Mustang HP #s??
#1
Mustang HP #s??
Anybody know what a stock 98 Mustang GT horsepower ratings were? What about the Cobra? I got a buddy about to get one and I was wondering how the 4.6 stacks up against LS1s
#4
Originally Posted by jrp
any pre-99 car will get walked by an ls1, even with boost there not all that great.
Just ask a certain 99 Black GT running a ATI at 8#. Had to run him 3 times at the track to prove the point.
#5
Originally Posted by jrp
any pre-99 car will get walked by an ls1, even with boost there not all that great.
Stock 96-98 Gt 225hp
Stock 96-98 Cobra 305hp
#6
Originally Posted by GMCVT
I would agree on the GT but a boosted 96-98 Cobra could put down some decent #'s. But yeah, without blower not a chance in the hot place
Stock 96-98 Gt 225hp
Stock 96-98 Cobra 305hp
Stock 96-98 Gt 225hp
Stock 96-98 Cobra 305hp
Trending Topics
#8
A buddy of mine has a 97 Cobra that ran 12.09 @ 111mph with the stock motor and stock intake. They aren't all that slow
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
Last edited by Keenov; 11-25-2004 at 04:38 AM.
#9
Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
They really don't put down decent #'s even with boost. Remember that TV show, I think it was Horsepower TV, a while back that boosted a 96 GT and dynoed like 280 rwhp after? That's just sad...
I owned a 96 Cobra and in bone stock trim it put down 256hp@the wheels. So
there not that bad even in stock trim. Thats more than my stock 95Z28 put down. Coarse it didn't have the torque the ole Z had either.
#10
Originally Posted by Keenov
A buddy of mine has a 97 Cobra that ran 12.09 @ 111mph with the stock motor and stock intake. They aren't all that slow
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
You failed to mention he's running slicks, drag suspension, every bolt-on, and 4.56's. IMO, that sucks.
Oh, and the 98 2V got a *slight* boost in power over the 96/97. Nothing that will make any difference though.
#11
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
woopppttteeeedoooo
You failed to mention he's running slicks, drag suspension, every bolt-on, and 4.56's. IMO, that sucks.
Oh, and the 98 2V got a *slight* boost in power over the 96/97. Nothing that will make any difference though.
You failed to mention he's running slicks, drag suspension, every bolt-on, and 4.56's. IMO, that sucks.
Oh, and the 98 2V got a *slight* boost in power over the 96/97. Nothing that will make any difference though.
#12
i can say that a 96-98 gt is the slowest cars in the world, well almost
seriously, nothing other than a motor change will make these cars run
Stock they will run like 10.20's in the 1/8 ... my stock s-10 4.3 ran a 10.13
They are really sad. Cobras are alot faster but no match for an LS1 or even a LT1 in stock trim
seriously, nothing other than a motor change will make these cars run
Stock they will run like 10.20's in the 1/8 ... my stock s-10 4.3 ran a 10.13
They are really sad. Cobras are alot faster but no match for an LS1 or even a LT1 in stock trim
#13
people need to remember you could get a GT for a few thousand less and put about 500 into it and beat a Z28..... so for the most basic of everyday driving, the stang was a better deal *in the 5.0 days*
#14
Originally Posted by Full-Force
i can say that a 96-98 gt is the slowest cars in the world, well almost
seriously, nothing other than a motor change will make these cars run
Stock they will run like 10.20's in the 1/8 ... my stock s-10 4.3 ran a 10.13
They are really sad. Cobras are alot faster but no match for an LS1 or even a LT1 in stock trim
seriously, nothing other than a motor change will make these cars run
Stock they will run like 10.20's in the 1/8 ... my stock s-10 4.3 ran a 10.13
They are really sad. Cobras are alot faster but no match for an LS1 or even a LT1 in stock trim
#15
Originally Posted by ramairstyle00
people need to remember you could get a GT for a few thousand less and put about 500 into it and beat a Z28..... so for the most basic of everyday driving, the stang was a better deal *in the 5.0 days*
Last edited by GMCVT; 11-26-2004 at 10:54 AM.
#17
Originally Posted by ramairstyle00
people need to remember you could get a GT for a few thousand less and put about 500 into it and beat a Z28..... so for the most basic of everyday driving, the stang was a better deal *in the 5.0 days*
#19
Originally Posted by 12secondDream
even the newer 4.6's suck. i used to have a stock 97 LT1 and would stomp on them at the track all day long
Funny this thread came around because there is a red 98 Cobra that has just popped up here. The kid who got it actually came into my work (I work in parts) and was saying how fast it was and how Camaros are junk. Lucky for him I wasn't there when he said all that as I would have thrown down $100 to go right there. I'll wait until he comes back in
Ahhh the ignorance. Funny thing was he came in to price out euro tail lights for it.
#20
Originally Posted by Keenov
A buddy of mine has a 97 Cobra that ran 12.09 @ 111mph with the stock motor and stock intake. They aren't all that slow
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=157
and i thought my 3000 standing weight lt1 was a stripper...
stock they are 3400 lbs then add the average 200 lbs man... you got to drop 500! theres 1/2 a sec right there.