Optimum WOT AFR for street driving?
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Optimum WOT AFR for street driving?
I know this might be somewhat of a hotly-debated topic, but what does everyone think of as the optimum WOT AFR for a NA street setup? My cell 22 LTRIMS are still at +9 right now, so I'm trying to get them in line, and when I jump on the loud pedal, I'm watching my WB gauge go all the way down to 11.5:1!!! I figure that is pretty darn rich, and I am curious as to what I need to shoot for to lean it up to.... I was thinking 13.0:1, but I didn't know where the best power would be at? I want it to be as safe as possible without leaving much on the table. I'd rather err on the side of caution, but not err to darn much!
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
#3
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bardonia, NY
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllCammedUp
I figure that is pretty darn rich, and I am curious as to what I need to shoot for to lean it up to.... I was thinking 13.0:1, but I didn't know where the best power would be at? I want it to be as safe as possible without leaving much on the table. I'd rather err on the side of caution, but not err to darn much!
#4
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK I will be flamed for this but experience doesnt lie and with over 500LS1s under my belt and no blow ups...... I have my car @ 13.5:1 AFR It is where it makes best power (no cats). ALL CARS ARE DIFFERENT some will make best power @ 12.5AFR but that is very rare. Much depends on the cam, heads and exh sys. The AFR at the headers collector is different than what is coming out after a cat converter, it is usually richer. I will tune cars to 13.3 and I feel that they are very safe. I feel that timing is something that is just as equal an issue but as long as you are datalogging and no KR then 95% of the time you should be safe. Many time the car will knock and the sensors will not pick it up even when they are within the conditions of detecting.
Jeremy
Jeremy
#6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: hatboro, pa
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what about with cats through a tailpipe sniffer wideband. i was told by the tuner that you are off (up) about .5 through the cats so i got my car to an even 13.5 across the board. no detonation, 02's (hptuners) are around 860-880mv- so im guessing im right around 13.0? this guy has tuned lots of ls1's but i like to have more opinions on tuning w/ cats.
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
I wouldn't correlate your O2 values with an AFR reading. They may correlate on your particular car. Some folks log O2's and WOT AFR simultaneously to get an idea of what O2 readings correlate to which AFR readings and then try to get their O2's to match.
The last time I blindly tried to set my WOT AFR by using the 'suggested' range of .88-.89, my WOT AFR ended up being at 14-14.5 on the dyno. 13:1 on my car is ~920mv.
The last time I blindly tried to set my WOT AFR by using the 'suggested' range of .88-.89, my WOT AFR ended up being at 14-14.5 on the dyno. 13:1 on my car is ~920mv.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by JeremyF
OK I will be flamed for this but experience doesnt lie and with over 500LS1s under my belt and no blow ups...... I have my car @ 13.5:1 AFR It is where it makes best power (no cats). ALL CARS ARE DIFFERENT some will make best power @ 12.5AFR but that is very rare. Much depends on the cam, heads and exh sys. The AFR at the headers collector is different than what is coming out after a cat converter, it is usually richer. I will tune cars to 13.3 and I feel that they are very safe. I feel that timing is something that is just as equal an issue but as long as you are datalogging and no KR then 95% of the time you should be safe. Many time the car will knock and the sensors will not pick it up even when they are within the conditions of detecting.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Jeremy good info! and thanks for sharing it!
I don't think anyone could flame ya for stating your experiences ... but just in case... if people disagree ... remember it's better to state your opinion using G rated words... (being able to disagree and make a point w/out calling someone names or using unnecessary swear words is a sign of intelligence IMHO)
#9
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sleeperstyle: If a car has cats and mufflers and a sniffer in the tailpipe and you are tuning to 13.5:1 out the back than you should be roughly about 13.0 off of the collector. I think you have it right but it is getting late and my brain is swimming trying to build a bigger better TREX cam. hehehehe. gnight. Thank you guys for the support.
Jeremy
Jeremy
#10
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok guys, thanks a lot for the posts and the info - it helps out a lot.
An additional question I've got now after reading the replies is what RPM point should I shape the PE/RPM table at to start the transition from 12.6 to 12.9/13.0:1 for the max power?
Should I keep it at 12.6 up to 4500 RPM, then just lean it out to 12.9/13.0 at 4600RPM, or should I gradually step it up in increments as I approach redline and have the redline (6500) at 12.9/13.0? I guess dyno time is necessary for this at this point, but I'm curious as to what everyone thinks. I'd think a nice curve would be better than abrupt jumps, but I'm a self-admitted noob at this topic, so I don't know for sure.
Thanks!!
An additional question I've got now after reading the replies is what RPM point should I shape the PE/RPM table at to start the transition from 12.6 to 12.9/13.0:1 for the max power?
Should I keep it at 12.6 up to 4500 RPM, then just lean it out to 12.9/13.0 at 4600RPM, or should I gradually step it up in increments as I approach redline and have the redline (6500) at 12.9/13.0? I guess dyno time is necessary for this at this point, but I'm curious as to what everyone thinks. I'd think a nice curve would be better than abrupt jumps, but I'm a self-admitted noob at this topic, so I don't know for sure.
Thanks!!
