Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another destroked ls3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2017, 01:15 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gtslo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Another destroked ls3

Alright if your another diehard stroker fan, please move along. Especially if your aunts cousins brothers son n laws uncle built a destroked Ls and didn't like it. If you have built one yourself I would like to hear feedback.
i recently built a all forged ls1 stroker with all the goodies Cnc heads arp all throughout. Built for nitrous. It just didn't cut the mustard. So I bought a Texas speed 6.0 iron block bored to 4.065 sonic tested ok. With it I bought mahle L92105065P25 pistons -25 cc compression height 1.105 as a package deal for $1400 (pistons alone were 1100) which was a score imo because everything was new. Now I'm going with an lr4 crank and the hard part was finding the correct rods. I'm pasting my notes from last night. Give me your opinion please


L92105065P25
Mahly pistons are suppose to have a 4.000" crank
With a 6.125" rod which produces a 416" 4.065 bore

We are using a 3.268"crank

So the difference between a 4" and 3.268" is .732 (difference in diameter)
Take .732 and divide by two to get your radius difference
Which is .366"

I believe radius is the main difference we are looking for when trying to configure the correct rod size.

So take a 6.125" rod and add .366 to get your new rod length
Which is 6.491

Tall deck LS engines have a rod that is 6.460 which would have the correct "on center" wrist pin, rod journals as well as main journals. This leaves the piston .031 in the bore. Possibly mill the block .030 and check for clearances. Ask Clark about mls head gasket thickness for correct/safe crush thickness. Also ask about material expansion to see if a longer rod will expand with heat as piston rings do.

Compression height is from center of wrist pin to top of the piston. These pistons are 1.105. The eagle rods crs6460O3DL19 are 6.460 the LR4 crank being 3.268 has a radius of 1.634 all totaling to show at TDC to be 9.199
Block deck height is advertised as 9.240
9.240-9.199=.041
Let's check with a kit with same pistons
1.105+2.000"+6.125"=9.23
9.240-9.23=.01 clearance.
With 6.460 rods the clearance would be .041 mill .030 leaving .011 clearance slightly decreasing static compression by ~10%?
Old 01-07-2017, 02:07 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Senna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 166
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here is how i see it

Stroke 3.268 / 2 = 1.634
rod length 6.300
piston comp height 1.304

total 9.238


These are common size rods and pistons that would give you options on valve reliefs or dish.
Old 01-07-2017, 03:02 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Yeah, destroying will never work, lol
Old 01-07-2017, 05:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Go for it, man! I love destroked hi rpm engines. Dare to be different.
Old 01-07-2017, 05:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
8.Lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PNW
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The LS is a metric engine, you really should be using 83mm(4.8 crank) and 92mm(your crank) for your calculations.
Old 01-07-2017, 05:29 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I would love to see the results. I have an extra gen 4 4.8 crank and rods and if my turbo ly6 ever bends a rod I plan to swap to the 4.8 crank and rods.
Old 01-07-2017, 05:54 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gtslo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slogo
Yeah, destroying will never work, lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52pNnE_jN3U
are you being sarcastic? I think so lol because that N/A went 504 hp.
Old 01-07-2017, 06:00 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gtslo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senna
Here is how i see it

Stroke 3.268 / 2 = 1.634
rod length 6.300
piston comp height 1.304

total 9.238


These are common size rods and pistons that would give you options on valve reliefs or dish.
so your saying throw away a $1000 set of pistons so I can go with a different set of pistons and rods? Is there any geometry behind that? I can order a $590 set of 6.460" rods and have the block milled .030 for less $. If there is any geometrical/durability reason to support your idea I am all ears but I couldn't justify doing that just to go with more common parts. This engine will see 18-20 psi btw
Old 01-07-2017, 07:02 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gtslo04
are you being sarcastic? I think so lol because that N/A went 504 hp.
Yes, I was being Sarcastic, you didn't see the grin on my face.
And it was 540 not 504. I am a fan of big bore short stroke myself.
Seems like there has been debate on ls1tech before about what you are
contemplating, so i thought I would throw that video on here for the fun
of it. Good luck with the build, keep us posted on the build, would love to
see results.
Old 01-07-2017, 07:05 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Senna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 166
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gtslo04
so your saying throw away a $1000 set of pistons so I can go with a different set of pistons and rods? Is there any geometry behind that? I can order a $590 set of 6.460" rods and have the block milled .030 for less $. If there is any geometrical/durability reason to support your idea I am all ears but I couldn't justify doing that just to go with more common parts. This engine will see 18-20 psi btw
I'm not a fan of decking the block that far. Limits it's possible future uses. Same with 6.460 rods, limited applications.

It would have been cheaper the way I suggested and not having to deck the block.

P.S. you would'nt have throw the other pistons away, it's possible tp sell theme.
Old 01-07-2017, 10:20 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Gt=alms

HI GT, yes I agree most here know LITTLE about PROFESSIONAL Racing.
I acquire my 3.268" crankshafts from David @ Marine Crankshaft, my neighbor.
He's a Kiwi, thus TOP quality Billets.

Your CASE, I would replace the piston, a Racetec 2618.

I will provide a good cost for the EXHATCH piston, I would hope to provide a NPR STEEL ring set.

