Which is faster? SS or WS6?
08-26-2004, 08:48 AM
#61
Originally Posted by MetallicBluews6
It is just mind boggling that in some way or another it has been tested by myself on the street track and magazines to have a higher horsepower ratings and faster 0 to 60 and quarte mile time.
08-26-2004, 11:29 PM
#62
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which is faster? SS or WS6.
Originally Posted by INMY01TA
Why don't you tell us what kind of 1/4 mile times you ran bone stock and we'll tell you if you're fast or not.
And its a Automatic!
08-27-2004, 07:54 AM
#63
Originally Posted by Nocturnal SS
I know you are not talking to me; but i felt like standing up for the SS. My 2002 Camaro SS went 12.96 totally stock. In 53 degrees weather
And its a Automatic!
And its a Automatic!
08-27-2004, 08:15 AM
#65
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SS also means a little more weight I do believe as well. My definition of STOCK is, I go buy a car, I drive it around for a while to break in the engine, I then go to the track and see how it runs. My car with the free mods, and the stuff in my sig runs consistent 13.6s at the track, on street tires and no filter. Tires BTW are BFG g-force KDWs with 285 in rear and 275 in front.
08-27-2004, 11:57 AM
#66
Absolutely bone stock my car made 303.5rwhp and 319rwtq. It also went 13.5 @ 106 on a bad 2.2 60'. I was absolutely stock - tires, filter, everything. That was with 12K on the odo as well.
Now i'm heading to 20K, and I WILL have a 12 second slip before the end of this season!!!
Now i'm heading to 20K, and I WILL have a 12 second slip before the end of this season!!!
08-27-2004, 03:10 PM
#67
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The other, other, other A-Town, NM
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tomaSS
The SS stands for "Super Slow", so I vote the WS6.
08-28-2004, 07:41 AM
#70
Administrator
Originally Posted by TOMMY BOY74
Nothing beats the look of a WS6
I'm glad this post is in the noob forum. It's excusable that way.
08-28-2004, 10:31 AM
#72
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SugarLand Texas
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nocturnal SS
To answer your question. The Camaro SS and the Firehawk are the 2 fastest F bodys GM makes. One major reason is because after they are made they go to SLP and get better exhaust systems put on them. The WS6 goes someother place; and the exhaust system is not as good. The WS6 also weighs more. So totally stock the Camaro SS is faster than the WS6.
As far as the Firehawk is concern. I am not sure if it weighs more or less than the Camaro SS;i think it would be very close. In 53 degrees weather my 2002 Camaro SS totally stock went 12.96 at 107.8 It also is a Automatic!
As far as the Firehawk is concern. I am not sure if it weighs more or less than the Camaro SS;i think it would be very close. In 53 degrees weather my 2002 Camaro SS totally stock went 12.96 at 107.8 It also is a Automatic!
I ran a 12.90 at 108 Stock in an automatic. Factory tires also. Z28
08-28-2004, 11:13 AM
#73
Originally Posted by Nocturnal SS
Nothing done to it.Just break in miles
Originally Posted by ICONZ28
I ran a 12.90 at 108 Stock in an automatic. Factory tires also. Z28
08-28-2004, 11:35 AM
#75
Originally Posted by BigBronco
search people.... im surprised JRP did not have an anurism when he saw this
here is what i think about this thread
here is what i think about this thread
08-28-2004, 07:35 PM
#79
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gloveperson
If we keep having threads like this one, when people search they will get the wrong info
08-28-2004, 08:49 PM
#80
Originally Posted by Tiger2o69
If we keep having? Thats one reason I dont like the search button. Half the things I find arent true or they are BS.
sshh jrp might here you say that