Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lq4 build HELP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2019, 01:30 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Lq4 build HELP

Ok so here it is .... I have some ported 317heads ,ls9 gaskets,LS7 lifters,ls2 timing chain,Ported NNBS Intake manifold,102 throttle body, 6.100 compstar rods and a cam that reads this

will these pistons "Wiseco Forged Pistons 6.0 4.005 Bore 3.622 Stroke +3.20cc flat top K398X05" work for this set up? Planning on running on e85...thank you in advance.

By the way did the compression calculator and it shows I'll be at 9.54:1

Last edited by MAG1C; 07-01-2019 at 10:38 AM.
Old 06-30-2019, 06:28 PM
  #2  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,369 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

What part number rod do you have? Your pistons are designed for a 6.098” rod length, although .002” longer rods (6.100”) won’t affect much as long as you measure your out of hole dimensions correctly, allowing for piston rock of course. Those same pistons have a .927” pin diameter, which is why I asked what part number rod you purchased. Most Compstars rods are set up on the small end for a .943” pin. Biggest dilemma these days is matching rod pin diameter to piston pin diameter for the LS stuff.
Old 07-01-2019, 05:13 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Part# Csc6100ds2a2ah
Old 07-01-2019, 04:51 PM
  #4  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,369 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MAG1C
Part# Csc6100ds2a2ah
Those rods have a .928” pin bushing, so you should be fine. Keep in mind your compression height is a tad tall, which pushes the top ring toward the chamber a bit, but set up properly, I think you’ll be ok. Do your due diligence during mock up and check ptv as well as quench. You running this N/A?
Old 07-02-2019, 06:44 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Those rods have a .928” pin bushing, so you should be fine. Keep in mind your compression height is a tad tall, which pushes the top ring toward the chamber a bit, but set up properly, I think you’ll be ok. Do your due diligence during mock up and check ptv as well as quench. You running this N/A?
Well I wanted to do a 370 boost motor at first but then got all these parts on a deal and well a buddy told me he had these piston . That he never used and would let them go for 500 . So now idk what to do . And as for the cam . I dont think it's a boost friendly cam. Tried looking for it on line and no luck. By the way thank you for taking time and replying to me.
Old 07-07-2019, 07:29 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bump....
Old 07-07-2019, 07:40 PM
  #7  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Just a WAG, but I bet that was spec'd by Martin Smallwood of Smallwood Racing Development (SRD). The numbers on the back look like duration and then lobe lift, so possibly 248/264 duration with .365"/.355" lobe lift and a 114LSA with 4 degrees advance built in. It's not ideal for a boosted engine IMO.
Old 07-11-2019, 03:44 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
1988montecarloss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: maine
Posts: 667
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

If that is the duration at .050” on that cam then it’s way too much for that compression ratio
Old 07-14-2019, 08:27 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Just a WAG, but I bet that was spec'd by Martin Smallwood of Smallwood Racing Development (SRD). The numbers on the back look like duration and then lobe lift, so possibly 248/264 duration with .365"/.355" lobe lift and a 114LSA with 4 degrees advance built in. It's not ideal for a boosted engine IMO.
Yeah i figured will it still work on a n/a set up?
Old 07-14-2019, 08:28 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1988montecarloss
If that is the duration at .050” on that cam then it’s way too much for that compression ratio
What compression would i need for this cam?
Old 07-14-2019, 09:32 AM
  #11  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MAG1C
Yeah i figured will it still work on a n/a set up?
It would work but not very well. It has a very late IVC event so It would want to make power at a higher RPM than what your intake will support. It also has a pretty significant amount of overlap for a 6.0L so it would sound pretty rowdy, but again, it won't be helping you much with the setup you have. Basically the engine would be all bark, and no bite.
Old 07-16-2019, 01:54 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
It would work but not very well. It has a very late IVC event so It would want to make power at a higher RPM than what your intake will support. It also has a pretty significant amount of overlap for a 6.0L so it would sound pretty rowdy, but again, it won't be helping you much with the setup you have. Basically the engine would be all bark, and no bite.
You think it will be better on a 408 stroker 10.1 compression
Old 07-18-2019, 12:29 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

To the top
Old 07-18-2019, 06:39 AM
  #14  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,369 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MAG1C
You think it will be better on a 408 stroker 10.1 compression
Better? Yes. Trying to build an engine around a camshaft is tough to do. It works out better having a camshaft built for the application, not the other way around. You are gonna run E85, so I’d go at least 12 on compression, maybe 13 or 14. Lots of guys run 14:1 on E85, but your camshaft designer needs to know exactly what your doing with compression.
Old 07-20-2019, 12:58 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MAG1C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Better? Yes. Trying to build an engine around a camshaft is tough to do. It works out better having a camshaft built for the application, not the other way around. You are gonna run E85, so I’d go at least 12 on compression, maybe 13 or 14. Lots of guys run 14:1 on E85, but your camshaft designer needs to know exactly what your doing with compression.
Ok thanks yeah i got a 408 on my truck thats getting rebuilt. And i lost the cam sheet of the cam So i idk what size it is .
Old 07-26-2019, 12:44 AM
  #16  
Teching In
 
PGE_Von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Cheraw,SC
Posts: 3
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Piston and rod HELP

Can’t seem to find any rod that will work with a .945 pin piston. Was wondering if I could by any chance just make the switch to a .927 pin piston with no drawbacks? Engine is a 2003 6.0 LQ4.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.