Contemplating an -8AN feed line? Read this first!
-6 AN VS -8 AN
When does a bigger main feed line help flow vs hurt flow? You may be surprise to discover bigger is not always better. I have racers always calling me wanting a 8 AN feed line on smaller tune up applications because they were told it would increase flow. So today I am going to provide you with a comparison flow data of -6 AN VS -8 AN.
The direct port intake that we are using for comparison flow data has .122 Nitrous solenoids and .187 fuel solenoids feeding SBT nozzles.
The only thing we will change when swapping to an 8AN feed line is the Y and the feed line.
The System was flowed at 850 psi
You decide if its helping or hurting flow.
-6 AN
.026 Jet = 792 PPH 30 PSI Drop
.036 Jet = 1360.8 PPH 59 PSI Drop
.041 Jet = 1706.4 PPH 58 PSI Drop
.057 Jet = 2642.4 PPH 93 PSI Drop
-8 AN
.026 Jet = 691.2 PPH 36 PSI Drop
.036 Jet = 1245.6 PPH 51 PSI Drop
.041 Jet = 1778.4 PPH 74 PSI Drop
.057 Jet = 2692.8 PPH 103 PSI Drop
Thanks,
Garrett
Dave
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
we lost a fair amount of pph the dP wasn't as bad... noticed some interesting things on the outlet side if the nitrous solenoid too..
this was with an IS Sledgehammer plate on jetting above 075 (x 2)
There were no adapter or reducer fittings used in this test. The only thing changed was the Y fitting, feed line and bottle nut. It was changed from a 6anX6anX6an Y to an 8anX6anX6an Y fitting. The bottle nut went from 6an to 8an.
I actually saw different results with my car... We had to change to -6 for Ultra Street. I log nitrous pressure at the bottle and after the solenoid... -6 to -8 caused the pressure drop to go up almost 70psi. Also all my tunes(78 jets and higher) were fat....
each test the flow gets smaller differece as the jet goes up
I'm restricted to a -4 feed. I have 4' line to a 1/4 turn valve then another 4' line to solenoid and -4 lines from solenoid to plate is what Lance and Dave came up with. I'd like to know if there's more on the table for the days I'm not "Class" racing
I'm restricted to a -4 feed. I have 4' line to a 1/4 turn valve then another 4' line to solenoid and -4 lines from solenoid to plate is what Lance and Dave came up with. I'd like to know if there's more on the table for the days I'm not "Class" racing
-6 AN VS -8 AN
When does a bigger main feed line help flow vs hurt flow? You may be surprise to discover bigger is not always better. I have racers always calling me wanting a 8 AN feed line on smaller tune up applications because they were told it would increase flow. So today I am going to provide you with a comparison flow data of -6 AN VS -8 AN.
The direct port intake that we are using for comparison flow data has .122 Nitrous solenoids and .187 fuel solenoids feeding SBT nozzles.
The only thing we will change when swapping to an 8AN feed line is the Y and the feed line.
The System was flowed at 850 psi
You decide if its helping or hurting flow.
-6 AN
.026 Jet = 792 PPH 30 PSI Drop
.036 Jet = 1360.8 PPH 59 PSI Drop
.041 Jet = 1706.4 PPH 58 PSI Drop
.057 Jet = 2642.4 PPH 93 PSI Drop
-8 AN
.026 Jet = 691.2 PPH 36 PSI Drop
.036 Jet = 1245.6 PPH 51 PSI Drop
.041 Jet = 1778.4 PPH 74 PSI Drop
.057 Jet = 2692.8 PPH 103 PSI Drop
in the data.
The .036 test flows 1360.8 PPH with a 59 PSI drop.
The .041 test flows 1706.4 PPH with a 58 PSI drop.
If the starting bottle parameters for both tests are equal (volume/weight
and pressure/temp) I find it difficult to understand how the results
show a 25% (346/1360.8) flow increase while bottle shows
a decrease in pressure drop. (59 vs 58)
What's your thoughts?
Last edited by magnum-gto; Jun 6, 2015 at 08:12 AM.







