PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo

New Delphi LS1 MAF design

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 04:59 PM
  #1  
ZexGX's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 16
From: under a JEGS hat
Talking New Delphi LS1 MAF design

Delphi P/N AF10056 is the new redesigned version of the stock LS1 MAF. Does anybody know if these are any better than a stock LS1 MAF in terms of its maximum reading limit, airflow, or consistency? This style does not have the internal air foil like the traditional LS1 MAF.

Check it out:
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
Sommer86's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Back in Burbank, CA
Default

I dont think it's new, but I haven' seen one yet, but have read about them for a while.
they're cheap on Amazon too...

Delphi AF10056 Air Flow Sensor
by Delphi
Be the first to review this item | Like (0)
List Price: $309.66
Price: $102.50 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
You Save: $207.16 (67%)
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

I'd love to hear a review on one.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #3  
jimmyblue's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 7
From: East Central Florida
Default

I don't like the look of that skyscraper in the middle, to me
it seems likely worse for obstruction / turbulence than the
old airfoil design. Of course the screen is the larger problem
still.

I'd stick with the old style, minus screen, and a Holden MAF
table, if I were staying with a 75mm piece.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
ramairetransam's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Default

good find , id like some more info
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #5  
Mike454SS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 9
From: South Windsor, CT
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
I don't like the look of that skyscraper in the middle, to me
it seems likely worse for obstruction / turbulence than the
old airfoil design. Of course the screen is the larger problem
still.

I'd stick with the old style, minus screen, and a Holden MAF
table, if I were staying with a 75mm piece.
Why do you think the screen is the problem? I couldn't disagree with you more.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
ramairetransam's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Default

has anyone tried one of these.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
JaYZeig's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 599
Likes: 1
From: plainfield, il
Default

hm, i wonder if an ls7 maf would bolt to that pipe
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:41 PM
  #8  
jimmyblue's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 7
From: East Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Mike454SS
Why do you think the screen is the problem? I couldn't disagree with you more.
Because I've measured the pressure drop across it (the old style stocker) with
and without.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:45 PM
  #9  
ZexGX's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 16
From: under a JEGS hat
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Because I've measured the pressure drop across it (the old style stocker) with
and without.
I've talked with a lot of tuners, and most of them say to leave the screen in because it results in more consistent MAF readings.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 02:25 AM
  #10  
dr_whigham's Avatar
The Scammer Hammer
Veteran: Marine Corps
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 24
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

You could always change it for a Saxon screen... cures the turbulence problem while reducing the surface area of the screen as well as increasing the screen hole-size....

Also, yeah, I'd like to know if you could use a card MAF in a tube like that; Properly tuned, of course. It seems a lot of the 100mm MAF's just read odd at part throttle due to the ID increase and the slowed airflow.

I wonder if a card MAF would work in a housing like the one pictured?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 06:22 PM
  #11  
sjsingle1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,745
Likes: 291
From: Fort Worth TX
Default

i have 1..........got it on ebay.....it works is all i can say
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 06:24 PM
  #12  
ramairetransam's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 75
From: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Default

Originally Posted by sjsingle1
i have 1..........got it on ebay.....it works is all i can say
good to hear, and why did gm update this , were they starting to have problems with people buying junk aftermarket ones. im just surprised they put money and time into it .
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2012 | 06:34 PM
  #13  
sjsingle1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,745
Likes: 291
From: Fort Worth TX
Default

think the plastic design is much cheaper than aluminum housing of the old design
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 08:39 AM
  #14  
Mike454SS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 9
From: South Windsor, CT
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Because I've measured the pressure drop across it (the old style stocker) with
and without.
Laminar flow is much more important than a minor pressure drop in anything other than a track only drag car.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #15  
jimmyblue's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 7
From: East Central Florida
Default

So you think that the flow through the "screen" is laminar? Or around
that fat square pecker in the new MAF (plus screen)? Yeah. So just
how does removing the screen damage laminar flow, as if it had any
relevance here?

The "minor pressure drop" equals the contribution of the stock lid at
shop-vac flow rates. Worse for sure at what a hungry V8 can pull.
Go ahead and leave that on the table.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 10:07 PM
  #16  
NEokcTERROR's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

It's not a screen like your screen door. It's an airflow straightener that smooths the airflow over the entire cross sectional area of the tube. It isn't there to keep cockroaches out of your MAF.

Those of you who think de-screening your MAF increases power. What exactly are your MPH increases in 1/4 to backup your theory?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 10:14 PM
  #17  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Descreening the maf seems to be worth .1 and 1mph. I've tried it on several different vehicles with the same result.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 12:38 AM
  #18  
zacht's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Default

im in the process of stepping up to a 100mm maf. just people asking about that tube working with a card style maf. the spectre does!


ebay!
spectre 9705 maf housing (4 in) 32 bucks shipped
LS7 maf 56 bucks shipped
3 to 5 maf harness 16 bucks shipped
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 06:18 AM
  #19  
LS1MCSS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 8
From: Dover, Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by ramairetransam
good to hear, and why did gm update this , were they starting to have problems with people buying junk aftermarket ones. im just surprised they put money and time into it .
They switched to this type so they could replace the three wire and five wire MAF with one p/n. Cheaper for them in the long run, fewer parts to stock.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #20  
NEokcTERROR's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Descreening the maf seems to be worth .1 and 1mph. I've tried it on several different vehicles with the same result.
Hmmm. I can't say I have had very consistent results from it. Back to back, same day, pass after pass results have always varied going back and forth. Usually .1-.3mph and not always higher with the straightener removed.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.