Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Caroll Shelby ripping some gears in the new GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2006, 09:22 PM
  #81  
Teching In
 
69mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auburn/Phenix City Alabama
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00transamnh
5) who cares if the mustang has back seats, its the only thing ford has in that price range to compete with the vette
the 03/04 cobras can compete with C6's for a lot less.
Old 07-25-2006, 09:25 PM
  #82  
12 Second Club
 
67maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The car wasnt even broke in yet thats impressive. You make fun of the mustang while it still has better interior then your car thats just plain stupid? Big numbers equate to low 1/4 times. It would be far more comparable to compare the GTO to the GT500 both have back seats weigh about the same. Well the fighter jet costs as much as the Lambo Murci and out performs it in every aspect even though they are not even close to being in the sam league neither is the Corvette and the GT500. The GT500 walks the vette in 1/4 and trap speed proven by FF so who the **** cares. I didnt ask what your trans am was purchased for either.

Originally Posted by 00transamnh
well the difference is

1) my TRANS AM cost me <17k
2) my trans am was made 6 years ago
3) NEW my trans am cost 20k less than the gt 500 new
4) why the hell would i be jelouse? if i wanted a ******* mustang id be on a mustang board
5) who cares if the mustang has back seats, its the only thing ford has in that price range to compete with the vette
6)the jet fighter thing was stupid
7) as to the gt 500 dynoing almost as much as the z06... who the hell cares the z06 runs a full second faster than the gt... how many people buy a car for it to be a dyno queen
8) next set of retarded comments please
Old 07-25-2006, 10:02 PM
  #83  
TECH Apprentice
 
EDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sulphur, la
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

bottom line is would anybody in there right mind, pay that kind of money for a car that looks like that
Old 07-25-2006, 10:14 PM
  #84  
Teching In
 
69mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auburn/Phenix City Alabama
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EDawg
bottom line is would anybody in there right mind, pay that kind of money for a car that looks like that

If I had the money I sure would. 40 grand for a 500hp piece of history designed by Mr. Shelby himself
Old 07-25-2006, 11:47 PM
  #85  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
one2run's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crestview, FL
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cool in it's own right. i just don't like the new mustangs body style. i am a fan of the 03-04 cobra. hot frick'n car ford had designed right there.
i can't wait to see one of those GT500's on the road! i will try 'n run 'em!
Old 07-25-2006, 11:54 PM
  #86  
Teching In
 
69mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auburn/Phenix City Alabama
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree the 03/0 cobras are the best looking mustangs besides the 69-70 mach 1's in my opinion.
Old 07-26-2006, 02:23 AM
  #87  
TECH Addict
 
SLP LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome vid!!!!
Old 07-26-2006, 11:43 AM
  #88  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
00transamnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Farmington NH
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69mach
the 03/04 cobras can compete with C6's for a lot less.
i absolutely agree... this is why i think this new cobra sucks so bad

it should atleast be better than the old 03/04s (nice car)... it just isnt, bottom line, quarter mile may be better but it isnt a better car

Last edited by 00transamnh; 07-26-2006 at 04:02 PM.
Old 07-26-2006, 11:47 AM
  #89  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
00transamnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Farmington NH
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 67maro
The car wasnt even broke in yet thats impressive. You make fun of the mustang while it still has better interior then your car thats just plain stupid? Big numbers equate to low 1/4 times. It would be far more comparable to compare the GTO to the GT500 both have back seats weigh about the same. Well the fighter jet costs as much as the Lambo Murci and out performs it in every aspect even though they are not even close to being in the sam league neither is the Corvette and the GT500. The GT500 walks the vette in 1/4 and trap speed proven by FF so who the **** cares. I didnt ask what your trans am was purchased for either.
Yes i make fun of the mustang... it should have a better interior than my damn t/a... after all the ******* thing costs 20k more and has 6 years on me

and you cant compare the gto and the gt500 they are completely different pricetags

and where the hell are you getting this fighter jet analogy? cuz it sucks! I hate to break it to ya but a fighter jet doesnt cost 300k jackass

i was pointing out what my t/a costs because thats the level of car i could purchase at 17k... it should be nowhere near that of the gt500
Old 07-26-2006, 06:07 PM
  #90  
Teching In
 
69mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auburn/Phenix City Alabama
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00transamnh
i was pointing out what my t/a costs because thats the level of car i could purchase at 17k... it should be nowhere near that of the gt500
Same can be said for the C6 if your gonna say that.
Old 07-26-2006, 06:32 PM
  #91  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
john3daly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a great concept..I guess. Blower/small block...who could guess it would make power? It's in a SUPER bad package and it's WAY overpriced. I don't care who designed it. Just cause some old mans name is on it doesn't mean it's great....

Take the same design and put it in a much smaller/lighter vehicle and knock $15k off the price, then you have a winner. Of course, it keeps getting harder and harder to fit a motor the size of a big block in a little car....maybe Ford should go back to ONE cam and pushrods...? But then I don't guess they could make any power? God knows large cubes pushrod motors don't respond to FI..
Old 07-26-2006, 09:07 PM
  #92  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
00transamnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Farmington NH
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69mach
Same can be said for the C6 if your gonna say that.
well he didnt compare the c6 to my car he compared the 500 to it
Old 07-26-2006, 10:03 PM
  #93  
12 Second Club
 
67maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00transamnh
Yes i make fun of the mustang... it should have a better interior than my damn t/a... after all the ******* thing costs 20k more and has 6 years on me

and you cant compare the gto and the gt500 they are completely different pricetags

and where the hell are you getting this fighter jet analogy? cuz it sucks! I hate to break it to ya but a fighter jet doesnt cost 300k jackass

i was pointing out what my t/a costs because thats the level of car i could purchase at 17k... it should be nowhere near that of the gt500
A mig 21 Figther jet can be had for less then 300k which can travel at a speed of mach1 or like 670mph. Anyways I see you like the 03/04 Cobra better as I do too its a great car and Id rather have one then that pig of a car the GT500.
Old 07-26-2006, 11:27 PM
  #94  
Teching In
 
69mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auburn/Phenix City Alabama
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00transamnh
well he didnt compare the c6 to my car he compared the 500 to it
I know, but I am, just trying to make a point, no disrespect or anything. I believe the C6 and GT500 are very good to compare money and performance wise. You're saying that your 17 grand car shouldnt come close in comparing to a 40 grand car (GT500 or the C6) and I totally agree.
Old 07-27-2006, 12:09 PM
  #95  
TECH Apprentice
 
VENGEANCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A. A GT500 will not go a low 12 on stock tires. Wont happen. 412rwhp and 3900lbs? Uh uh.

B. I wouldnt exactly call that "ripping gears". I wanted to see him powershift that bitch.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.