#11
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
again, its different for every car. I have seen where if the area @ pk TQ is richer (12.7) it will make better power and the pk HP leaner (13.2) it gets the best of both worlds. But 9 out of 10 its better one way or the other all the way accross the board.
Jeremy Formato
Jeremy Formato
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by AllCammedUp
I know this might be somewhat of a hotly-debated topic, but what does everyone think of as the optimum WOT AFR for a NA street setup? My cell 22 LTRIMS are still at +9 right now, so I'm trying to get them in line, and when I jump on the loud pedal, I'm watching my WB gauge go all the way down to 11.5:1!!! I figure that is pretty darn rich, and I am curious as to what I need to shoot for to lean it up to.... I was thinking 13.0:1, but I didn't know where the best power would be at? I want it to be as safe as possible without leaving much on the table. I'd rather err on the side of caution, but not err to darn much!
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
There is no dramatic power loss between 13.5 and 12.5, an A/F of 12.5 @ WOT is where you need to be. If you put your car on a load based dyno, you will see that there is no big difference here. I am running 14.7 to 1 for driving around town, and in the VE table it appears to be everything from 0-55 KPA from 800RPM to 3500 RPM. Then I am running 12.1- 12.5 when the car goes into WOT.
This should not be taken as a recommendation but an example.
#14
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
I thought I would throw this out there. What is the difference between WOT on the street and anywhere else?,
There is no dramatic power loss between 13.5 and 12.5, an A/F of 12.5 @ WOT is where you need to be. If you put your car on a load based dyno, you will see that there is no big difference here. I am running 14.7 to 1 for driving around town, and in the VE table it appears to be everything from 0-55 KPA from 800RPM to 3500 RPM. Then I am running 12.1- 12.5 when the car goes into WOT.
This should not be taken as a recommendation but an example.
There is no dramatic power loss between 13.5 and 12.5, an A/F of 12.5 @ WOT is where you need to be. If you put your car on a load based dyno, you will see that there is no big difference here. I am running 14.7 to 1 for driving around town, and in the VE table it appears to be everything from 0-55 KPA from 800RPM to 3500 RPM. Then I am running 12.1- 12.5 when the car goes into WOT.
This should not be taken as a recommendation but an example.
#15
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a chart compliments of monodax
Here is a chart that I have that should give you some insight into what standards are for lean cruise etc...
9.0:1 BLACK SMOKE (NO POWER)
11.5:1 RICH BEST TORQUE @ WOT
12.2:1 SAFE BEST POWER @ WOT
13.3:1 LEAN BEST TORQUE @ WOT
14.6:1 STOCHIMETRIC AFR ( CHEMICALLY CORRECT )
15.5:1 LEAN CRUISE
16.5:1 BEST FUEL ECONOMY
18.0:1 CARBURETED LEAN LIMIT
22.0:1 EFI LEAN LIMIT
Here is a chart that I have that should give you some insight into what standards are for lean cruise etc...
9.0:1 BLACK SMOKE (NO POWER)
11.5:1 RICH BEST TORQUE @ WOT
12.2:1 SAFE BEST POWER @ WOT
13.3:1 LEAN BEST TORQUE @ WOT
14.6:1 STOCHIMETRIC AFR ( CHEMICALLY CORRECT )
15.5:1 LEAN CRUISE
16.5:1 BEST FUEL ECONOMY
18.0:1 CARBURETED LEAN LIMIT
22.0:1 EFI LEAN LIMIT
#17
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by AllCammedUp
Thanks, Bryan - there really is no difference between street and anywhere else - it's just that I don't drag my car, and as such, I don't need the all-out *****-to-the-wall config that is optimized for a 1/4 run, as I like to go the twisty route much more than the straight route!
Anyone that would offer any thoughts on this, I am interested in what you would have to say.
#18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by HumpinSS
Here is a chart compliments of monodax
Here is a chart that I have that should give you some insight into what standards are for lean cruise etc...
9.0:1 BLACK SMOKE (NO POWER)
11.5:1 RICH BEST TORQUE @ WOT
12.2:1 SAFE BEST POWER @ WOT
13.3:1 LEAN BEST TORQUE @ WOT
14.6:1 STOCHIMETRIC AFR ( CHEMICALLY CORRECT )
15.5:1 LEAN CRUISE
16.5:1 BEST FUEL ECONOMY
18.0:1 CARBURETED LEAN LIMIT
22.0:1 EFI LEAN LIMIT
Here is a chart that I have that should give you some insight into what standards are for lean cruise etc...
9.0:1 BLACK SMOKE (NO POWER)
11.5:1 RICH BEST TORQUE @ WOT
12.2:1 SAFE BEST POWER @ WOT
13.3:1 LEAN BEST TORQUE @ WOT
14.6:1 STOCHIMETRIC AFR ( CHEMICALLY CORRECT )
15.5:1 LEAN CRUISE
16.5:1 BEST FUEL ECONOMY
18.0:1 CARBURETED LEAN LIMIT
22.0:1 EFI LEAN LIMIT
Really, I would think that at 16.5 or higher piston life would be extremely limited.
#19
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
Really, I would think that at 16.5 or higher piston life would be extremely limited.
As long as you are under light load/cruising then there isnt a problem. Once you go under load you may want to richen it up a little so you dont put any holes in the pistons