How are most disabling PE mode in HPTuner (when SD tuning) ???
i personally dont...i tune in open loop SD...pe is open loop so in my eyes its all the same...in the end your tuning the ve for a specific # whether that # is 13.0:1 or 14.7:1 the computer shouldnt care.
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by foff667
i personally dont...i tune in open loop SD...pe is open loop so in my eyes its all the same...in the end your tuning the ve for a specific # whether that # is 13.0:1 or 14.7:1 the computer shouldnt care.
Thanks,
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by dynocar
Just set all your PE cells to 1.0
Originally Posted by SideStep
Why would I set them to 1? As long as I am logging the commanded AFR (I use high res) PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree...
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by foff667
lol hey but you asked how to do it...thats how...i just told you WHY I dont lol
Given we (I) do VE/SD tuning in OL and PE is OL why would I want adjust my PE modifier to 1? As I stated above, "As long as I am logging the commanded AFR (I use high res) PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree..." Correct???
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by foff667
can you take it now dc I'm now not sure how to respond nicely 
They are just questions guys calm down....
Originally Posted by SideStep
I was not asking you foff667
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: From Ohio now in that state up north
To awnser you question about why to set pe all to 1. It because it will no longer do any thing because its a multiplier and if you multiply or divide some thing buy 1 you get the origanl number there for turning it off.
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 98redorangeta
To awnser you question about why to set pe all to 1. It because it will no longer do any thing because its a multiplier and if you multiply or divide some thing buy 1 you get the origanl number there for turning it off.
As long as I am logging the commanded AFR PID and my WB, the scanner will report the AFR % error between the two... I don't really care what the PE modifier is as long as the AFR commanded and WB agree...
I know what the modifier does. I just don't see the reason to reduce the PE to 1, when the scanner knows what the commanded AFR is (modifier OR not) and what the WB AFR is, and compares the two error an %....
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
I think having a consistent afr is probably a little more accurate as the WB and the engine wont always transition the cells at exactly the same time, when in a constant state sure, but with wide throttle variations or stop start traffic maybe not.
Thats why you should filter out TPS changes etc. But if you want super accurate, then I think running a single AFR over the whole map might be better.
Thats why you should filter out TPS changes etc. But if you want super accurate, then I think running a single AFR over the whole map might be better.
Ringram hit the nail on the head IMO. The reason why people would choose to disable PE is because you aren't always gonna be transitioning into it at exactly the same conditions every time.
The reason why I leave PE enabled on my car is because the PCM does some backcalculating of some sort based on the commanded AFR. To give you an example...tune your entire VE table to 13.0:1. Then command stoich (but leave it open loop). It won't quite get there (although it should).
If PE bothers you, just filter it out by making a filter that only displays values for cells where the commanded AFR is above 14.6 or something. I just feel safer with it there to throw in fuel as needed should my foot get heavy.
The reason why I leave PE enabled on my car is because the PCM does some backcalculating of some sort based on the commanded AFR. To give you an example...tune your entire VE table to 13.0:1. Then command stoich (but leave it open loop). It won't quite get there (although it should).
If PE bothers you, just filter it out by making a filter that only displays values for cells where the commanded AFR is above 14.6 or something. I just feel safer with it there to throw in fuel as needed should my foot get heavy.
