Add HP first or drivetrain?
#1
Add HP first or drivetrain?
I've got 10k on my Z and think its time to add some more performance. I can't do both at the same time because of cash flow. Should I build the motor first or get a rear. I know it makes sense to do the drivetrain first, but I really want more power and sound. Then again I would love to have 4.10's.
My engine plans are moderate cam, LT's, pulley and tune. My drivetrain build up will be a rear, ds, TQ arm and new clutch when needed.
Thanks.
My engine plans are moderate cam, LT's, pulley and tune. My drivetrain build up will be a rear, ds, TQ arm and new clutch when needed.
Thanks.
#2
10 Second Club
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by M6HTZ
I've got 10k on my Z and think its time to add some more performance. I can't do both at the same time because of cash flow. Should I build the motor first or get a rear. I know it makes sense to do the drivetrain first, but I really want more power and sound. Then again I would love to have 4.10's.
My engine plans are moderate cam, LT's, pulley and tune. My drivetrain build up will be a rear, ds, TQ arm and new clutch when needed.
Thanks.
My engine plans are moderate cam, LT's, pulley and tune. My drivetrain build up will be a rear, ds, TQ arm and new clutch when needed.
Thanks.
Get a 12bolt with 4.30s, that will be plenty of fun.
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I subscribe to the "do it right the first time" theory, so IMO drivetrain comes first - especially true when its your DD like jrp mentioned. An old timer once told me that you build a hot rod powertrain from back to front and I tend to think that's good advice. If nothing else you will minimize the time spent on the flatbed
#11
TECH Fanatic
i say if its not broke dont fix it....try to get your moneys worth out of your 10'' first. get some long tubes, maybe a cam, first and have fun with the power for a while. id say throw some 4:10 gears in there, and a nice TA cover, and id bet it would last a long time.....unless your running slicks and launching at 5K....
you will love a set of 4:10 gears...there awsome!
you will love a set of 4:10 gears...there awsome!
#12
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by M6HuggerSS
i say if its not broke dont fix it....try to get your moneys worth out of your 10'' first.
#13
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I'm at the minus 9K in the spending department compared to you, but my long range plan is a bit more horsepower. I've decided I do not want jerry rigged torque multiplication or numerically higher gears, I want all of the attibutes of stock plus faster acceleration at any speed. Expensive but well engineered heads and a mild duration, and lobe separation angle cam, with high lift seems what I am looking for, from a novice point of view, as I am not a wrencher and don't know a lot, but trying to learn . My goal 370 RWHP with no emission passing problems and all the driving charactistics of stock. Really would like to have a 110+ trap speeds, that would make me happy.
Regards,
Regards,
#14
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by ArcticFormula
Well I'm at the minus 9K in the spending department compared to you, but my long range plan is a bit more horsepower. I've decided I do not want jerry rigged torque multiplication or numerically higher gears, I want all of the attibutes of stock plus faster acceleration at any speed. Expensive but well engineered heads and a mild duration, and lobe separation angle cam, with high lift seems what I am looking for, from a novice point of view, as I am not a wrencher and don't know a lot, but trying to learn . My goal 370 RWHP with no emission passing problems and all the driving charactistics of stock. Really would like to have a 110+ trap speeds, that would make me happy.
Regards,
Regards,
#18
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ArcticFormula
Well I'm at the minus 9K in the spending department compared to you, but my long range plan is a bit more horsepower. I've decided I do not want jerry rigged torque multiplication or numerically higher gears, I want all of the attibutes of stock plus faster acceleration at any speed. Expensive but well engineered heads and a mild duration, and lobe separation angle cam, with high lift seems what I am looking for, from a novice point of view, as I am not a wrencher and don't know a lot, but trying to learn . My goal 370 RWHP with no emission passing problems and all the driving charactistics of stock. Really would like to have a 110+ trap speeds, that would make me happy.
Regards,
Regards,