I would NOT "deck" the block as few intakes will then fit.

The ALMS engine "spec" is COMMON, the chance to fine some "take-out" parts could also be possible.

Lance
Old 01-08-2017, 05:01 PM
  #12  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gtslo04
So I bought a Texas speed 6.0 iron block bored to 4.065 sonic tested ok.
What do you mean tested ok? What was the minimum wall thickness?
Old 01-19-2017, 04:25 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gtslo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
What do you mean tested ok? What was the minimum wall thickness?
I'm honestly not sure what it tested out to be. It's just what I was told. Now that I think about it that's putting a lot of faith in someone that they speak the truth.
Old 01-19-2017, 08:22 AM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gtslo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good morning everyone!!

hope everyone got a goodnights rest, I have been searching all night for something that will maybe... just maybe.. work! And I found it!! First I just googled 6.500" rod android came up to some forged rods for an old MG 4 cyl. Then right below it.. Howard's cams!!!!! Sbc large journal!!!!! Br6500 is the part number I'll post pics if I can figure out how comparing the ls1 style am for the sbc. If I remember right, when people were first modding ls1's (Jesus I was a kid) they were using 6.125" sbc rods before the aftermarket dedicated ls Rod was made. I remember my stepdad used a set and ran them for over 5 years before selling the car. (They were lightweight titanium and he wasn't about to throw them away) anywho... yeah only difference is a small offset on the pin I believe and the big end had a different size bearing but hey the big end bore Ian the same. Pin side width is .060 wider but what could that hurt? So the math side... 1.634(radius of stroke)+1.105 (comp height)+6.500(rods) 9.239.

Now as as for the lr4 crankshaft I'm finding that there are mixed answers for the stroke I'm seeing 3.268 and 3.270.. anybody know if this is a difference in year or if maybe it was a very used crank they mic'd?.?.
Old 03-14-2017, 11:59 AM
  #15  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
North*power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston Ma
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Updates?

Destroked LS's are awesome, hoping you've made some headway with the project.
Old 04-15-2017, 12:52 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
heykw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slogo
Yeah, destroying will never work, lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52pNnE_jN3U
I would like to see the dyno sheet on this build and a cost breakdown.
Old 06-27-2024, 06:45 PM
  #17  
Teching In
 
Peri00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Destroke lq9

Originally Posted by Gtslo04
Alright if your another diehard stroker fan, please move along. Especially if your aunts cousins brothers son n laws uncle built a destroked Ls and didn't like it. If you have built one yourself I would like to hear feedback.
i recently built a all forged ls1 stroker with all the goodies Cnc heads arp all throughout. Built for nitrous. It just didn't cut the mustard. So I bought a Texas speed 6.0 iron block bored to 4.065 sonic tested ok. With it I bought mahle L92105065P25 pistons -25 cc compression height 1.105 as a package deal for $1400 (pistons alone were 1100) which was a score imo because everything was new. Now I'm going with an lr4 crank and the hard part was finding the correct rods. I'm pasting my notes from last night. Give me your opinion please


L92105065P25
Mahly pistons are suppose to have a 4.000" crank
With a 6.125" rod which produces a 416" 4.065 bore

We are using a 3.268"crank

So the difference between a 4" and 3.268" is .732 (difference in diameter)
Take .732 and divide by two to get your radius difference
Which is .366"

I believe radius is the main difference we are looking for when trying to configure the correct rod size.

So take a 6.125" rod and add .366 to get your new rod length
Which is 6.491

Tall deck LS engines have a rod that is 6.460 which would have the correct "on center" wrist pin, rod journals as well as main journals. This leaves the piston .031 in the bore. Possibly mill the block .030 and check for clearances. Ask Clark about mls head gasket thickness for correct/safe crush thickness. Also ask about material expansion to see if a longer rod will expand with heat as piston rings do.

Compression height is from center of wrist pin to top of the piston. These pistons are 1.105. The eagle rods crs6460O3DL19 are 6.460 the LR4 crank being 3.268 has a radius of 1.634 all totaling to show at TDC to be 9.199
Block deck height is advertised as 9.240
9.240-9.199=.041
Let's check with a kit with same pistons
1.105+2.000"+6.125"=9.23
9.240-9.23=.01 clearance.
With 6.460 rods the clearance would be .041 mill .030 leaving .011 clearance slightly decreasing static compression by ~10%?
destroke lq9


if I use the 4.8l crank and rods, with factory lq9 pistons and ls3 heads.. how much do I deck the lq9 block?
Old 06-27-2024, 09:25 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,124
Received 3,109 Likes on 2,424 Posts
Default

Why would you deck the block??
Old 06-28-2024, 02:22 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
Peri00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Reply

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Why would you deck the block??
Im on a budget
To boost compression and to make sure the pistons is not to far in the cylinder upon tdc..
Old 06-28-2024, 08:16 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,124
Received 3,109 Likes on 2,424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peri00
Im on a budget
To boost compression and to make sure the pistons is not to far in the cylinder upon tdc..
LS engine pistons tend to come ABOVE the deck a few thousandths.
Mill the heads, not the block
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (06-29-2024)



Quick Reply: Another destroked ls3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.