99 ss vs 99-04 mach1
08-17-2009, 03:32 PM
#81
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-17-2009, 03:44 PM
#83
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) I'm certainly not the only one that finds you arrogant.
2) A humble person doesn't need to 'brag'.
3) Backing up arrogance is not an eliminator of arrogance.
4) Plenty of people have as many cars as you, adn just as pricey, and dont' feel the need to 'boast'.
5) I've earned everything I've owned.....all while having a child when I was 17.
6) I'm hardly jealous as I'd rather be lower on the income totum pole and be a realistic humble person, than be 'higher up' with a matching level of arrogance.
7) funny.......you don't know a single thing abotu my life, yet you can call it pathetic.
08-17-2009, 04:18 PM
#86
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-17-2009, 04:37 PM
#87
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
say what you guys want but
Stock A4 LS1 is a good race for a 5 speed mach
Stock M6 LS1 WILL win by 1-2 cars, seen it, done it about 20 times now
2002 A4 Z28: 3.73's vs 2003 Mach 1 5 Speed: X-Pipe, Tune
its an auto ls1 and its pulling on a 5 speed mach so imagine what a 6 Speed ls1 would do???hmmmm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS8vpGHMZBM
Full exhaust A4 Z28 vs Full Exhaust CAI, Tune Auto Mach 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1Fk7VJO6g
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...s-1_133677.htm
Stock A4 LS1 is a good race for a 5 speed mach
Stock M6 LS1 WILL win by 1-2 cars, seen it, done it about 20 times now
2002 A4 Z28: 3.73's vs 2003 Mach 1 5 Speed: X-Pipe, Tune
its an auto ls1 and its pulling on a 5 speed mach so imagine what a 6 Speed ls1 would do???hmmmm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS8vpGHMZBM
Full exhaust A4 Z28 vs Full Exhaust CAI, Tune Auto Mach 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1Fk7VJO6g
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...s-1_133677.htm
Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 08-17-2009 at 05:06 PM.
08-17-2009, 04:57 PM
#88
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) I'm certainly not the only one that finds you arrogant.
2) A humble person doesn't need to 'brag'.
3) Backing up arrogance is not an eliminator of arrogance.
4) Plenty of people have as many cars as you, adn just as pricey, and dont' feel the need to 'boast'.
5) I've earned everything I've owned.....all while having a child when I was 17.
6) I'm hardly jealous as I'd rather be lower on the income totum pole and be a realistic humble person, than be 'higher up' with a matching level of arrogance.
7) funny.......you don't know a single thing abotu my life, yet you can call it pathetic.
08-17-2009, 04:59 PM
#89
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
say what you guys want but
Stock A4 LS1 is a good race for a 5 speed mach
Stock M6 LS1 WILL win by 1-2 cars, seen it, done it about 20 times now
2002 A4 Z28: 3.73's vs 2003 Mach 1 5 Speed: X-Pipe, Tune
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS8vpGHMZBM
its an auto ls1 and its pulling on a 5 speed mach so imagine what a 6 Speed ls1 would do???hmmmm
Stock A4 LS1 is a good race for a 5 speed mach
Stock M6 LS1 WILL win by 1-2 cars, seen it, done it about 20 times now
2002 A4 Z28: 3.73's vs 2003 Mach 1 5 Speed: X-Pipe, Tune
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS8vpGHMZBM
its an auto ls1 and its pulling on a 5 speed mach so imagine what a 6 Speed ls1 would do???hmmmm
08-17-2009, 05:13 PM
#90
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no what sums it up is when my A4 WS6 (the black one) was stock i beat about 6 or 7 5 speed mach 1's by anywhere from a fender to a whole car, i never lost to one and have never seen a bone stock LS1 loose to one in my street racing days and there are about 3-4 bolt on ones that come out with us every time, my white ws6 which is a 6-Speed when it was bone stock beat a bone stock mach 1 5 speed by 2.5 cars from a roll and about 2 cars from a dig ...i dont see how thats a drivers race...bottom line is
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 08-17-2009 at 05:18 PM.
08-17-2009, 05:30 PM
#91
dude you have to be the funniest guy i know.
and i don't agree that an m6 ls1 will always win...many of the a4 ls1's i've seen were trapping higher than a lot of the m6's anyway...seems they all run a bit differently
btw, i never saw the ls1 pull in the first vid
and i don't agree that an m6 ls1 will always win...many of the a4 ls1's i've seen were trapping higher than a lot of the m6's anyway...seems they all run a bit differently
btw, i never saw the ls1 pull in the first vid
Last edited by mrbigjeep; 08-17-2009 at 05:35 PM.
