Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Another race to tell you about...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 12:46 AM
  #181  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
Made the correction, read it again. Watching tv and iPhone typing isn't the easiest to pay attention too lol
Is the 340/345 in your sig your rwhp and rwtq?
Old 01-28-2010, 12:52 AM
  #182  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
13lu91rS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
On a serious note. If YOU claim a stock LT1 runs 14.0-13.8 then why do you say it will be faster than a 2v that has run 14.0-13.8?
That gets claimed because...

1. What are the chances of getting both BONE stock cars lined up?
2. Be honest with yourself, 9/10 the lt/ls will pull out on the mustang everytime. Maybe not by much, but they will end up in front.
3. Yes I'm glad there is a mature mustang owner here that knows how to drive their car well. But most are full of **** and can't.
4. I have been around the mustang crowd, and it's usually the younger car crowd, which is good. But they have a cocky attitude and don't know the difference between an intake mani and a CAI
Old 01-28-2010, 12:53 AM
  #183  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Is the 340/345 in your sig your rwhp and rwtq?
Do you got enough to cover that? LMAO!
Old 01-28-2010, 12:54 AM
  #184  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
13lu91rS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Is the 340/345 in your sig your rwhp and rwtq?
Yea that's it. Nothing to make a huge deal over. Another typical ls1 number lol
Old 01-28-2010, 12:54 AM
  #185  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
find me a stock n/a mustang with similiar mods go 12s and I'd be pretty impressed no offense.
Here I'll do better for you. Take ANY of these cars in the link below, add ONLY a $139 set of gears and they will run faster than your car.

http://mach1registry.org/forums/showthread.php?t=99903
Old 01-28-2010, 12:55 AM
  #186  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
Yea that's it. Nothing to make a huge deal over. Another typical ls1 number lol
340rwhp running 12.9 is laughable. And you say a Mustang has to have MORE power than a LS1 to run the same times? Sure
Old 01-28-2010, 12:56 AM
  #187  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
Do you got enough to cover that? LMAO!
No, loan me some of yours. LOL
Old 01-28-2010, 12:58 AM
  #188  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
340rwhp running 12.9 is laughable. And you say a Mustang has to have MORE power than a LS1 to run the same times? Sure
Happy dyno? Just as a side note the LT1 does make a lot more torque than the 2V. So it is going to come out of the hole better and the Stang MAY not have enough to run it down but run a similar time. You've seen this as have I.
Old 01-28-2010, 12:59 AM
  #189  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
13lu91rS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lol is it saying I have 0 suspension mods, on a shitty 1.9 60' and only going 12.8 on a 275 nitto?
Old 01-28-2010, 01:02 AM
  #190  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
So it is going to come out of the hole better and the Stang MAY not have enough to run it down but run a similar time.
That makes no sense. If they run the same time then they are exactly the same in the 1/4th given both leave the line at the same time. Now reaction time has nothing at all to do with the question here. If both the 2v and the LT1 run 14.0-13.8 how is one faster than the other? I'm not saying one is faster than the other or not and I really don't care. I just want a logical answer from 50 shot guy on the question I asked him.
Old 01-28-2010, 01:02 AM
  #191  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
Lol is it saying I have 0 suspension mods, on a shitty 1.9 60' and only going 12.8 on a 275 nitto?
Are you making excuses?
Old 01-28-2010, 01:06 AM
  #192  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
13lu91rS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe, but not to happy as most fbodys with my mods put down about the same numbers and run around the same trap
Old 01-28-2010, 01:06 AM
  #193  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I make 375Rwhp and run low-mid 11s on motor...
Old 01-28-2010, 01:08 AM
  #194  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
Maybe, but not to happy as most fbodys with my mods put down about the same numbers and run around the same trap
How bout this? This guy has a stock 302, TW heads, TW Stage 1 cam (shitty), and a 650 carb. I can assure you that car doesn't make anywhere close to 340rwhp and....well watch the video.

http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...t=coupe013.flv
Old 01-28-2010, 01:08 AM
  #195  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
That makes no sense. If they run the same time then they are exactly the same in the 1/4th given both leave the line at the same time. Now reaction time has nothing at all to do with the question here. If both the 2v and the LT1 run 14.0-13.8 how is one faster than the other? I'm not saying one is faster than the other or not and I really don't care. I just want a logical answer from 50 shot guy on the question I asked him.
I knew that wasn't going to come across the way I wanted it to. OK I'll try again. Two cars that are CAPABLE of running the same times. One has more torque than the other. On the street , this is the SRK, the car with the torque advantage is going to jump out on the other car, given equal drivers, and then the other car is going to have to catch the other one. Depending on how far they run the lower torque car may not catch the other. Is that more clear? On a track with identical reaction times you are correct it would make no difference. Sorry about my poorly worded post previously.
Old 01-28-2010, 01:08 AM
  #196  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
I make 375Rwhp and run low-mid 11s on motor...
Yea and you also have an automatic do all the shifting for you. Tell me, do you have someone feed you too?
Old 01-28-2010, 01:09 AM
  #197  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
13lu91rS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: oviedo, FL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Are you making excuses?
Not making excuses at all. My mph is alot higher than what it should be for my e.t.
Old 01-28-2010, 01:12 AM
  #198  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
I knew that wasn't going to come across the way I wanted it to. OK I'll try again. Two cars that are CAPABLE of running the same times. One has more torque than the other. On the street , this is the SRK, the car with the torque advantage is going to jump out on the other car, given equal drivers, and then the other car is going to have to catch the other one. Depending on how far they run the lower torque car may not catch the other. Is that more clear? On a track with identical reaction times you are correct it would make no difference. Sorry about my poorly worded post previously.
Since the street doesn't have an ET from one point to the other you can't use it as a testing ground. Now if you could find a test of both going 1/2 or a mile then that would put the issue to rest. But I doubt there is one out there. Infact if you wanted you could compare the 1/8 times of both cars. If one runs slower than the other yet they both run the same time in the 1/4 then you can see that he was running down the other car and then you could GUESS what would happen after the 1/4.
Old 01-28-2010, 01:13 AM
  #199  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 13lu91rS
Not making excuses at all. My mph is alot higher than what it should be for my e.t.
109mph

That is right in the range of a bolt on Mach 1!!!!
Old 01-28-2010, 01:14 AM
  #200  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
FlashLCD33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stopsign, you're bein a little pissy tonight aren't ya?

BTW that fox is pretty mean for a bunch of junk **** piled together. ET/mph?

Even with no power (aka ford powered) those little cars move out.


Quick Reply: Another race to tell you about...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.