HP gains from Mods?
#41
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LaGrange, KY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wanted to give him chance to prove it Your thinking what i'm thinking. My boy has a 2002 NBM Firehawk A4 with 90/90, MS4 Cam, Flowtech LT's, Corsa exhaust w/ cutout and Strange 12 bolt and only puts down around 380ish to the wheels. RevXtreme dyno'ed and did all the work on his ride. It's not believeable till I see a dyno chart.
Last edited by miamifan3413; 05-02-2008 at 11:36 PM.
#42
Here is the dyno graph. It was done by Engineered Victories in Davison, MI
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...sDynoGraph.jpg
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...sDynoGraph.jpg
#44
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the dyno graph. It was done by Engineered Victories in Davison, MI
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...sDynoGraph.jpg
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...sDynoGraph.jpg
#45
The 330/347 was after the mods but before any sort of tuning. The 350/366 was after dyno tuning.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
Last edited by Turbo91Bird; 05-03-2008 at 02:35 AM.
#48
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LaGrange, KY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 330/347 was after the mods but before any sort of tuning. The 350/366 was after dyno tuning.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
#51
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 330/347 was after the mods but before any sort of tuning. The 350/366 was after dyno tuning.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
I scanned the wrong graph it looks like Lorein, sorry about that.
The dyno is a dynocom, which is similar to a dynojet. So look at these numbers as dynojet numbers and not mustang dyno numbers.
His numbers are not "BS".
I don't know why you guys are giving him such a hard time. A lot of people on here even said he would be around 340-350 on a dynojet.
#52
(There might be other reasons also. Dyno freaks can chime in if they would like to add or correct me).
So the Dynojet numbers will be larger then the Mustang dyno numbers.