Special Edition Vehicles Firehawk | SS | WS6 | Berger | Blackbird | Comp T/A

Any 3rd gen Firehawks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:28 PM
  #1  
Josh_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default Any 3rd gen Firehawks?

This is what someone on another forum said...

"No way dude.
1st gen > all others. Not the best handling, but who cares when it looks like that!
And L98s were mid 14 sec, while the 3rd gen Firehawks were the fastest f-bodys of any year. 375hp and 3100lbs. Nice.... "

And I thought the turbo v6 GTA's were the fastest of the 3rd gen models
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:32 PM
  #2  
flyin red TA's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Barbaria
Default

I thought the turbo TAs were the fastest too...and if they weren't, they could be for about $10.
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:36 PM
  #3  
Spazdout's Avatar
Ginger Hater
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tx
Default

yes, there were 25 produced, the Turbo Trans Am (TTA) is not reffered to as a GTA, even though it has the same body kit and all that, its just not reffered to it like that.
according to firebirdgallery.com they were the fastest pontiac built. i know it was a formula when it left the factory but was sent to SLP.

Old 04-19-2006 | 11:37 PM
  #4  
Josh_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Heres a link. http://www.northcarolinagasprices.co...6418&page_no=1

On that site you read from the top. I know, its backwards.
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
BizZzatch350's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 12
From: T E X A S
Default

They did not weight 3100lbs and they ran 13.6s stock, LS1s have gone 12s stock. They have a cool intake though.
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:41 PM
  #6  
CrabhartLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

what the **** is he talking about?

besides, firehawks first year was 1997. There was 1 LT1 year. 2002 was the 5th anniversary. what an imbecile.

And why do people keep calling the 1st gen the best year? It's like those people saying the new LS2 GTO's have nothing on the 64's and Judges. Come on, they ran high 14s and handled like a garbage truck. Man these blind old muscle followers are lame. They need to get back into their stock 4 banger lowered S-10s and drive them off a cliff.

Ok i'm done.
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:45 PM
  #7  
Josh_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Trust me, most of those people up there dont know **** about cars! I try to set them strait sometimes. When he mentioned the Firehawks as a 3rd gen f-body, I was like... "HUH?!"
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:48 PM
  #8  
DrEvyl's Avatar
teh PuRpL3z

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 4
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
what the **** is he talking about?

besides, firehawks first year was 1997. There was 1 LT1 year. 2002 was the 5th anniversary. what an imbecile.

And why do people keep calling the 1st gen the best year? It's like those people saying the new LS2 GTO's have nothing on the 64's and Judges. Come on, they ran high 14s and handled like a garbage truck. Man these blind old muscle followers are lame. They need to get back into their stock 4 banger lowered S-10s and drive them off a cliff.

Ok i'm done.
Firehawk's first year was 1991, dude. You guys are the ones that don't know what's up.







It was basically a race prepped 3rd gen.

Last edited by DrEvyl; 04-19-2006 at 11:54 PM.
Old 04-19-2006 | 11:53 PM
  #9  
Zepher's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Default

The 91/92 Firehawk with the Comp R package is the best F-Body ever (I am probably biased since I own a 3rd gen).

I've had plenty of people mistake my 88 formula for a Firehawk many times.

And it's hard to judge the 1/4 mile times since the owners or past owners of the Hawks probably didn't drive the car as well or as hard as the next guy.

I figure that they should run in the 12's since I've gotten my friends 82 Trans Am with a bolt on LT1 that dyno'd 288rwhp to a 13.4@106 with a 2.0 60' on street tires at street pressure.
Old 04-20-2006 | 12:16 AM
  #10  
CrabhartLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by DrEvyl
Firehawk's first year was 1991, dude. You guys are the ones that don't know what's up.
hmm. well ****.
Old 04-20-2006 | 12:21 AM
  #11  
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
what the **** is he talking about?

besides, firehawks first year was 1997. There was 1 LT1 year. 2002 was the 5th anniversary. what an imbecile.

And why do people keep calling the 1st gen the best year? It's like those people saying the new LS2 GTO's have nothing on the 64's and Judges. Come on, they ran high 14s and handled like a garbage truck. Man these blind old muscle followers are lame. They need to get back into their stock 4 banger lowered S-10s and drive them off a cliff.

Ok i'm done.
old school muscle was meant to go strait. in their day they did handle well.
Old 04-20-2006 | 12:37 AM
  #12  
Josh_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
hmm. well ****.
I know I felt kinda stupid too
Old 04-20-2006 | 12:47 AM
  #13  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

A properly driven firehawk should run a 12. They're faster than the TTAs in stock form, iirc.

I could be completely wrong since it's been awhile..
Old 04-20-2006 | 12:53 AM
  #14  
flyin red TA's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Barbaria
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
hmm. well ****.
Yep he got ya. The firehawk was the coolest 3rd gen ever made, in my opinion. You'll probably never see one in person, though.
Old 04-20-2006 | 01:01 AM
  #15  
MYTFASTSS's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Ca
Default

I remember them back when I had my 89 L98 TPI. I don't remember the exact Hp figures, But I thought i saw 315/320HP........anyways, they only made 25????
Old 04-20-2006 | 01:03 AM
  #16  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

yep, only 25
Old 04-20-2006 | 01:04 AM
  #17  
DrEvyl's Avatar
teh PuRpL3z

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 4
From: Seattle, WA
Default

That green Firehawk up there is the only one they made in that color... most of them were red. And they made 1 convertible, too.
Old 04-20-2006 | 01:21 AM
  #18  
MYTFASTSS's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Ca
Default

Dayamm, Only 25!! Why was that? How much did they cost? FYI, I bought my 89 formula350 from a local dealer back in 92 and remember seeing them in a Brochure or One of the many Car mag's I had collected. I personally didn't like the look of the wheels, but everything else was nice. Now, I miss my TPI, damm, that thing was torquey down low
Old 04-20-2006 | 05:04 AM
  #19  
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Default

I saw a 3rdGen Firehawk for sale at Burns Pontiac in NJ back in the day. I want to say the window sticker was around $30K... It was only there for a few weeks, so I don't know if it was sold or sent to another dealer.
Old 04-20-2006 | 09:26 AM
  #20  
jmm98LS1's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 3
From: KS
Default

I could be wrong, but I thought I read awhile back that the sticker for a the 3rd gen hawk was about the same as a corvette.


Quick Reply: Any 3rd gen Firehawks?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.