projected vs non-projected plugs
they use a longer reach .708(most heads)
the image looks like an old school ford or chevy plug for a stock head.
whats your setup and maybe i could get you in the right direction.
i never ran the accel plugs in anything. just one of those things my brain tells me to stay away from so i listen to it.
Robert
Robert
Robert
too much timing with TR7's and a 150 shot is no different than too much timing with 11's and a 300 shot. The 7's are the proper heat range plug for a 150 shot and the 11's are the proper heat range plug for a 300 shot. Therefore the desired timing mark should stay in the same place.
Robert
Last edited by TT632; Jan 13, 2010 at 03:43 PM.
the timing mark on them with the nickel coating is insane. looks like you drew a line with a sharpie marker, very nice.
however. the coating makes it difficult to screw into the head if you have awkward header tubes, and the fact that my socket gets stuck on them.
i havent put a mic on the porcelain, but i can guarantee is larger than an NGK.
got to wiggle the socket off around a hot header=no fun.
ngk screws in by hand, and socket comes off very easy.
that makes and breaks a plug for me unless the plug picks up et, it aint worth running, IMO.
n/a i get a lil aggressive with timing.
its worth a few hundreths and prolly a 1/2 mph on my current setup.
i keep th mark towards the threads, just outside the bend.
HOWEVER.... on my previous nitrous setups, i never get in the bend. i want it on the flat. keep the plug cool.
you can lean the motor out and go faster and more safe than you can with kicking a couple degrees of timing to it.
"lean is mean, hot is not."
what all the old guys say anyway. they have seen enough motors blow, so i take the advice.
a buddy of mine just hurt a piston with a hot plug in his motor. the timing was so high, along with the hot plug, the timing mark was way down on the 1st thread of the plug, nowhere on the strap.
i would go with the br6ef if you want to spray it, in my opinion. 7 would be a really safe bet, but i would try the 6 and see how she looks.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
too much timing with TR7's and a 150 shot is no different than too much timing with 11's and a 300 shot. The 7's are the proper heat range plug for a 150 shot and the 11's are the proper heat range plug for a 300 shot. Therefore the desired timing mark should stay in the same place.
OK, now on to round two. What is your determining factor for your location. There is more to it than a simple MPH increase. But want to hear your side first.
By the way, I have the exact answer as to why I can run more timing on a 150 shot than you do, and for the others that think mine is to much timing, and still make max power. It is really quite simple, LOL. ATV should know, as we have talked about this before. Think 408 with bone stock LS6 heads... Remember, i have well over 300 passes on my car so have kind of an idea of what works. I could also run more timing with the 300 hit also, with no ill effect like I do with the 150, but choose not too. My back is killing me and I have to go lay down...
I don't think your wrong, and i don't think i am wrong. My next input will clarify.

Robert
Someone needs to take the tr6s off the list completely, but keep the br6ef listed.
no way saying you are wrong, but its good for the average guy to start conservative and self teach.
My car is pretty much a dedicated race car but my car isn't the only nitrous car that I tune....
In my opinion the timing mark being past the bend on a 150 shot with a 7 is no different than the timing mark being past the bend on a 300 shot with an 11 in it. I understand completely that the cylinder pressures are higher with the 300 shot and it is going to build more heat but that is one of the reasons for the colder plug. It is also my opinion that if the timing mark is getting close to the threads then I am getting close to nipping a plug.
I would rather just step up the jet size than throw more timing at the smaller jet and push it to go faster. If I were in a class that limited my jet size then I'm sure I would push the setup harder but unless that is the case, I see no reason to run the timing that high.
If you don't mind me asking, how much timing are you running with your 300 shot Robert? Also, what plugs and gas.
Still, the point overall is this, the LSx due to the great Volumetric Efficiency (VE) from the get go, needs less over all timing n/a to get max power compared to motors of past. Hell, some of the cars over at Yellowbullet are starting with 40° timing n/a, and even after pulling for the spray it seems like an ungodly amount to run on the spray (think low VE). However, they are doing fine. It has to do with the heads they are running, like ATV stated.
Here's something interesting that will get the point across on how great, or Volumetric Efficient these motors are. If we look at recent history we will see that injector sizing has been using .5 as the standard multiplier for Brake Specific Fuel Consumption math, for non boosted cars. Well, if you use the math I have in my write up using the standard equation with this ratio, it's good for most motors, but not the LSx. This first came to light when guys had started telling me my math was way to conservative, and the injectors were being sized to large. I thought oh well, the BSFC math I use (my formula is a variation of the standard just simplified) has been the standard for 30 years that I know of. I got to thinking about this. A fully built race motor runs a BSFC of .450, or close, for many years, and some dipping even lower now. So I decided to see what the GM engineers were using to size the LS6 injectors, which are 28lb'ers. the math shows that they used the .450 to size, and the math works out exactly. The first production motor to have a BSFC of .450 on the planet. GM got these motors right, from the get go and they are getting better and better.
Now some of you are wondering why we need to pull timing at all on the spray and why the LSx needs more, or likes more pulled than other motors. When we are spraying it speeds up the flame front so fast that we are actually lighting the power stroke when the piston is still moving upwards on the compression stroke. Think of it this way, the piston is moving upwards and the cylinder ignites prematurely, so now we have the power being made fighting an upwards traveling piston (pre-ignition that leads to detonation). It should light right at the top when it's time for the piston to go down on the power stroke, rather than upwards traveling. Then again due to how good the heads are on the LSx this happens even quicker and deeper into the compression stroke so pulling timing is what brings things back to a normal sequence, or re-times things correctly, and we need more pulled than most other motors due to a better VE. More timing needs pulled the bigger you go to get things re-timed for a sprayed motor as it gets worse as more nitrous gets to the cylinder.
VE is a measurement to determine how well any air pump is pumping. We shoot for 100%, but due to friction, that is not going to happen on an internal combustion engine. Maybe low 90% area is doable? or it may be stuck in the 80s? Production motors, IIRC, are like 60/70% efficient? However, it does relate directly with a BSFC measurement.
Hopefully this makes some sense. I know I go off on a tangent sometimes but believe this all to be related. If something doesn't make sense let me know as I can go into better detail on any point and often have a 1000 things popping into my head at once so it may seem jumbled a bit, LOL. If I am boring you guys you can tell me that too.

