*STOCK* LS1 Dyno Numbers POST! (Do A Search)
02-21-2010, 06:50 PM
#23
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-21-2010, 08:14 PM
#25
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Emporia, Ks
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes stock motor pal. Had it apart, stock heads, pistons ls1 intake, cam and tranny and big ugly stock conveter ! everything. Point is that Yes those are higher numbers but not saying that stock stuff can't run. My cars only suspensions mods are lower control arms, homemade subframe connectors and 3.73 gear and d/s loop. And went 12.78 motor and 11.66 with nitrous.
02-21-2010, 09:03 PM
#26
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW area
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a 02 SS Camaro non SLP option car its a 6 speed with 120,000 miles on the stock motor
its has a K&N Air filter Whisper lid and MSD coil packs (only because stock ones failed which i know don't give any power)
just finished getting it tuned last night and it put down 363 Hp and 365 TQ
will have a print out asap to prove this but i was curious what other stock
LS1's are putting down and if yall think that mine is a factory freak or something
its has a K&N Air filter Whisper lid and MSD coil packs (only because stock ones failed which i know don't give any power)
just finished getting it tuned last night and it put down 363 Hp and 365 TQ
will have a print out asap to prove this but i was curious what other stock
LS1's are putting down and if yall think that mine is a factory freak or something
02-21-2010, 10:23 PM
#27
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 5.0
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes stock motor pal. Had it apart, stock heads, pistons ls1 intake, cam and tranny and big ugly stock conveter ! everything. Point is that Yes those are higher numbers but not saying that stock stuff can't run. My cars only suspensions mods are lower control arms, homemade subframe connectors and 3.73 gear and d/s loop. And went 12.78 motor and 11.66 with nitrous.
02-21-2010, 10:39 PM
#28
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,254
Likes: 0
Received 1,687 Likes
on
1,208 Posts
All we're saying is, 363rwhp is impossibile with a stock LS1. Period. That has nothing to do with what sort of times they can run with mods that don't add HP (like gears, stalls, tires, suspension, and weight reduction).
02-21-2010, 11:48 PM
#30
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Emporia, Ks
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The point i was making is, as someone else posted is taking it to the track to see what it actually does, sense the dyno numbers are not correct. Do you see the point i am getting at? I wasn't saying that gears, etc make hp. What i said was a little off topic from the point, but i was just imputting that you can see what it acheives at the track with the minimum parts. Sorry for the confusion.
02-22-2010, 06:58 AM
#32
Even with the point you are trying to make, you left out the most important number, the NA mph. 12.7 is nice, but it's possible to run 12.7 at about 103-104mph, which would indicate less power than an average stock LS1.
02-22-2010, 07:16 AM
#33
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you mean 243's. and yes, Op check your head castings (check the passenger side towards the front) and let us know what the three digits are that are listed on the heads. if its anything besides 241 then you don't have stock heads.
02-22-2010, 10:38 AM
#35
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You sure thats not the HP at the crank!? No way its making that with only those mods. Take it to the track see what you trap. Take it to a nice shop as you have mentioned and find out whats done to it if it is indeed 363hp to the wheels. Nice numbers though
02-22-2010, 12:01 PM
#37
Good mph, but not making 363 to the ground. I realize that you aren't making that claim about your car, but the point of telling him to hit up the track is that the trap speed will be a good indicator of actual HP.
02-22-2010, 02:23 PM
#38
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,254
Likes: 0
Received 1,687 Likes
on
1,208 Posts
Unless someone stripped a bunch of weight out of the car at some point. This will also raise trap speed without add HP.
If the car traps too high for the mods, I'd still get the car weighed before beleiving the mustang-dyno'ed 363rwhp number. It's just impossibile to beleive that number, and getting the trap speed and vehicle weight are MUCH easier and cheaper than breaking into the motor. Unless of course, you can plainly see a casting number on the head other than 241. Also, double check rpms to mph to verify gearing, that too can inflate trap speed.
02-22-2010, 02:33 PM
#39
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Emporia, Ks
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya my car weighted around 3520 with me in it at the time when i went 108 mph. I am not sure about hp to the wheels in relation with mph are you guys ? ? I know you have to have around 500 to go around 115 116 mph. But i don't know the calucation.