propane\nitrous?
If you have any doubts check this out:
http://www.propane.ca/english/rego_page1.asp
<small>[ November 10, 2002, 07:16 PM: Message edited by: dennis ]</small>
for some antiknock effect. I guess this may
be why people think you can make more power,
you can up the cylinder pressure without
detonation.
However, propane gas isn't going to have
the energy density of vaporized gasoline
(heavier molecules, more combustibles in
same volume @ pressure/temp, so more of
the intake charge can be air / oxidizer
with gasoline than with propane).
Whether it's intake efficiency or detonation
which limit your maximum power, would tell
you whether propane would be worth the try.
I have talked to a few of them, only one had any idea about the system, and said he ran it with 200 psi of LP, and 1100 of N20.
take it for what its worth. Thats just what i was told.
Ryan.
Trending Topics
I have heard some people that run n2o/propane kits that they do not have to retard timing. this will allow a comparible propane wet shot to have more power then the dry shot.
I guess people are always afriad to try somthing new, thats why some people will always be leading others.
<small>[ November 12, 2002, 09:52 AM: Message edited by: smokinHawk ]</small>
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The benefits are definately apparent:
1. No risk of fuel falling out of suspension (puddling)
2. No strain/demand on fuel system.
3. High resistance to detonation (~140 octane)
4. Low cost and high availibility of Propane.
The drawbacks:
1. Two high pressure cylinders in vehicle (one of which IS flamable)
2. Premature O2 sensor failure.
3. Tuning perameters are not well defined.
Seems like a interesting venture for someone to take on but I'm not sure what the real market instrest in the package would be.
BTW- I know a few of the NOS R&D guys are playing with propane as we speak...NOS is headquarterd about 20 mins from here. They still do a lot of dabbling outside of Holley's intrest.
Richard
I've posted on this subject a while ago, and was told it is from 104-110 octane.
also, why will it kill O2's quick? just wondering.
Ryan.
If you have seen the deposits left on an O2 sensor from a vehicle using propane you can see the heavy residual deposits left behind. It is compareable to the "bright red/orange" deposits left in combustion chambers freom a vehicle using high concentrations of octane booster or injector cleaner. While the O2 sensors don't necessarily fail the become "lazy" much sooner. These same red/orange depost accumulate around the sensor element as in the combustion chamber.
That does make sense of the hihg octane, and making them lazy, and this would make sense to be 120+ octane. As 104 should not have this kind of effect.
this is just an old thread on this subject if anybody wants to read it.
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread...hlight=propane
Ryan.
Now the research i have done, every one injects the propane after the MAF before the throttle body.
and some inject the nitrous after or before the MAF.
I talked to BTR and they inject the nitrous before the MAF and the propane after.
so propane after n2o before or after, depending if you want to richen it up so the incoming nitrous afects the MAF.
<small>[ November 15, 2002, 05:54 AM: Message edited by: smokinHawk ]</small>






