How much did GM spend tuning LS1 GTOs?
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much did GM spend tuning LS1 GTOs?
So I looked at a LS1 GTO tune vs a 03/04 Z06 tune and WOW. The VE table on the GTO looked like a 2yr olds art project compared the smooth, perfectly peaking VE table on the Z. The Z PE table was appropriate and dipped were it needed to and was steady and smooth otherwise. The GTO PE was all over the place.
So GM spend 100% more time tuning the Z compared to a GTO?
So GM spend 100% more time tuning the Z compared to a GTO?
#3
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even the C5 tunes are better, I mean come on, at least make it look like you tried. Recovery from knock retard is ridiculous between the two with the Vette aggressively recovering and the GTO just like "Uh maybe in a hour I'll get to it".
#5
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your not being an ***. I get that they would put more effort into Vettes and specifically the Z06, but damn at least make it LOOK like you spent 5mins on the GTO tune. I'll see if I can get a picture of the stock VE table and how it looks like a stair case. Just hit the "smooth" button once!
#6
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh I brought this up because I just copied a Z06 VE table over to my GTO to "cut to the chase" with smoothing out my VE table. They peak at the same points but the GTO fails a cliff after peak while the Z06 levels off.
Trending Topics
#12
I know this is a super old thread, but what table are you seeing those graphs in? I'm looking at B0101 in my 2004 GTO tune (and a C5 Z06 tune) and seeing much different graphs. I've attached my current tune for reference. As an FYI, I'm also pretty new to EFILive.