1999 a4 z28 vs 2003 m5 Mach 1
01-19-2010, 04:14 AM
#41
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a hard time believing a stock 2v mustang would run with a stock LS1 goat.
Had it been a roll race to like, 130-150 he'd have more than likely taken me. But it was from a dig to 110.
I don't consider myself an AWESOME driver. Really. I've only ran this particular car at the track 5 times last summer. I know of tons of people in other Mustang forums that has gotten 13.7/13.8s.
01-19-2010, 06:41 AM
#42
13.5, 13.6, where are these guys racing mount everest?
01-19-2010, 06:52 AM
#43
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok 13.4/13.5? Most run 13.5 around here. I know people have gone faster than that in them. I will be the first to admit that most of you probably know Camaro times better than I do. So if the 13.4/5 times is off too, feel free to say something.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
01-19-2010, 06:56 AM
#44
Ok 13.4/13.5? Most run 13.5 around here. I know people have gone faster than that in them. I will be the first to admit that most of you probably know Camaro times better than I do. So if the 13.4/5 times is off too, feel free to say something.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
I think we should only be able to compare vehicles in the same area with the same elevation, climate etc.. or an area similar to another. Where i live i am below sea level lol. stock ls1s average 13.2, 13.3. 2v gt's 14.2, 14.1. Some occasional 13.96's runnin the sh....it out of them. Last edited by 99peweterls1; 01-19-2010 at 07:09 AM.
01-19-2010, 07:33 AM
#45
TECH Apprentice
01-19-2010, 08:37 AM
#46
10 Second Club
Ok 13.4/13.5? Most run 13.5 around here. I know people have gone faster than that in them. I will be the first to admit that most of you probably know Camaro times better than I do. So if the 13.4/5 times is off too, feel free to say something.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this forum on the matter. I know few have gotten high 12s, but not consistently.
The 5spd GT is MAGAZINE rated at 14.0/14.1 for the average driver. I don't see how running .1 faster for someone a bit better than average is all that impressive.
i was just bugging 2VOMG
01-19-2010, 08:56 AM
#47
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elevation here is 1,000ft. But the humidity is a bitch. DA is almost always 2,000ft. in the summer. The lowest I have ever seen it was 300ft. da on a cool fall evening. But besides that the humidity here is a bi@tch.
01-19-2010, 09:26 AM
#48
Ive driven a STOCK bullitt to a 13.89, so they're def 13 second cars. My f-body was in the 12's all day stock breaking no sweat on the other hand too. I see a few almost or stock fbodies in my area run 12's guys some guys really need to get the driver mod... Oh and yeah mach's are pretty equal to a ls car with a 6 speed usually having the edge over the mach at high speeds.
01-19-2010, 09:47 AM
#50
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't run the **** out of my GT when I hit my 13.97. I would say those running 13.7s in them are running the **** out of em.
2V automatics they do. Most people run high 13s low 14s in stock LS1s too. Whats your point? When I refer to stock times, I usually refer to those that can drive them. Anyone getting 14.3 or above in a stock 5spd GT needs more track seat time. Those aren't decent numbers.
So every mustang/ls1 comparison made in this forum is bunk? 
*nod*
Tell that to "big hammer" over there. He seems to be the one in denial 
Agreed.
2V automatics they do. Most people run high 13s low 14s in stock LS1s too. Whats your point? When I refer to stock times, I usually refer to those that can drive them. Anyone getting 14.3 or above in a stock 5spd GT needs more track seat time. Those aren't decent numbers.
compare apples to apples you silly sausage.
i was just being a troll again
My f-body was in the 12's all day stock breaking no sweat on the other hand too. I see a few almost or stock fbodies in my area run 12's guys some guys really need to get the driver mod... Oh and yeah mach's are pretty equal to a ls car with a 6 speed usually having the edge over the mach at high speeds.
01-19-2010, 10:27 AM
#53
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know, I didn't think anyone would care either.
But ever since I mentioned my 1/4 time with mine, certain people can't leave it be. In most any thread they are in that I am, they usually attempt to make some silly joke about it when it's not even on topic. I should ignore it I know. But it just gets silly.
For example this thread, I was referring to Mach1s and big ham derailed it with trollish comments about 2v GTs. So bitch to him.
It's like someone saying that stock LS1s only rarely hit 13.4s. Anyone continually making said comment in here would seriously get made fun of. And rightfully so.
Actually I was attempting to match big hammer's trollish comments.
Facts are, MOST people running stock cars (read not modded) on the 1/4 strip are usually newbs and younger kids that can't really drive. Most will be getting slow times because of this. Like I said, I have seen countless times on the track, and say, on passtime where people have taken a low 13 second car and got 15sec out of it. When people say "I see 2v GT owners doing 15s" I believe it. When I am referring to what a car can actually do, I usually talk about what someone that knows what they are doing can do. big hammer however was mentioning times that inexperienced drivers get on 2v GTs as if they were the average times decent drivers get with them. Again, I was just matching his trolling. Read the second post in this thread as far as what I really said about LS1 fbodies.
Anytime you see me replying to big hammer, it's safe to take what I say with a grain of salt.
But ever since I mentioned my 1/4 time with mine, certain people can't leave it be. In most any thread they are in that I am, they usually attempt to make some silly joke about it when it's not even on topic. I should ignore it I know. But it just gets silly.
