New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast intake or ls6 intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2012, 10:51 AM
  #41  
Formally Simplɘ Jack
 
BoricuaHec01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If your a baller, Fast. Tight on cash, LS6.
BoricuaHec01 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:00 AM
  #42  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws6man29
Reply to your reply.
I have seen dyno test with a 450 rwhp ls1 with heads,cam and ls6 intake make the 450 rwhp I stated earlier.The guy put on a fast 102 intake and only seen a difference of 3 rwhp gain with the fast set up.So im simply saying that if you have 450rwhp or below a ls6 intake will do you good.If you are looking for more horsepower go with the fast .
One anomaly does not represent the norm though. I can think of a guy off hand who went from the ls6 to a fast and picked up 35rwhp. Doesn't mean that is the norm either. But 15-20rwhp on a head/cam car is much more ordinary.

There are variables: head flow, cam profile, rpm range, tune, same dyno?, same SAE correction?, same conditions?, is there a restriction in front of the throttle body?

Can a car make up to 450hp with the ls6? Sure, it could make 450rwhp with the ls1 intake if you really tried. But I don't think anyone would argue the ls6 isn't worth installing.
thunderstruck507 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:10 AM
  #43  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Simplɘ Jack
If your a baller, Fast. Tight on cash, LS6.
My Fast 90mm with stock injectors/rail was $450 plus shipping. Used tb was ~$150 shipped.

Just have to look around sometimes. Sold my stock ls1 intake and stock ported tb and the extra rail/injectors. Ls6= $300, so for ~$150-175 more I got a used fast 90/90. Would I pay full price for what I do with the car? Hell no. But that's why we have a classified section.
thunderstruck507 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:18 AM
  #44  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Badmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
One anomaly does not represent the norm though. I can think of a guy off hand who went from the ls6 to a fast and picked up 35rwhp. Doesn't mean that is the norm either. But 15-20rwhp on a head/cam car is much more ordinary.

There are variables: head flow, cam profile, rpm range, tune, same dyno?, same SAE correction?, same conditions?, is there a restriction in front of the throttle body?

Can a car make up to 450hp with the ls6? Sure, it could make 450rwhp with the ls1 intake if you really tried. But I don't think anyone would argue the ls6 isn't worth installing.
Agreed.

TB - Intake Manifold - Heads

If all 3 don't flow the same, one is being a bottleneck to the airflow. Sure, you'll likely see gains if you change one of the three, but it's all relative to the other two as to how much you gain. Just depends if you feel the $$ is worth the gains.
Badmeat is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 12:03 PM
  #45  
Formally Simplɘ Jack
 
BoricuaHec01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
My Fast 90mm with stock injectors/rail was $450 plus shipping. Used tb was ~$150 shipped.

Just have to look around sometimes. Sold my stock ls1 intake and stock ported tb and the extra rail/injectors. Ls6= $300, so for ~$150-175 more I got a used fast 90/90. Would I pay full price for what I do with the car? Hell no. But that's why we have a classified section.
Ya I def need all my parts brand new, but if I do see a FAST in good condition under classifieds or craigslist, I'll def take a look but extremely hard to find in my area.
BoricuaHec01 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 12:58 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02CamZ28
Thanks everyone! Once I get the funds I think I'm going to go with a fast 102/102 setup! Appreciate it guys!
I would be looking for a used Fast 90/90 setup. I think in your case that a Fast 102/102 setup would be overkill. You only have ported heads and a medium sized cam. I picked up over 27rwhp going from a LS6 to a Fast 90/90.
NC98Z is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:05 AM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No way, you are leaving a solid 10 on the table with your 90/90 on that combo
Blk98Vert is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 04:12 AM
  #48  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
504ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just switched from a ls6 to a ported fast 92/92. If I cam remember to come back here next Tuesday after I get tuned I will let you know what I pick up. Im also a h/c car
504ls1 is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 06:07 AM
  #49  
Teching In
 
