PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo

How are most disabling PE mode in HPTuner (when SD tuning) ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2006 | 07:06 AM
  #1  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default How are most disabling PE mode in HPTuner (when SD tuning) ???

How are most disabling PE mode in HPTuner (when SD tuning) ???

Setting the MAP entry point to 100 for PE enable???

Old 04-09-2006 | 09:05 AM
  #2  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

i personally dont...i tune in open loop SD...pe is open loop so in my eyes its all the same...in the end your tuning the ve for a specific # whether that # is 13.0:1 or 14.7:1 the computer shouldnt care.
Old 04-09-2006 | 11:07 AM
  #3  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by foff667
i personally dont...i tune in open loop SD...pe is open loop so in my eyes its all the same...in the end your tuning the ve for a specific # whether that # is 13.0:1 or 14.7:1 the computer shouldnt care.
Ah... that is true... did not think of it that way...

Thanks,
Old 04-09-2006 | 11:09 AM
  #4  
dynocar's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Just set all your PE cells to 1.0
Old 04-09-2006 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dynocar
Just set all your PE cells to 1.0
Why would I set them to 1? As long as I am logging the commanded AFR (I use high res) PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree...
Old 04-09-2006 | 01:44 PM
  #6  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Why would I set them to 1? As long as I am logging the commanded AFR (I use high res) PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree...
lol hey but you asked how to do it...thats how...i just told you WHY I dont lol
Old 04-09-2006 | 01:53 PM
  #7  
dynocar's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Thanks foff667, I didn't know how to respond nicely.
Old 04-09-2006 | 02:36 PM
  #8  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Originally Posted by dynocar
Thanks foff667, I didn't know how to respond nicely.
Old 04-09-2006 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by foff667
lol hey but you asked how to do it...thats how...i just told you WHY I dont lol
I was not asking you foff667 I was asking dynocar, sorry for the mixup. I still did not get an answer from him/her but maybe that is because the situation changed behind the question.

Given we (I) do VE/SD tuning in OL and PE is OL why would I want adjust my PE modifier to 1? As I stated above, "As long as I am logging the commanded AFR (I use high res) PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree..." Correct???


Old 04-09-2006 | 03:32 PM
  #10  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Originally Posted by dynocar
Thanks foff667, I didn't know how to respond nicely.
can you take it now dc I'm now not sure how to respond nicely
Old 04-09-2006 | 03:41 PM
  #11  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by foff667
can you take it now dc I'm now not sure how to respond nicely
Then don't say it nicely... Why would I set my PE to 1, given the above example? So much for the forum being a place for the open exchange of information... They are just questions guys calm down....
Old 04-09-2006 | 04:11 PM
  #12  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
I was not asking you foff667
when you say it like this it can come off a bit harsh...i knew you werent asking me but your origonal question was how to turn off pe...he gave you the answer. Then you asked him a question that I would be asking rather then you.
Old 04-09-2006 | 09:03 PM
  #13  
98redorangeta's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: From Ohio now in that state up north
Default

To awnser you question about why to set pe all to 1. It because it will no longer do any thing because its a multiplier and if you multiply or divide some thing buy 1 you get the origanl number there for turning it off.
Old 04-09-2006 | 09:37 PM
  #14  
SideStep's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 98redorangeta
To awnser you question about why to set pe all to 1. It because it will no longer do any thing because its a multiplier and if you multiply or divide some thing buy 1 you get the origanl number there for turning it off.
LOL... one more time...

As long as I am logging the commanded AFR PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree...

I know what the modifier does. I just don't see the reason to reduce the PE to 1, when the scanner knows what the commanded AFR is (modifier OR not) and what the WB AFR is, and compares the two error an %....

Old 04-10-2006 | 05:33 AM
  #15  
ringram's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
Default

I think having a consistent afr is probably a little more accurate as the WB and the engine wont always transition the cells at exactly the same time, when in a constant state sure, but with wide throttle variations or stop start traffic maybe not.
Thats why you should filter out TPS changes etc. But if you want super accurate, then I think running a single AFR over the whole map might be better.
Old 04-10-2006 | 09:36 AM
  #16  
MeentSS02's Avatar
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 3
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Ringram hit the nail on the head IMO. The reason why people would choose to disable PE is because you aren't always gonna be transitioning into it at exactly the same conditions every time.

The reason why I leave PE enabled on my car is because the PCM does some backcalculating of some sort based on the commanded AFR. To give you an example...tune your entire VE table to 13.0:1. Then command stoich (but leave it open loop). It won't quite get there (although it should).

If PE bothers you, just filter it out by making a filter that only displays values for cells where the commanded AFR is above 14.6 or something. I just feel safer with it there to throw in fuel as needed should my foot get heavy.



Quick Reply: How are most disabling PE mode in HPTuner (when SD tuning) ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.