ProMod chassis and a stock LS1?
#24
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It put down 735rwhp, not sure how much torque it makes. But yes, 5.7L motor. This car is what made me go ahead and do the th400 swap, it was slow just like mine..... even trapped the same when he still had the t56 in it. He ET'd better only because he's got a dana, 10.80 before the swap.
#27
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
wow! I like the stainless v band exhaust. I wonder where they are measuring the turbine at ? I have a feeling its at the inducer. I wish they would give full turbine/compressor wheel specs instead of throwing one number from each at us. They have an 80mm also. Its got a "96mm" turbine with the stainless v band too. Thst sounds like a borg copy , 96/88.
#28
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I’d bet it’s similar to the precision 103mm wheel, which is the exducer.
Diameter measurements are goofy too. Since a billet “80mm” can have 2-3mm of extra blade length stretching towards the hub. So is their 94mm billet version an exact clone of their cast unit? Or is the blade length longer as is the case with all these performance “class legal” turbos with tiny hubs and longer blades. IF the dimensions are the same, no advantage to go with billet that I’m aware of.
Diameter measurements are goofy too. Since a billet “80mm” can have 2-3mm of extra blade length stretching towards the hub. So is their 94mm billet version an exact clone of their cast unit? Or is the blade length longer as is the case with all these performance “class legal” turbos with tiny hubs and longer blades. IF the dimensions are the same, no advantage to go with billet that I’m aware of.
#29
Restricted User
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been trying very hard to not start a build around one of these. I have 4 of my own cars to finish this year already.
#30
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I’m worried trump tax is gonna jack the china turbo price way up. Tempted to buy one just to have as a spare. Figure if they aren’t ticking time bombs, resale shouldn’t be a big issue anyway. Foot print looks smaller than a typical S400 T6 frame. Wondering if it would drop right in place…
#34
Restricted User
#35
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea, my gt45 is a little bit smaller than the s475. I would just like to see some side by sides to see how big a difference the on3 version of the "big frame" turbos would be.Isnt their 88/83 suppose to be s rough copy of the PT88 ? Im sure the Precision version is probably noticably larger than the on3 88. Just courious about how much more realestate that 94mm would demand.
#36
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well i was bored so with some common sense detective work (i checked the website) it says the intake is 5 inchs and the outlet is 3 so i did some measurments on the pictures i found did the ratio thing and compared to my s480s and it is pretty close compressor side wise. The turbine side is a mystery cause i couldnt find a direct or even close to direct on picture of it.
#37
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All that only works if the intake is really 5 inchs. Which i rounded up to 5.5 cause if the inside diameter is 5 then with the lip on eaxh side it should be around 5.5. The picture thing isnt exact but it should be within .5 inchs or so.
#38