PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anybody played with leaning things out during cruise for gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2007, 04:23 PM
  #21  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So with me running closed loop can I target 15.1 under engine--fuel control--general--stoich afr? And that would make me run leaner right.. I assume it would also keep my ltfts right.

I would then have to change my pe by the same percent I assume.


Im sure there is a down side right?

Last edited by Tiger2o69; 01-24-2007 at 04:40 PM.
Old 01-24-2007, 04:35 PM
  #22  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is there another table I could make some area's richer w/o the fuel trims adjusting for it?

Last edited by Tiger2o69; 01-24-2007 at 04:41 PM.
Old 01-24-2007, 04:46 PM
  #23  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

I've got mine around 15.0-15.5 A/F ratio in some low load, low rpm situations. MPGs picked up slightly, but not as much as I wanted. I need to spend more time with the wideband and see about going leaner in more cells. I like the option a lot though.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 01-24-2007, 09:22 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,985
Received 56 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

I'm using the pseudo lean cruise via OLSD as well. My MVPI Pro is working better than the serial version of HPT, so I'm spending some more time on the VE tables. But I log my RPM, MAP, ECT, VSS as a baseline to try to find conditions in the chart to translate to the OLFA table.

My idle is between 47-50MAP. Right now I'm commanding a max of 15.5 AFR between 20-45 MAP, and between 176-212 ECT, with the boundaries smoothed in.
Old 03-02-2007, 11:01 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
 
smit2732's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: baton rouge, la
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

closed loop trick???
replace both front NB's with wideband o2's that can simmulate NB o2's. (LC1)

On the inovative lc1(What I use), one of the outputs is set up to simmulate the factory NB o2 sensor. You can adjust the settings to fool the pcm. You will need one for each side.
Normally, when cruising around in closed loop, The pcm regulates the fuel to maintain a 14.7AFR. Your o2 sensors measure the exhaust AFR and feeds a mv signal back to the pcm. The pcm knows that 450mv
from the O2 sensor equals close to 14.7afr. What if you change the programmable output of the wideband sensors? Instead of outputting 450mv at 14.7afr, rescale the LC1 settings to produce 450mv at 16.1afr. something like this:
14.7afr= 410mv instead of 450mv
16.1afr= 450mv instead of 492mv
17.5afr=489mv instead of 535mv

by doing this you fool your pcm. It thinks its regulating 14.7afr because it see's 450mv from each sensor. But, 450mv no longer equals 14.7 instead, 450mv equals 16.1arf and you are now using 10% less fuel.

now you must increase your pe enrichment x rpm table by around 10%
Old 03-02-2007, 02:40 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
wait4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warsaw, in
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Efilive custom os 3, you can command any air fuel ratios at any point in the rpm and kpa. No tricks needed.
Old 03-03-2007, 12:10 AM
  #27  
Rob
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 1,326
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I used to run up to 16.7:1 with the stock cam without any problems. Since doing the cam change, I can't go any higher than 15.5:1 or it will start surging/bucking. So I'm running right at 15.3:1. Helps some but not as much as it used to. I see about 2mpg better than without where as before I could get up to 4mpg better with the stock cam.

I'm doing it via lean cruise since the goat can do it
Old 03-05-2007, 08:22 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
 
onecamaro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey guys, i changed my stoich to 15.5 and drove 3/4 of a tank, and have noticed no side effects. Just did some WOT runs, and it still seems strong. No pinging or knocking.
Old 07-18-2008, 12:13 AM
  #29  
Teching In
 
MSUGTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Weslaco, TX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So after adjusting the values in the Commanded AFR Table, I'd think you would need to go and adjust your Primary VE Table to account for the leaner condition, correct? Bring'n this thread back from the dead!
Old 07-19-2008, 03:18 PM
  #30  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Before worrying about what you command, worry about whether
what you command (including especially, 1.000 EQ closed loop)
is what you get.

The most recent vehicle I worked on, abnormal though it is, was
showing ~ 13:1 by the wideband in closed loop with the O2s
switching all nice and even (to the eye).

Pushing down the O2 switchpoints to 300mV made it run around
14.5 - 15:1 AFR. If I had pushed them down more I could have
gotten "lean closed loop". But this is a supercharged max effort
race toy that happens to be street driven so I wasn't looking to
get anything more than sensible fuel trimming behavior off it.

Get this cleaned up on your setup and see what the wideband
says you obtain on the highway. You may get what you're
looking for. You just need to be sure it doesn't result in kooky
fuel trimming.
Old 07-19-2008, 06:30 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
 
macca_779's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katherine N.T Australia
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wait4me
Efilive custom os 3, you can command any air fuel ratios at any point in the rpm and kpa. No tricks needed.
100% agree Jesse. In Australia we have Lean Cruise available to us but when I use COS3/5 I don't even bother with it as I can just command my lean values in my primary fuelling table. The only real advantage Lean cruise has is that it can be speed enabled.. But in saying that, I've never had any problems doing it in the COS at any speed.
Old 07-19-2008, 10:44 PM
  #32  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Before worrying about what you command, worry about whether
what you command (including especially, 1.000 EQ closed loop)
is what you get.

The most recent vehicle I worked on, abnormal though it is, was
showing ~ 13:1 by the wideband in closed loop with the O2s
switching all nice and even (to the eye).

Pushing down the O2 switchpoints to 300mV made it run around
14.5 - 15:1 AFR. If I had pushed them down more I could have
gotten "lean closed loop". But this is a supercharged max effort
race toy that happens to be street driven so I wasn't looking to
get anything more than sensible fuel trimming behavior off it.

Get this cleaned up on your setup and see what the wideband
says you obtain on the highway. You may get what you're
looking for. You just need to be sure it doesn't result in kooky
fuel trimming.
When I see this behavior, I usually tell the owners to replace the O2s (if they have some mileage on them) and if they do, and the results are the same, then I do some switchpoint work. In more than 2 out 3 cases though, it seems to be the O2s. It's not always though.



Quick Reply: anybody played with leaning things out during cruise for gas mileage?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.