EOIT for Gen 3 and overlap
Fortunately, the Gen 3 is pretty simple. Here is what I did/assumed.
02 Stock cam BTR Stage 2 Turbo (226/232-113+4)
IVO 9.5 ATDC IVO 5 BTDC
IVC 36.5 ABDC IVC 43 ABDC
EVO 37.5 BBDC EVO 53 BBDC
EVC -20.5 ATDC EVC -1 ATDC
OL -30 OL 4
EOIT Boundary stock 6.55
ECT ranges from 2.55 to 5.55 at RPM
So to keep the same valve train dynamics I wanted to adjust the boundary.
6.55*90 ~ 98 = 98 BTDC right? = 262 Boundary
Now subtract the Normal 6.55-5.55 = 1 = 15degrees BTDC
This makes sense? So normal the injection should start around 15 BTDC and complete around TDC or a little later which is still before 9.5 ATDC IVO stock?
New cam is 14.5 earlier (9.5+5) so I subtracted from 6.55 and got 5.58
This backs things up and it worked great. Car idles much better.
I wasnt sure how to handle the overlap but I assumed that if I back it up 14.5 I should always be the same dynamics and the boundary - normal should always put the injection complete before the IVO opens and hence overlap issue goes away? I tried adding the 4 deg overlap back in at 6.0 and it ran ok but didnt sound as great and had more fuel smell.
I left the ECT 5.55 values alone. I tried then looking at EVC closed event delta , 19.5 deg and add that to the ECT but it just ran richer no improvement. I played with + 1,1.2,.5 in ECT and it ran rich or nothing.
but this brought the Boundary close to TDC or in the overlap start I think.
Lowering the ECT some actually helped.
I am confused a little if my logic works or I just got lucky on the 5.58
I am leaving the ECT alone for now.
My question is not if it works for me but trying to understand the EOIT# in relation to the IVO? The EOIT is listed as ref pulses after (or before?) TDC.
So 6.55*15 = 98 minus 5.55x15 ~ 15 degrees ATDC for SOI start? or is BTDC?
I am trying to understand does the stock EOIT end point of 6.55 occure before or after the IVO?
If before then what I did makes total sense. and avoided half my fuel being in the middle of the 4 deg overlap.
If after then it helped some but injecting closer IVO allowing more time for fuel
When you change the EOIT like that, you have to go back into your VE table and lean it out in the idle regions. Even my 227/244 115 idles around 33 or so in the 800 column. Which is much much lower than it should be. But that's what modifying the EOIT is doing - it's allowing you to spray and waste less fuel. But you have to play with the 1200 column a lot as it's a transition column... especially in the lower kPa regions (where it will want to be richer with less timing) with those EOIT settings.
Best way to do it is to do Real Time Tuning (if you have a Custom OS) and you can just take the 800 column and lean it out 2% at a time (or do it with the VCM bi-directional controls) until you get it to stable idle without adaptive spark on. You'll see how much EOIT allows you to lower the VE in those regions.
My question still is how does this relate to EOIT and valve events and where are the SOIT/EOIT in relation to the overlap.
the IVC is about 19 deg longer then stock. The normal ECT table is 5.5 144F+
So adding 1.2 to the 5.5 number. I guess is same as shifting boundary 1 back?
I've just found that moving normal later aligns well with a longer IVC. It does allow for a lean out and cleans up some of the gas smell.
Trending Topics
EDIT: used wrong cam numbers before, fixed now
Last edited by patSS/00; Jan 13, 2018 at 05:54 PM. Reason: wrong numbers
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
so is that 98deg + 360 or + 0 either way it is 98 deg ATDC
then my IVO is 9.5 AFTDC stock so EOIT is ~ 89deg after IVO opens.
the normal is 5.55 ~ 83deg so 89-83 5 degres.
So SOIT is at best 5 degrees AFTER the IVO opens?
so is that 98deg + 360 or + 0 either way it is 98 deg ATDC
then my IVO is 9.5 AFTDC stock so EOIT is ~ 89deg after IVO opens.
the normal is 5.55 ~ 83deg so 89-83 5 degres.
So SOIT is at best 5 degrees AFTER the IVO opens?
Something like this work for figuring out where to set the normal table:
EVC (event) + 784 / 90 - 6.5 = normal
It works fine for me. Mine is at 370* currently.
As as far as this question goes, it plays into transient fueling, and atomization on a hot valve. This is stated in the previous response. There are many factors here on a modified engine though. Airflow, valve events, heat soak, injector size and so on add to the problem. You can however use your IVO as a start point and go from there. If you’re doing this to correct a lean or rich spike on your VE, look into transient fuel. Remember, any adjustments on EOIT will affect the transient fuel calculations, obviously.









