nozzle shootout results
one nozzle that surprised me was the dynotune nozzle. it was right up there with the SHO and TNT. for a tiny nozzle, it put up a good fight. as far as the predator goes, well, maybe it's just my car. who knows. they are supposed to have another test performed shortly.
Thanks for all the hard work. One HUGE factor that I see that makes me scratch my head is the Dyno-tune nozzle is our standard nozzle that is in all of our kits. I'm saying "exact" same because they get them from one of our larger dealers that we supply!!! That being said, we know exactly how it performs against the Predator and it does not keep up. So, either the Dyno has a +/- factor of greater than X or something else was causing the odd results. Either way the best test is at the track. So pill it to kill it!!!
So.... your saying that Cold Fusion produces the dynotune nozzle???????
So.... Cold Fusion produces the dynotune nozzle???????[/QUOTE]
YES. However, we do not know if they port or do modifications to it once they receive it. As i stated earlier they buy from a supplier that we supply. look at the picture it even has the brass nozzle fittings and we are the only company that makes those in brass without plating!!!! The nozzle is more like the NOS pro race nozzle than the vortec. the vortec is a bit different but same shape.
give me a brake, go to the track test them out, buy a kit because you want it, because you like it, or because of a test done in one of the biggest bs forums around
by a kit that works for you and go for it.
the test is great, but to me, alot of waisted time that didnt prove a point.
prove a point, and make the af exact on every run, ect ect. then maybe, but like stated befor, heat soak, bla bla bla then comes into effect.
oh well.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
What this really shows me...bottom line...its all about the flow capabilties of the entire kit. Nitrous flow = hp. Nitrous flow is MUCH more a factor in total HP than nozzle design.
For you guys to show that one nozzle has some type of advantage over another...your REALLY going to have to tighten the resolution on the testing. So much so that agin...I would say the differences are negligable.
To me manufacturer claims of overall nozzle superiority at medium HP levels are dead. I might focus on testing the limits of HP and consistency of tune at the very high flow rates and component quality.
Sorry to beat a dead horse but I do feel somewhat vindicated for the post I made a few months ago.
Here is a link to that post.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/nitrous-oxide/456725-discussion-nitrous-nozzle-design-important.html
The initial idea was:
I say that because I have yet to see any REAL evidence to the contrary. No one has done a test and posted proof that was not "tainted" in some way. The testing was always stopped short.
ok..headed to the track to spray a 225 on the stock shortblock and shoot for deep 9s.

one thing to be learned here if anything is to wideband tune the nitrous. once i put the a/f ratios up, you'll notice how far in variance the readings are. granted none really got into a danger zone, IMO. but, some were in the 13:1 range, some were in the 12:1 range.
Al, you sir, have been declared vindicated! I just wanted to see any one of them jump far beyond all others, so I could WOW or something in reply. And or see an old *** nozzle that wouldnt be able to flow for its life so all the newer nozzles look awesome
Good thing, I can picture the results in my head. I guess I will continue to piece meal my nitrous stuff as I see fit, or find sales.