ls11998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: kansas
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a fast 92mm with a ls2 tb made big differences over ls6 intake and tb
ls11998 is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:38 AM
  #50  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws6man29
BLK98VRT""""""""""""
You are not listening to what is being said.So we will try again.A ls6 intake on a 450 rwhp car is sufficent enough to not lose any hp.If we put a fast on inplace of the ls6 we would gain 3hp.Is it worth $1000 for 3 hp?Based on the fact the car owner does not want to go over 450rwhp.It does not warrant the bigger intake unless you are an idiot and would pay $1000 for 3 horsepower.Maybe the car owner who has 450rwhp is content and this quote will make him realize that $1000 can be spent on something else that he could get his money worth maybe suspension etc.
He is listening, you are just wrong.

An ls6 won't "lose" Rwhp on a 450Rwhp but it is NOT anywhere close to making the most Rwhp on that type of setup, you are leaving a MINIMUM of 10Rwhp on the table at that point.

You show me ONE dyno where the guy only picked up 3Rwhp and I will show you 20 dynos where people made double digit gains.
At 450Rwhp on a H/C Ls1 you are damn straight I will pay 1,000$ for 10Rwhp, WELL worth it. At that point, there isn't much left you can do to make a gain like that.

Originally Posted by ws6man29
Reply to your reply.
I have seen dyno test with a 450 rwhp ls1 with heads,cam and ls6 intake make the 450 rwhp I stated earlier.The guy put on a fast 102 intake and only seen a difference of 3 rwhp gain with the fast set up.So im simply saying that if you have 450rwhp or below a ls6 intake will do you good.If you are looking for more horsepower go with the fast .
A FAST 102 on a bone stock car would make that gain.

I installed a ported 102 intake that was absolutely butchered by the ported, as in it probably hurt the flow. Before the tune I gained 14Rwhp, this was on a hand ported 317 heads and a baby cam setup making 377Rwhp before the swap with an ls6 intake (cam was specd for the ls6 intake). If I had a larger cam or heads that flow better (or hell a decently ported intake) the gains BEFORE the tune would have been extremely close to 20Rwhp. The torque gain was extremely nice also.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:48 AM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks lemons. And ws6 man why don't you call up BBK and ask them how much their manifold made over an LS6. I know for a fact the 102 will gain under 450 rwhp because again go look at when GM hogh tech tested it on a motor making 450 at the crank which was an LS with headers and a mild 224/230 cam. They gained double digits in both hp and tq over the LS6. So where is your argument now?
Blk98Vert is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:07 AM
  #52  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Like I said in previous posts, I suspect the guy who only gained "3rwhp" if it was even the same dyno same day had some other restriction in front of the intake or in the exhaust.
thunderstruck507 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:31 PM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
My6speedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I see no point in running the 102/102 combo unless you have a FTP lid and/or a 100mm MAF or going SD tune. I know the stock MAF has seen people running 550 to the wheel, but I was concerned with eliminating any choke points or restrictions and shooting for the straightest path into my throttle body as possible.
My6speedZ is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 08:55 PM
  #54  
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
watman02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

How much you want for your ls6 intake?
watman02 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 10:53 PM
  #55  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blk98Vert
Thanks lemons. And ws6 man why don't you call up BBK and ask them how much their manifold made over an LS6
Because they would admit an ls6 makes more power than their bbk?



OP- Spend your money on something else.
MikeWS6 is offline  
Old 01-27-2012, 01:39 AM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
Because they would admit an ls6 makes more power than their bbk?

OP- Spend your money on something else.
Even independent tests have proven the BBK setup makes more than ls6 setup.

Wanna solve intake issues? Buy a blower, FORCE that air in there!!!
lemons12 is offline  
Old 01-27-2012, 01:55 AM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yep, everything else just beats the LS6 on the top end
Blk98Vert is offline  
Old 01-27-2012, 09:20 AM
  #58  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6man29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fl
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by lemons12
Even independent tests have proven the BBK setup makes more than ls6 setup.

