Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Anyone ran the Frankenstein 11 degree LS3 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2018, 02:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
andy-lswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anyone ran the Frankenstein 11 degree LS3 heads?

I seen these on Frankensteins website but can't find any other info on them anywhere else. Would they work with a stock cubed cammed LS3 with a stock bottom end? I wonder how they compare to a set of Frankensteins trick flow 255s or even the Tea version of the 255s
Old 03-11-2018, 10:15 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

No but I bet they’re good
Old 03-11-2018, 11:30 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
andy-lswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
No but I bet they’re good
I'd say they are. I wonder if it's their own aftermarket head or their cnc program worked on another head
Old 03-11-2018, 08:48 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Hmm, the ad shows $2499.99 for "1", is that one pair or one head?
Old 03-11-2018, 09:14 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
andy-lswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S10xGN
Hmm, the ad shows $2499.99 for "1", is that one pair or one head?
I think 1 pair
Old 03-12-2018, 12:05 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Personally.....I would not run aftermarket heads with a stock cam. You will gain virtually nothing!

Now.....if you were gonna stick in a more aggressive cam, then yeah.....I can see that. Particularly if you mill those heads to bump up the compression a bit.

But Aftermarket head with a stock cam? No. Waste of money.....because the stock heads really are that good, ESPECIALLY when mated with a mild stock(ish) cam.

KW
Old 03-12-2018, 12:21 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
Personally.....I would not run aftermarket heads with a stock cam. You will gain virtually nothing!

Now.....if you were gonna stick in a more aggressive cam, then yeah.....I can see that. Particularly if you mill those heads to bump up the compression a bit.

But Aftermarket head with a stock cam? No. Waste of money.....because the stock heads really are that good, ESPECIALLY when mated with a mild stock(ish) cam.

KW
He said Stock cubed, cammed.

That being said there was a test done where they put GMPP ls3 heads on an ls3 with a Stock Cam. It gained around 12-13 hp peak. And actually gained power throughout the test range. I’d imagine theses better aftermarket heads would gain more. 15-20 with the Stock Cam

That being said, yet again, the Cam is by FAR the best bang for the buck with the ls3. There aren’t big gains to be had with intakes and heads on a Stock bottom end ls3 when you’re staying within the Stock rpm range . Up to 10 with an intake and 20-30 with heads MAYBE. It’s not until you increase the rpm range of ls3 stuff to 7500+ that you really start seeing big gains with HCI on an ls3. If you want to stay at 6500 ish rpm, you’re limiting yourself but the Stock top end is damn good stuff for that purpose.
Old 03-12-2018, 02:49 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
andy-lswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
Personally.....I would not run aftermarket heads with a stock cam. You will gain virtually nothing!

Now.....if you were gonna stick in a more aggressive cam, then yeah.....I can see that. Particularly if you mill those heads to bump up the compression a bit.

But Aftermarket head with a stock cam? No. Waste of money.....because the stock heads really are that good, ESPECIALLY when mated with a mild stock(ish) cam.

KW
Not running a stock cam. Stock cubed. Running a cam motion 232/244
Old 03-12-2018, 08:02 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,694
Received 246 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

It's saying a 4.070" minimum bore is required, so you would at least need a .005" hone on the LS3 block or smaller valves.
Old 03-12-2018, 08:22 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by andy-lswon
Not running a stock cam. Stock cubed. Running a cam motion 232/244
Well now......that changes things.

Run the heads but have them milled.

I would SWAG that optimal dynamic compression would be reached with about 11.5:1 static compression using a .040" thick head gasket.

KW
The following users liked this post:
Rich2342 (04-10-2024)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.