08-17-2009, 05:36 PM
#92
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no what sums it up is when my A4 WS6 (the black one) was stock i beat about 6 or 7 5 speed mach 1's by anywhere from a fender to a whole car, i never lost to one and have never seen a bone stock LS1 loose to one in my street racing days and there are about 3-4 bolt on ones that come out with us every time, my white ws6 which is a 6-Speed when it was bone stock beat a bone stock mach 1 5 speed by 2.5 cars from a roll and about 2 cars from a dig ...i dont see how thats a drivers race...bottom line is
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
08-17-2009, 05:54 PM
#94
10 Second Club
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Royal Palm Beach FL.
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=ARCTIC '00;12084335]And the car. The day I purchased it from Mercedez-Benz of Sacramento (now Von Housen MB) for $72,000 large but well worth it IMO! Rest assured it will be a 10-second Benz in the near future and I promise that.
I gotta say it is lighter than it looks, I am far from finished with my Mach. I just finished my built shortblock and it if just waiting for a few more funds till goes in. With a slightly more aggressive tune I would be solidly in the 10's now, but I am trying to nurse the 85000 mile stock shortblock until everything comes together for my motor swap. Just so you know the car went 11.2 with a stock shotblock, stock exhaust manifolds, stock cams, stock heads which have never been off the motor. The timing is pulled way back, car actually put over 500 to the rear wheels on just 11lbs of boost through an unlocked stalled auto. I don't advertise that cause I think its rice to say you have more hp from a tune thats not currently in the motor. You may not like the 4.6 but the potential is enormous. It WILL be a 9 second ac'd street car within the next year.
Thats great for a luxury car, if he gets his mods done quick he may own my car for a couple of months but mine will eventually be faster. Fact is we couldn't live farther away so it looks like this bench racing is as good as it is gonna get.
You got that right Mike, but like I said before I think he's just stirring the pot to see what reaction he gets from us.
Dude you sound like freaking Obama quoteing stats on how many new jobs were created last month. The answer to both of these questions
1) Question: how many new jobs were created last month?
Answer: Who the hell knows, no way to quantify that.
2) Question: how many stock Machs have gotton beat by stock LS1's since 2003?
Answer: Who the hell knows? no way to quantify that
Why don't you take your little narrow minded *** and your little (LS1>Mach) chart and go to the Mach 1 registry and check the quarter mile section for stock Machs and see that a great deal of them went low 13's bone stock. Since LS1's stock are low 13 second cars it is a DRIVERS RACE. And the idiotic argument that LS1's trap higher means nothing to any real racer. Who cares what your car traps if you loose? Yes M6 LS1's are faster than auto Machs+ common knowledge. Thats why mine is not stock anymore.
I gotta say it is lighter than it looks, I am far from finished with my Mach. I just finished my built shortblock and it if just waiting for a few more funds till goes in. With a slightly more aggressive tune I would be solidly in the 10's now, but I am trying to nurse the 85000 mile stock shortblock until everything comes together for my motor swap. Just so you know the car went 11.2 with a stock shotblock, stock exhaust manifolds, stock cams, stock heads which have never been off the motor. The timing is pulled way back, car actually put over 500 to the rear wheels on just 11lbs of boost through an unlocked stalled auto. I don't advertise that cause I think its rice to say you have more hp from a tune thats not currently in the motor. You may not like the 4.6 but the potential is enormous. It WILL be a 9 second ac'd street car within the next year.
no what sums it up is when my A4 WS6 (the black one) was stock i beat about 6 or 7 5 speed mach 1's by anywhere from a fender to a whole car, i never lost to one and have never seen a bone stock LS1 loose to one in my street racing days and there are about 3-4 bolt on ones that come out with us every time, my white ws6 which is a 6-Speed when it was bone stock beat a bone stock mach 1 5 speed by 2.5 cars from a roll and about 2 cars from a dig ...i dont see how thats a drivers race...bottom line is
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
1) Question: how many new jobs were created last month?
Answer: Who the hell knows, no way to quantify that.
2) Question: how many stock Machs have gotton beat by stock LS1's since 2003?
Answer: Who the hell knows? no way to quantify that
Why don't you take your little narrow minded *** and your little (LS1>Mach) chart and go to the Mach 1 registry and check the quarter mile section for stock Machs and see that a great deal of them went low 13's bone stock. Since LS1's stock are low 13 second cars it is a DRIVERS RACE. And the idiotic argument that LS1's trap higher means nothing to any real racer. Who cares what your car traps if you loose? Yes M6 LS1's are faster than auto Machs+ common knowledge. Thats why mine is not stock anymore.
08-17-2009, 06:03 PM
#95
10 Second Club
no what sums it up is when my A4 WS6 (the black one) was stock i beat about 6 or 7 5 speed mach 1's by anywhere from a fender to a whole car, i never lost to one and have never seen a bone stock LS1 loose to one in my street racing days and there are about 3-4 bolt on ones that come out with us every time, my white ws6 which is a 6-Speed when it was bone stock beat a bone stock mach 1 5 speed by 2.5 cars from a roll and about 2 cars from a dig ...i dont see how thats a drivers race...bottom line is
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
thank you for the best post in this thread.
