New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bone stock LS1 owners, what is your 1/4 time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2006, 03:17 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
doodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default bone stock LS1 owners, what is your 1/4 time?

l wonder if anybody has bone stock LS1 and has some track times recently..


l am curious, how would they run now..

thanks
Old 07-17-2006, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

well, i can give you a summary:

M6 cars have been driven into the high 12's (one magazine drove one to 12.89 i believe) off the showroom floor, but those are some drivin' SOB's. on the other hand, i've seen times in the 15's from people that really blew it expect 13's your first time out, depending on how well you can drive it'll be high or low.

with A4 cars, i see most 3.23 geared cars in the 13.3 range and 2.73 cars in the mid to high 13's, though i've seen some near 13 flat's. i have a 2.73 car but have never been to the track so i can't give you any first hand experience. all i can tell you is my old V6 3.4L firebird ran a best of 16.7 @ 80mph
Old 07-17-2006, 09:46 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
 
Cali SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I consistantly ran 13.3 to 13.1 with mph between 108-109. It's an M6 car
Old 07-17-2006, 09:55 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
01MMMZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hubert, NC
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You wont find to many people that have a bone stock fbody. That is truely a rare thing. When I was stock I ran 13.3 @ 106 mph. 2.2 60' stock tires. That should be about the average.
Old 07-17-2006, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
doodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys..
Old 07-17-2006, 11:01 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
bikemanx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

boy low altitude must be nice lol. when mine was stock I ran a best of 14.45@96mph way up here at 5300ft where the altitude density easily reaches 7000 or more on a regular basis. After the addition of a lid, headers, and 3" duals I got a couple runs in the other night and got down to a 14.2 @99mph, yay still in the 14's lol. High altitude sucks.
Old 07-17-2006, 11:21 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
well, i can give you a summary:

M6 cars have been driven into the high 12's (one magazine drove one to 12.89 i believe) off the showroom floor, but those are some drivin' SOB's. on the other hand, i've seen times in the 15's from people that really blew it expect 13's your first time out, depending on how well you can drive it'll be high or low.

with A4 cars, i see most 3.23 geared cars in the 13.3 range and 2.73 cars in the mid to high 13's, though i've seen some near 13 flat's. i have a 2.73 car but have never been to the track so i can't give you any first hand experience. all i can tell you is my old V6 3.4L firebird ran a best of 16.7 @ 80mph
yeah but that was prolli with a vette LS1, they make more power and are more aero. dynamic, i can see it in that but not an f body straight from the factory.
Old 07-17-2006, 11:29 AM
  #8  
Launching!
 
tirefryer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran 13.25-13.30's @107-109 bone stock. It's an M6 and I live in NJ where we are at almost sea level and I had good cool air. It was in the 40's that night.
Old 07-17-2006, 11:29 AM
  #9  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls1charged
yeah but that was prolli with a vette LS1, they make more power and are more aero. dynamic, i can see it in that but not an f body straight from the factory.
is this post a joke? seriously, i can't tell if you're screwing with me or not. the vette LS1 and f-body LS1 made the same amount of power, it was the same engine. f-bodies were underrated to make the vette look like its 20,000 dollar extra price tag came with more hp. i'm not sure which claim you are refuting either. M6 f-bodies have gone 12's off the showroom floor. a certain magazine ran a 12.89. ask around, someone will verify me.

as for A4's, 3.23's are generally low to mid 13's with 13.3 being common and 2.73 cars are usually mid to high 13's, a 13.7 is a safe bet.

here's a little info about the 'vette LS1 vs. the f-body LS1.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/new-ls1-owners-newbie-tech/458711-general-et-hp-database-what-s-your-1-4-mile-time.html

here's a pic of two cars dynoed, one is an LS1 f-body and the other is an LS1 vette. the f-body actually dynoed higher, likely because of its solid rear axel vs. the vette's independent rear suspension.

Old 07-17-2006, 11:34 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
NightWindDriftr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Key West, FL / Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1charged
yeah but that was prolli with a vette LS1, they make more power and are more aero. dynamic, i can see it in that but not an f body straight from the factory.
A Corvette's LS1 does not make more power than a Z28's/TA's. That's like the strange assumption that WS6s and SSs are faster than their non-SLP'd counterparts.
Old 07-17-2006, 12:01 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
is this post a joke? seriously, i can't tell if you're screwing with me or not. the vette LS1 and f-body LS1 made the same amount of power, it was the same engine. f-bodies were underrated to make the vette look like its 20,000 dollar extra price tag came with more hp. i'm not sure which claim you are refuting either. M6 f-bodies have gone 12's off the showroom floor. a certain magazine ran a 12.89. ask around, someone will verify me.

as for A4's, 3.23's are generally low to mid 13's with 13.3 being common and 2.73 cars are usually mid to high 13's, a 13.7 is a safe bet.

here's a little info about the 'vette LS1 vs. the f-body LS1.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=458711

here's a pic of two cars dynoed, one is an LS1 f-body and the other is an LS1 vette. the f-body actually dynoed higher, likely because of its solid rear axel vs. the vette's independent rear suspension.

yeah your right, i was under the assumpiton that the vettes did make more power. but i was looking around after i posted and realized they didnt. i wasnt thinking right, i knew that the 01 and 02 years came with the LS6 intake and forgot that the f bodies came with the same thing those years, my bad.
Old 07-17-2006, 12:10 PM
  #12  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

well the vettes may make more power due to their different intake/exhaust setup but i doubt it's more than 5 hp or so, nothing significant. i wasn't yelling or anything, sorry if i came off rude or anything.
Old 07-17-2006, 12:16 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
miamifan3413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LaGrange, KY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

13.4 Bonestock @ 104
Old 07-17-2006, 12:26 PM
  #14  
teh PuRpL3z
iTrader: (5)
 
DrEvyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Only car I ran bone stock was my '99 Trans Am A4/3.23, and it hit 13.509 @ 102.5 mph.
Old 07-17-2006, 12:27 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
99Hawk262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

13.6 bonestock at 103......first run ever so I can see 13.3's with a little practice. A4/3.23 by the way. First run after LT and TD install was 13.2. Each time I raced after the install I would drop .1.....attributed to my learning how to launch better. I ended up with a 12.98 and am awaiting new times with the converter.
Old 07-17-2006, 12:52 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
well the vettes may make more power due to their different intake/exhaust setup but i doubt it's more than 5 hp or so, nothing significant. i wasn't yelling or anything, sorry if i came off rude or anything.
no problem, hey if someone can run 12's dead stock congrats. to them cause thats some suriouse driving.
Old 07-17-2006, 01:11 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
Cobra2WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South FLORIDA
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

13.4@107
Old 07-17-2006, 01:12 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
jason5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

12.98 @ 110mph bone stock, street tires 6 speed car

Last edited by jason5; 07-17-2006 at 03:17 PM.
Old 07-17-2006, 01:25 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
 
john shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hazelwood,Mo.
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

13.6 @103 was the most common numbers when I was bone stock.
Old 07-17-2006, 02:06 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Camaroz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tony (Nine Ball) Ran a 12.84 @ 104 in a bone stock M6


Quick Reply: bone stock LS1 owners, what is your 1/4 time?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.