Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LQ4 Stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:56 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
hookemdevils22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,411
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default LQ4 Stroker

I'm contemplating stroking to 408 my 6.0L LQ4, and just looking for some general advice. It's mainly a street car, with some autocross thrown in.

Current engine specs as follows:
  • LS3 top end (42 lb injectors)
  • As-cast L92 heads milled to 66 cc's
  • 4.030" bore
  • Stock crankshaft (3.622" stroke)
  • Mahle LS3 pistons, 4 cc valve reliefs 1.314" compression height
  • Pistons .005" above deck at TDC
  • Scat Pro series 6.125" I-beam rods
  • LG G6X3 cam (23x/24x @ .050”, 64x/.61x, 111 LSA)
  • Comp 921 springs
  • Stock rockers
  • 7.400" Comp pushrods
  • GM 4.080" x .051" head gaskets
  • 1 7/8" american racing long tubes with 3" Pypes exhaust

I've calculated static CR at 10.46:1, which would jump to just under 11.5:1 if I were to keep everything and increase stroke to 4.000". Increasing gasket thickness to .060" drops that to 11.26:1, which a little better. Access to 93 octane is few and far between where I'm at, so I want to keep CR in check a bit.

Last edited by hookemdevils22; 04-10-2018 at 09:31 PM.
Old 04-10-2018, 08:10 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Since I don't see an actual question I'll just go ahead and mention that I'm running 11.5:1 compression on 93 octane. Even on 93 i'm running reduced timing to prevent knock. Its not much bit it is a few degrees. I can't imagine running any less octane with this compression
Old 04-10-2018, 09:30 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
hookemdevils22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,411
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I’m looking for comments on stroking what I currently have, specifically the CR and perhaps cam. From the sound of it, I’ll want to decrease CR a bit.

I reached out to LG with regard to the G6X3 on a stroker, we’ll see what they say.
Old 04-11-2018, 06:26 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Increasing gasket thickness is not a great way to lower compression due to low octane. Quench needs to be around .040” so less milling of the heads is preferred
Shoot for 11.0:1. And your mid 230s IN cam will work nicely
Old 04-11-2018, 06:43 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Have you considered a 3.90 stroke? That's what I'm doing, makes it a 398" (@4.030 bore).
Won't pull the skirts as far out the bore.
Old 04-11-2018, 08:52 AM
  #6  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Since you can’t reuse the pistons for the 4” stroke, have you considered a different dish volume?
Old 04-11-2018, 11:20 AM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Forged 4.00" Crankshaft 1850 BW

Hi Hookem, I can supply a 4.00" Forged Crankshaft with 1850 BW. (Scat Plant)

The CHOICE of a RaceTech piston is another item I cam supply.

What are your Rod Weights B/S ?

CORRECT engineering could save costs with respect to engine balance costs.

Your 11.5 CR will be fine as you have REDUCED the R/L, good for knock resistance.

Lance
Old 04-11-2018, 11:51 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
95wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 495
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Have you dyno'd your current combo....If so could you post a graph?
Just curious what it did with LQ4/L92 and LG cam
Old 04-11-2018, 11:51 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
hookemdevils22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,411
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Since you can’t reuse the pistons for the 4” stroke, have you considered a different dish volume?
You're right, and that's something I didn't even consider, that my CH is too high. That would be a great idea.

Pantera, I don't have rod weights on me, but should have them in my folder at home.

ETA
It put down 414/373 through a 4L80e.
Old 04-11-2018, 12:07 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
95wannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 495
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

ok thanks. I have a similar combo, but my smaller EPS cam peaks a bit lower. Food for thought if AX is on your mind.
Old 04-11-2018, 12:11 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
hookemdevils22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,411
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

yeah, big cam and big exhausts hurt it down low. the T56 keeps it fun, but I'm exploring ways to add to what I have. another guy I know ran an LY6 with a smaller cam, 1 3/4" headers and 2 1/2" exhaust, which made 414/400 but with a nice plateau of a torque curve.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.