For example this thread, I was referring to Mach1s and big ham derailed it with trollish comments about 2v GTs. So bitch to him.It's like someone saying that stock LS1s only rarely hit 13.4s. Anyone continually making said comment in here would seriously get made fun of. And rightfully so.
Facts are, MOST people running stock cars (read not modded) on the 1/4 strip are usually newbs and younger kids that can't really drive. Most will be getting slow times because of this. Like I said, I have seen countless times on the track, and say, on passtime where people have taken a low 13 second car and got 15sec out of it. When people say "I see 2v GT owners doing 15s" I believe it. When I am referring to what a car can actually do, I usually talk about what someone that knows what they are doing can do. big hammer however was mentioning times that inexperienced drivers get on 2v GTs as if they were the average times decent drivers get with them. Again, I was just matching his trolling. Read the second post in this thread as far as what I really said about LS1 fbodies.
Ok 13.4/13.5? Most run 13.5 around here. I know people have gone faster than that in them. I will be the first to admit that most of you probably know Camaro times better than I do. So if the 13.4/5 times is off too, feel free to say something.
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this
I know people brag about running 13.3s stock, as if it's impressive, and not easily gotten. Atleast from reading this
Anytime you see me replying to big hammer, it's safe to take what I say with a grain of salt.
Last edited by Ke^in; 01-19-2010 at 10:41 AM.
01-19-2010, 10:49 AM
#55
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-19-2010, 10:55 AM
#56
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish I could have found one that was cheaper and had less miles on it then the ones I actually found for sale.
Oh well.
01-19-2010, 11:44 AM
#57
10 Second Club
You know, I didn't think anyone would care either.
But ever since I mentioned my 1/4 time with mine, certain people can't leave it be. In most any thread they are in that I am, they usually attempt to make some silly joke about it when it's not even on topic. I should ignore it I know. But it just gets silly. For example this thread, I was referring to Mach1s and big ham derailed it with trollish comments about 2v GTs. So bitch to him.
It's like someone saying that stock LS1s only rarely hit 13.4s. Anyone continually making said comment in here would seriously get made fun of. And rightfully so.
Actually I was attempting to match big hammer's trollish comments.
Facts are, MOST people running stock cars (read not modded) on the 1/4 strip are usually newbs and younger kids that can't really drive. Most will be getting slow times because of this. Like I said, I have seen countless times on the track, and say, on passtime where people have taken a low 13 second car and got 15sec out of it. When people say "I see 2v GT owners doing 15s" I believe it. When I am referring to what a car can actually do, I usually talk about what someone that knows what they are doing can do. big hammer however was mentioning times that inexperienced drivers get on 2v GTs as if they were the average times decent drivers get with them. Again, I was just matching his trolling. Read the second post in this thread as far as what I really said about LS1 fbodies.
[/b]
Anytime you see me replying to big hammer, it's safe to take what I say with a grain of salt.
But ever since I mentioned my 1/4 time with mine, certain people can't leave it be. In most any thread they are in that I am, they usually attempt to make some silly joke about it when it's not even on topic. I should ignore it I know. But it just gets silly.
For example this thread, I was referring to Mach1s and big ham derailed it with trollish comments about 2v GTs. So bitch to him.It's like someone saying that stock LS1s only rarely hit 13.4s. Anyone continually making said comment in here would seriously get made fun of. And rightfully so.
Actually I was attempting to match big hammer's trollish comments.
Facts are, MOST people running stock cars (read not modded) on the 1/4 strip are usually newbs and younger kids that can't really drive. Most will be getting slow times because of this. Like I said, I have seen countless times on the track, and say, on passtime where people have taken a low 13 second car and got 15sec out of it. When people say "I see 2v GT owners doing 15s" I believe it. When I am referring to what a car can actually do, I usually talk about what someone that knows what they are doing can do. big hammer however was mentioning times that inexperienced drivers get on 2v GTs as if they were the average times decent drivers get with them. Again, I was just matching his trolling. Read the second post in this thread as far as what I really said about LS1 fbodies.
[/b]
Anytime you see me replying to big hammer, it's safe to take what I say with a grain of salt.
this is how much of a retard you are:
ls1's run 13.5-13.6
2v's run 13.9. no exceptions.
so therefore in your mind ls1's and 2v's are very close--- could even be considered a magical drivers race!
so now putting it like that you can see why you come off like a complete fanboi retard.
i will continue to let you make a fool of yourself.
01-19-2010, 12:25 PM
#59
this is how much of a retard you are:
ls1's run 13.5-13.6
2v's run 13.9. no exceptions.
so therefore in your mind ls1's and 2v's are very close--- could even be considered a magical drivers race!
so now putting it like that you can see why you come off like a complete fanboi retard.
i will continue to let you make a fool of yourself.
ls1's run 13.5-13.6
2v's run 13.9. no exceptions.
so therefore in your mind ls1's and 2v's are very close--- could even be considered a magical drivers race!
so now putting it like that you can see why you come off like a complete fanboi retard.
i will continue to let you make a fool of yourself.
01-19-2010, 12:49 PM
#60
Kevin defending his stock GT again? lulz Nothing to see here 
Mach's and LS1 F-Bods are a drivers race stock for stock and bolt ons. Throw in cams and the LS1 will definitely have a major advantage. But then again, a mach has a solid 8.8 that has no issues with 4.10's and slicks
Mach's and LS1 F-Bods are a drivers race stock for stock and bolt ons. Throw in cams and the LS1 will definitely have a major advantage. But then again, a mach has a solid 8.8 that has no issues with 4.10's and slicks