Wanna solve intake issues? Buy a blower, FORCE that air in there!!!
THEN SHOW ME THESE TESTS!!!!!!!!!!!!! if they even exist and If its a reliable source then I will say you are right but do not just throw out there BBk is better than Ls6 because it is offered as a aftermarket bolt on that claims 17 rwhp over a ls6 setup Lets face it we all know these performance part stores all beef up their rwhp claim to get us to buy the parts.Its a marketing thing.Really buy my MAF and you will gain 20 rwhp come on get real they just want our money and their is people out there stupid enough to buy the false horsepower claims."""""""""I sell these parts on a daily basis""""""""" and I can tell you all the manufactures exaderate their claims here is Bbks claim

•Provides 18-24 Horsepower Increase On Stock LS1, 12-15 Horsepower Increase On Z06

They also do not tell you the intake weighs 34 lbs compared to the 8lb ls6.They do not tell you that you can fry a egg on their intake a 1/2 hr after you shut the car off either.

Last edited by ws6man29; 01-27-2012 at 09:49 AM.
ws6man29 is offline  
Old 01-27-2012, 10:10 AM
  #59  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...vs-fast92.html

Also see post #27 here:
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=347366

Here's a mag test:
Name:  BBK8.jpg
Views: 903
Size:  80.9 KB


Other easy to find info on here:

Originally Posted by Pwebbz28
The BBK is a great intake after a little work. Its a middle of the road intake between the LS6 and FAST. Heat soak is for people who have no real world results. At the track my MPH stayed the same when hot or cold and on the dyno the numbers never changed. Biggest issue is making sure the intake is sealed to the heads. If you heads have been milled the intake will need some clearancing cause it will hit the small, top head bolts. You will also need some button head valley cover bolts. Have the intake cleaned up and port matched and you will be pleased.


IMO the BBK vs ls6 isn't enough difference to fight over. I prefer the black plastic look anyway.

Last edited by thunderstruck507; 01-27-2012 at 10:21 AM.
thunderstruck507 is offline  
Old 01-27-2012, 10:28 AM
  #60  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6man29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fl
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ws6man29
THEN SHOW ME THESE TESTS!!!!!!!!!!!!! if they even exist and If its a reliable source then I will say you are right but do not just throw out there BBk is better than Ls6 because it is offered as a aftermarket bolt on that claims 17 rwhp over a ls6 setup Lets face it we all know these performance part stores all beef up their rwhp claim to get us to buy the parts.Its a marketing thing.Really buy my MAF and you will gain 20 rwhp come on get real they just want our money and their is people out there stupid enough to buy the false horsepower claims."""""""""I sell these parts on a daily basis""""""""" and I can tell you all the manufactures exaderate their claims here is Bbks claim

•Provides 18-24 Horsepower Increase On Stock LS1, 12-15 Horsepower Increase On Z06

They also do not tell you the intake weighs 34 lbs compared to the 8lb ls6.They do not tell you that you can fry a egg on their intake a 1/2 hr after you shut the car off either.

Thunder,I agree with you that they are almost identical and would prefer the black one also.Here is a quote from the link you posted.Also from that link the tester said the BBk had only 5 rwhp more than the ls6 so I guess if you get a good deal on the ls6 get it!Plus the advantages of not having a metal intake for heatsoak and weight is also a factor.So my opinion is ls6 over BBk SSi

"""""I'm mixed on this. If I had a stock TB and a LS1 intake, I would buy a BBK for sure. Unless I found a LS6 intake cheap, like $250 that dosnt happen much. Most are $330-350. A BBK 85mm intake is only $399 at NewEra were I got mine. So thats a good deal if you have a LS1 intake still, its 5whp more then a LS6"""""""""""

Last edited by ws6man29; 01-27-2012 at 11:22 AM.
ws6man29 is offline  


Quick Reply: Fast intake or ls6 intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.