boils down to the different tires they all had, suspension, etc.

 

Ah ok. Thanks

 

useless test. I would rather have the car that had the shortest burnout length from a 6,000rpm clutch dump...burnouts for show, traction for go!!!

Seemed like he short shifted the Camaro and bounced of the rev limiter in the mustang and challenger...

 

exactly the reason the Camaro loses to the 5.0 in a drag race, no traction and bad accelleration outta the hole

 

That, and it has a lower power to weight ratio.

 

that and better gearing

 

dumbasses should have started in 2nd gear.

 

LMFAO about his mullet comment!!!

 

He had the Grave Digger hat, he didnt need a mullet.

 

He should push the seat up a little further, I don't think he was close enough to the steering wheel.

 

Wow this guy sucks at burnouts. I smoke them all by about 1000' haha

Sorry but this is how you do a burnout
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYIqTCqFy7U

 

Cool test. But pretty dissappointing results. Get Ken Block to do the test or Tanner foust. See if you get the same results...

 

Just goes to show you spinning aint winning