View Poll Results: Would you be interested?
Yes
117
72.22%
No
45
27.78%
Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll
Fixed TA Headlights Coming (thread from Feb 2005)
04-07-2005, 09:22 PM
#61
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
__----__<
-O----O-- =
-O----O-- =
I believe his response was warranted due to other unintelligent people posting things such as above.
Originally Posted by JasonWW
Do you realize you come off as a mean and negative person? You might think about that when sharing your opinions. Sometimes "opinions" can hurt peoples feelings. You need to choose where and when to express yourself and I don't think all these supporters of BLMTA need to be scolded for wanting fixed lights.
04-08-2005, 08:02 AM
#65
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pop-up Headlights
Reasons for:
Pretty
Resons against:
Weight
Weight Distribution
Areodynamics
Unnecessary cost/complexity
I'm not saying "pretty" isn't a valid arguement. It just doesn't do it for me.
Reasons for:
Pretty
Resons against:
Weight
Weight Distribution
Areodynamics
Unnecessary cost/complexity
I'm not saying "pretty" isn't a valid arguement. It just doesn't do it for me.
04-08-2005, 08:39 AM
#66
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HA!
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
FYI Jason, I posted because 1 - that's what a discussion is, a sharing of viewpoints. If everyone is chiming in with a me too, it's an AOL circle jerk. 2 - As we see from Steve, people STILL have this ridiculous notion that they are somehow worse for aero, despite the fact that the only time it matters is during HIGH speed driving, which should only be done during the day and on a track. Going that fast at night is going too fast and you don't deserve the car. You're only going to end up reducing the numbers of a finite resource. On the contrary, they allow for a much sleeker nose, with more room inside. The only way to get exposed lights without a blunt nose is to eat up a lot of space inside setting them way back. And for that matter, a pound or 2 makes no difference one way or another.
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
FYI Jason, I posted because 1 - that's what a discussion is, a sharing of viewpoints. If everyone is chiming in with a me too, it's an AOL circle jerk. 2 - As we see from Steve, people STILL have this ridiculous notion that they are somehow worse for aero, despite the fact that the only time it matters is during HIGH speed driving, which should only be done during the day and on a track. Going that fast at night is going too fast and you don't deserve the car. You're only going to end up reducing the numbers of a finite resource. On the contrary, they allow for a much sleeker nose, with more room inside. The only way to get exposed lights without a blunt nose is to eat up a lot of space inside setting them way back. And for that matter, a pound or 2 makes no difference one way or another.
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
04-08-2005, 09:08 AM
#68
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by InfiniteReality
Cause we actually wanted AGRESSIVE looking cars... A car that not only is fast, but LOOKS 
fast... 
fast... 
04-08-2005, 05:25 PM
#70
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JasonWW
psykoTA, you quoted me, but I don't understand what you are saying. What is that funny looking blob of letters?
04-08-2005, 05:28 PM
#71
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steve2001sh
Pop-up Headlights
Resons against:
Weight
Weight Distribution
Areodynamics
Resons against:
Weight
Weight Distribution
Areodynamics
04-09-2005, 05:19 AM
#73
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HPP
HA!
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
FYI Jason, I posted because 1 - that's what a discussion is, a sharing of viewpoints. If everyone is chiming in with a me too, it's an AOL circle jerk. 2 - As we see from Steve, people STILL have this ridiculous notion that they are somehow worse for aero, despite the fact that the only time it matters is during HIGH speed driving, which should only be done during the day and on a track. Going that fast at night is going too fast and you don't deserve the car. You're only going to end up reducing the numbers of a finite resource. On the contrary, they allow for a much sleeker nose, with more room inside. The only way to get exposed lights without a blunt nose is to eat up a lot of space inside setting them way back. And for that matter, a pound or 2 makes no difference one way or another.
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
FYI Jason, I posted because 1 - that's what a discussion is, a sharing of viewpoints. If everyone is chiming in with a me too, it's an AOL circle jerk. 2 - As we see from Steve, people STILL have this ridiculous notion that they are somehow worse for aero, despite the fact that the only time it matters is during HIGH speed driving, which should only be done during the day and on a track. Going that fast at night is going too fast and you don't deserve the car. You're only going to end up reducing the numbers of a finite resource. On the contrary, they allow for a much sleeker nose, with more room inside. The only way to get exposed lights without a blunt nose is to eat up a lot of space inside setting them way back. And for that matter, a pound or 2 makes no difference one way or another.
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
04-09-2005, 08:51 AM
#74
Originally Posted by EvilTA
I saw fixed headlights on them before. lol
Originally Posted by HPP
HA!
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
I don't agree with the fixed look, so I come off as mean and negative. lol Notice, as Psyko pointed out, who doesn't get called out like that. Whoo-boy. Pure comedy.
Originally Posted by HPP
FYI Jason, I posted because 1 - that's what a discussion is, a sharing of viewpoints. If everyone is chiming in with a me too, it's an AOL circle jerk. Going that fast at night is going too fast and you don't deserve the car.
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
Plus I can't help but wonder why you guys didn't just buy Camaros. :shrug:
Also, not every discussion requires a "Devils Advocate". Some do and help, but others don't. It would make more sense if someone came in here and talked about the legality or other legitimate reasons for not buying this kit, but most of the guys here like the idea. Pretty much all the negative posts have not been about legitimate reasons, instead they have all been opinions about the looks. We all have our opinions, so folks are going to buy whatever they want, whether others think it is ugly or not.
Last edited by JasonWW; 04-10-2005 at 07:02 PM.
04-10-2005, 06:03 PM
#78
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JasonWW
I wasn't being funny, I was just letting Psyko know what he sounded like, in case he didn't realize. Please ignore what I said if you already realize that.
04-10-2005, 07:06 PM
#79
Originally Posted by psykoTA
You quoted HPP, saying what he sounded like. Not me. PM me if you have a problem with something I posted.
