Ke^in

I don't know how I missed this Manalishi. I'd rather be kissed by you.

big hammer

2v's run 14.0

Ke^in

Around the rings of Uranus.

big hammer

that's a shitty place to be right now

Ke^in

*Nod* sounds like a fecal nightmare.

lemons12

iTrader: (71)

We are talking stock cars, not modded.

Yes, very hard to believe.. Since I have never seen a stock 2V or even simple bolt ons (intake short throw) run a 13.9 or faster. Not on the internet, talking real life.

Nacho SS

iTrader: (4)

I think the point is its kinda difficult to make a 2v run a good time and produce good times so the guys with LSx platforms fail to see the novelty or importance of modding them.

Ke^in

Yeah... so was I. Modded ones easily go 13.5s
I'd point you to Youtube to show you, but then you'd just call it "internet racing" Anyone however posting a similar video in this forum is legit. Those ones of youtube, those are internet videos.
Hard? No. Easy and as cost effective as a LS1? Certainly not.
What if you want something other than a Fbody.. or even a GM?

lemons12

iTrader: (71)

I don't 100% believe anything I see on here.. Not only do I not know what is done to the car but most people don't include the DA which is a HUGE factor when looking at track times. Hell, I know people that have freak runs and run a 7.5@93mph when EVERY single other 50-60 passes including the ones that night the fastest has been consistent 7.7s@90mph.. Would I call that a 7.5 car? Hell no, it runs 7.5s, just because it amazingly ran that time one time, regardless of reasons, its not that quick.
I'm not being hypocrytical, I call it as I see it... GM/Ford/Import based, doesn't matter to me.

But yes, to answer your statement... I would call it "internet racing", regardless of what it is.

big hammer

you really should change your name to 2VOMG

Ke^in

Then we really agree.

The fastest known time for a stock (read fully stock) 2v GT was a 13.6/7. And that's from what *I* know. There could be faster. I would NEVER call that the average times decent drivers can get with 2v. That would be trollish.


Most people that don't know how to drive (The majority of people) are getting 14s in stock 2v.

Most people that DO know how to drive are getting high 13s regularly.

It's the same way with Camaro's. Most Camaro runs I've seen are in the 14s. why? Because most people can't drive. However, those than can .. well we know the results.

Again, I am in no way exaggerating about the performance on my car, or any other 2v GT out there. 13.9 is slow. Hell a decent driver in a stock SRT-4 can run that.

But lets say after all this, you still wont agree. Can you explain to me how it's simply not possible for a car that is rated a 14.0 (By averages) can't hit 13.9s regularly by those that know how to drive? Again, we are talking .1 of a second here. People have done that not even trying.

Really though, if it gets any more silly I'll just invite the many people I know who did 13.9s regularly in a stock GT. I am sure they'll love to be told it's not possible.

*mwaaah* You know I lub you lemonparty.

I guess I just want something more than "Na na na it doesn't run that because I said so"

I really don't think that is too much to ask is it?

Ke^in

When you change yours to "exxagerateconstantly"


13.9 does not = OMG

Me saying 2v = slow does not = OMG.


Now lets go out back and make out. I'm all hot and bothered.

big hammer

2VOMG! BOOM! yay...

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

Can someone tell me how many times big hammer has said "boom" in the last week?

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

Actually I wouldn't mind having a 2004 GT 5 speed. If I did get one I would keep it 100% looking stock. I wouldn't even lower it or change the style of the wheels. And I would turn it into a hell of a sleeper. I think that would be fun.

ponygt65

He's been drinking a lot this week.
I've thought of that too, but I'd rather a 96-98GT with a warmed over Mach motor in it, 3.90s, alum DS, and a 3650 in it. To me, that'd be one helluva fun sleeper.

Lowered with chrome saleens, or Cobras.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

He must be having guy problems. Too many players out there, huh big hammer?

DiscerningZ32

All you would have to do is drop the POS 2V for a SBF.
Hell, put your 331 into a new edge and build the 351w for your current heap.

ponygt65

I almost said 'personal' issues. LOL


Actually, the other 'sleeper' I like is yours. If I got a pushrod, it'd be modeled after yours.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

I'm eventually going to get a 1968 Mustang Fastback. The 331 is going in it and it will be my show car. I love the *** end of a 67-68 fastback and they are much less seen than a 69-70.