MAF Vs. Speed density
The only reason to ditch the MAF is if your cam is so huge that you are getting reversion into your MAF and it's messing up your idle and low speed driveability.
I run MAF only, in fact, on my 2011 Silverado.....just the opposite.
Force open loop idle through PE table
or
run open loop full time (what I do)
or
spend a LOT of time trying to tune your closed loop tables to get the O2 sensors to read right and stop overfueling idle (good luck)
Force open loop idle through PE table
or
run open loop full time (what I do)
or
spend a LOT of time trying to tune your closed loop tables to get the O2 sensors to read right and stop overfueling idle (good luck)
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
go bad, which you can easily avoid. It makes for a
much steadier low end fueling in my experience (MAP
surge, gone when enabled) and is pretty accurate
right out of the box unless you have no screen and
a really bent inlet tract.
SD puts you at the mercy of environment (IAT) and
needs redone for minor mods because pushing reality
updates into the VE table is all on you.
The only good reason for ditching the MAF is when
your setup grows a third nut and you pull more air
than it can meter. Until then its consistency is your
daily driver friend.
There is nothing wrong with SD, I ran my stroker setup SD because I was maxing out the flow limits of the PCM NA and didn't want to scale the injectors to make it work, so I ditched it to run SD. However on setups that are more mild it's no benefit really to delete it. My Formula which is a cam only car has an OE 85mm truck MAF on it and does no different with it on or off.



