whats the best 1/4 mile time
#2
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002ssmalibu
from a stock 05 GTO? if you not stock please post mods thanx.
#4
TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant get the pig off the line well, and it spins through second, but I pulled a 13.3 @ 105.4 tonight with a 2.1 60' time on street tires. People have been going 12's on DR's with better launches for awhile. I'm not sure I would go so far as to believe 110mph trap speed stock, perhaps that is what speed they are reading their speedo at when they pass the lights, which would be slightly high. Even 108mph traps stock would be pretty freakish except perhaps at sea level on a perfect track with a perfect run and everything else perfect, oh and the stars, sun, moon, planets and entire universe in holy alignment for the first time ever in the history of time. (ok, thats a little overboard but you get the picture) I still say stock 05's can go 12's with traction and a good driver. Tune out the torque managment and tweak fuel/timing and high/mid 12's shouldnt be unusual with good traction. On a side note, it is easy to run very bad times with bad traction and the rubber shifter these things have.
#6
TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueSix
If people could trap 105-106 in stock LS1 gto's then they can trap 108-110 stock with LS2 gto's.
I've also noticed some tracks are in fact slightly down hill which no doubt is a big advantage at that track.
I CAN see 108 being possible on a good run with a better than 2.0 short time. 110 might be pushing it a bit. Becides, some people still think their car is stock with a K&N cold air, headers, cat-back, catless and tuned... ya know, they didnt open up the motor yet so its stock!
Edit: It might not be up to date, but here is the "top 1/4 mile times" for LS2, stock and bolt-ons... Of course those are just people who listed theirs. Mine would be between 7th and 8th place, stock of course. 104-107 seems to be the typical traps, 108-110 clearly is doable but with what mods and under what conditions?
Top NA LS2 ET's - Modified - Bolt Ons / Tune Only:
1) TM2FLI 12.60 @ 110.41 MPH
2) HRJ 12.998 @ 107.59 MPH w/ Nitto DR
3) Jwarren 13.032 @ 106.66 MPH w/ Tune, Nittos, Headers
4) hookmechanic 13.051 @ 108.8 MPH
5) VR42GTO 13.15 @ 107.01 MPH w/ Nitto DR
6) CruznPA 13.259 @ 107.89 MPH
7) Tims05 13.290 @ 104.45 MPH - SLP Catback
8) LS2GTO 13.44 @ 105 MPH
9) wake 13.585 @ 104.34 MPH
10) KrautBurner 13.913 @ 102.20 MPH
Last edited by CSiJason; 10-08-2005 at 04:08 PM.
Trending Topics
#11
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best my stock 04 could put down Friday night at US41 was 103.42MPH @ 13.647, had a horrid reaction though 1.273, and a 2.155 60 foot.
Little more practice, drags & upgrades coming for next year.
Little more practice, drags & upgrades coming for next year.
#12
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wallkill, NY
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04PhantomM6
Best my stock 04 could put down Friday night at US41 was 103.42MPH @ 13.647, had a horrid reaction though 1.273, and a 2.155 60 foot.
Little more practice, drags & upgrades coming for next year.
Little more practice, drags & upgrades coming for next year.
#13
I own a 99 Camaro. And nobody likes the GTO body but me. I think they coulda gone more 'muslce carish' but I just love how it looks and the power. Anyways, I thought GTO's would be faster than me by far. I have a stock Camaro other then the mods listed below and I got a 13.5 @ 103.66 -- Why would I be able to hang with a GTO?
#15
TECH Junkie
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BR1060
I own a 99 Camaro. And nobody likes the GTO body but me. I think they coulda gone more 'muslce carish' but I just love how it looks and the power. Anyways, I thought GTO's would be faster than me by far. I have a stock Camaro other then the mods listed below and I got a 13.5 @ 103.66 -- Why would I be able to hang with a GTO?
#16
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikespeed95
doesnt gto wiegh a bit more than a 4th gen?
id also imagine more traction issues on the gto
id also imagine more traction issues on the gto
#17
TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05's are hampered more by the computers than anything. Torque managment and very agressive IAT retard maps make up for the main reason 05's arent really running any faster than 04's which lack both of the above. A friend around here with an 04 is running drag radials and a custom exhaust and pulled 12.9's at 106 at the track the day after I ran a 13.3 at 105 on street tires. (Of course his 60' was a few tenths quicker which makes all the difference in the world.)
On the subject of 60's, my last car went from high 12's (12.8's) to low 12's (12.3's) by cutting 2 tenths off the 60' times with better tires.
On the subject of 60's, my last car went from high 12's (12.8's) to low 12's (12.3's) by cutting 2 tenths off the 60' times with better tires.
#18
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jenison, MI
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CSiJason
05's are hampered more by the computers than anything. Torque managment and very agressive IAT retard maps make up for the main reason 05's arent really running any faster than 04's which lack both of the above. A friend around here with an 04 is running drag radials and a custom exhaust and pulled 12.9's at 106 at the track the day after I ran a 13.3 at 105 on street tires. (Of course his 60' was a few tenths quicker which makes all the difference in the world.)
On the subject of 60's, my last car went from high 12's (12.8's) to low 12's (12.3's) by cutting 2 tenths off the 60' times with better tires.
On the subject of 60's, my last car went from high 12's (12.8's) to low 12's (12.3's) by cutting 2 tenths off the 60' times with better tires.
#20
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blue Springs, Mo.
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car (04) must be a freak then 4040lb with me in it (275) BFG DR's and a 3" custom cat back best time to date 12.900 at 106.11
Last edited by perdieu; 10-15-2005 at 09:04 PM.