08-17-2009, 06:28 PM
#96
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously dude get a life. Get off of Mike's nutz. Can't knock someone for their success. I don't see anywhere in this thread where he was being arrogant. I just see him posting videos/dynographs about his car in which I think everyone should be required to do so before talking ****. Mike's a really cool guy and your just downright pitiful for even posting something like that above.
A 'really cool guy' sends out PM's to meet up to 'handle it'. Yeah, mmm'ok. If that's your idea of a really cool guy, then so be it. Dude's got an attitude problem. It's that simple.
again
no what sums it up is when my A4 WS6 (the black one) was stock i beat about 6 or 7 5 speed mach 1's by anywhere from a fender to a whole car, i never lost to one and have never seen a bone stock LS1 loose to one in my street racing days and there are about 3-4 bolt on ones that come out with us every time, my white ws6 which is a 6-Speed when it was bone stock beat a bone stock mach 1 5 speed by 2.5 cars from a roll and about 2 cars from a dig ...i dont see how thats a drivers race...bottom line is
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
Stock vs stock both with good drivers
Dig, Roll, Reverse, Sideways it dosent matter
M6 LS1 > 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 = 5 Speed Mach
A4 LS1 > Auto Mach
LS1's will have more kills on machs then the other way around...why? because its the faster car
And for every vid. you post, another can be posted to say otherwise. THe point? the cars are closer than you obviously believe.
stock for stock and light bolt on for light bolt on, ET's will be there, but the TS advantage is for the LS (for obvious reasons).
SIMPLE: machs are low-mid 13s, and so are LS fbods. Have you ever driven a mach? They aren't setup like any other mustang before (or after) it. IE: it takes seat time to drive one properly.
08-17-2009, 08:22 PM
#98
10 Second Club
MMMM'ok. Sounds liek you're the one ridin' the
A 'really cool guy' sends out PM's to meet up to 'handle it'. Yeah, mmm'ok. If that's your idea of a really cool guy, then so be it. Dude's got an attitude problem. It's that simple.
again
MMM'ok. Too bad I have first hand experience that says otherwise....FROM A ROLL.
And for every vid. you post, another can be posted to say otherwise. THe point? the cars are closer than you obviously believe.
stock for stock and light bolt on for light bolt on, ET's will be there, but the TS advantage is for the LS (for obvious reasons).
SIMPLE: machs are low-mid 13s, and so are LS fbods. Have you ever driven a mach? They aren't setup like any other mustang before (or after) it. IE: it takes seat time to drive one properly.
A 'really cool guy' sends out PM's to meet up to 'handle it'. Yeah, mmm'ok. If that's your idea of a really cool guy, then so be it. Dude's got an attitude problem. It's that simple.
again
MMM'ok. Too bad I have first hand experience that says otherwise....FROM A ROLL.
And for every vid. you post, another can be posted to say otherwise. THe point? the cars are closer than you obviously believe.
stock for stock and light bolt on for light bolt on, ET's will be there, but the TS advantage is for the LS (for obvious reasons).
SIMPLE: machs are low-mid 13s, and so are LS fbods. Have you ever driven a mach? They aren't setup like any other mustang before (or after) it. IE: it takes seat time to drive one properly.
mach's are very respectable for an n\a mustang. but all things equal the ls1 is always 1-2 tenths quicker and 2-3 mph faster.
08-17-2009, 10:16 PM
#99
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MMMM'ok. Sounds liek you're the one ridin' the
A 'really cool guy' sends out PM's to meet up to 'handle it'. Yeah, mmm'ok. If that's your idea of a really cool guy, then so be it. Dude's got an attitude problem. It's that simple.
again
MMM'ok. Too bad I have first hand experience that says otherwise....FROM A ROLL.
And for every vid. you post, another can be posted to say otherwise. THe point? the cars are closer than you obviously believe.
stock for stock and light bolt on for light bolt on, ET's will be there, but the TS advantage is for the LS (for obvious reasons).
SIMPLE: machs are low-mid 13s, and so are LS fbods. Have you ever driven a mach? They aren't setup like any other mustang before (or after) it. IE: it takes seat time to drive one properly.
A 'really cool guy' sends out PM's to meet up to 'handle it'. Yeah, mmm'ok. If that's your idea of a really cool guy, then so be it. Dude's got an attitude problem. It's that simple.
again
MMM'ok. Too bad I have first hand experience that says otherwise....FROM A ROLL.
And for every vid. you post, another can be posted to say otherwise. THe point? the cars are closer than you obviously believe.
stock for stock and light bolt on for light bolt on, ET's will be there, but the TS advantage is for the LS (for obvious reasons).
SIMPLE: machs are low-mid 13s, and so are LS fbods. Have you ever driven a mach? They aren't setup like any other mustang before (or after) it. IE: it takes seat time to drive one properly.
08-17-2009, 10:39 PM
#100