Robert
My car is pretty much a dedicated race car but my car isn't the only nitrous car that I tune....
In my opinion the timing mark being past the bend on a 150 shot with a 7 is no different than the timing mark being past the bend on a 300 shot with an 11 in it. I understand completely that the cylinder pressures are higher with the 300 shot and it is going to build more heat but that is one of the reasons for the colder plug. It is also my opinion that if the timing mark is getting close to the threads then I am getting close to nipping a plug.
I would rather just step up the jet size than throw more timing at the smaller jet and push it to go faster. If I were in a class that limited my jet size then I'm sure I would push the setup harder but unless that is the case, I see no reason to run the timing that high.
If you don't mind me asking, how much timing are you running with your 300 shot Robert? Also, what plugs and gas.
I listen to the same guys, however, most of those telling the secrets don't have as much time and experience as I do. My first kit was on a 56 Chevy in 1976, IIRC, and there was no one to ask, no dynos, no books, and only basic kits, no safety stuff or knowledge at all. The first motor I ever hurt was my LS6, you'll like this, due to too much timing. So I was one of the first to learn 1st hand how we need to pull timing and gobs of it when going big on the LSx. I also had the 1st LSx, a '97 and had a dry kit on that when everyone was telling me I would blow it up, never hurt it, but didn't go big either.
Anyway, I am not trying to make it out like I am the only one whom knows anything, but rather just sharing my experiences, like you. Your in the top 10 knowledgeable guys on here. ATV and Shiz, are two others that have independently come to the same conclusions I have about the LSx. Things I talk about are things I have done or are doing. Sometimes I get corrected, and that is always welcome. You made me think twice about what I rec for timing, and surely will be more conservative in my suggestions in the future. Like you said, better safe than sorry.
By the way, the last time out with the 408 I ran 14° of total timing with the 300 shot in dual stage. I would pull even more should I put the entire 300 in at once down low... I do know of one whom is running Zero degrees with a dry shot and a LSx. Now if I had your heads on my motor would 14° be good, likely not.

Robert
no way saying you are wrong, but its good for the average guy to start conservative and self teach.
Here's something that has been bothering me for some time. All of the nitrous vendors that are here currently and in the past, have stated no timing pull is needed if stock timing is still stock and a hit of 150 or lower. It's kind of true. However, if one takes a magnified light and really looks at the plug, often times there is the aluminum transfer from the piston, like the picture above (detonation, ask me how I know, LOL). Short term, no problem, long term problem potential. that thinking comes from past thinking of cars that are very low VE. IMO, the LSx will run better if we pull timing on any amount to get the internal timing correct. I have been wanting to call BS on this, and other blanket nitrous tuning statement, like A/F ratio and plugs and... but am not going into all that now, LOL. Maybe we can use this thread to wake everyone up on the need to be conservative with our timing when spraying?
Man this is great, remove one or two guys that cause problems and we can have a really good, meaningful nitrous talk. I know I am enjoying the hell of it.

Robert

Like ATV said, there is more than one way to skin a nitrous cat....
I like your write up on VE, I think it will help some others on here understand things a little better.
There is one issue that I couldn't agree more with you on... The sponsors. I better keep my mouth shut or I will likely disappear LOL. I do have a funny pic I'd like to share if I can dig it up though.
Can someone help me out here? They are recommending a tr-6 for a h/c 150 shot 6.0





